I think posting that info is useful. Presumably you got it from where I did as my info was identical. What I have seen on this forum and worse still on meso suggests people usually have an incorrect idea of what normal levels are. From what people say they are taking and especially from what bodybuilders can take it is very easy to get a false impression that doses of 4iu a day and up are not high doses. Doses of 2iu or less are at least closer to physiological for young people, but the reality is no one knows what the long term consequences are of taking hgh especially in older people who are taking it for visceral fat reduction or muscle mass maintenance, which seems to be the most common reason here. The long term studies just are not there, a few short term ones and animal studies. Relatively low levels of gh are very common with increasing age and more so with obesity, but it is important to remember that no medical recommendations exist for using it in those cases, the risks are thought to be greater than the benefits. I would be surprised if wellness clinics and celebrity doctors did not use it but that does not make it safe.
The secretagogues are possibly a bit safer in that they do not increase levels as much as hgh, but there is no evidence of long term safety. Short term improvements of things like visceral fat or lipids or body composition have been shown in studies of tesamorelin in HIV patients, but given the large number of animal studies showing better life expectancy with gh deficiency you really need the long term safety data to have any real idea of long term safety, and it is not likely to happen , as generally Doctors consider it a bad bet on safety, making long term studies hard to justify.
I am a bit hypocritical here given I am taking 1.5iu/day, (have not yet had igf-1 checked, but plan to ). I assume that 15mg tirz plus 5mg of reta should be enough to stop blood glucose going up, but that will get checked as well. My logic is that given the high overall health risks I have and that if I regain some or all of the 54% weight I have lost my odds of a further 10 years of reasonable health approach zero. (this is not that common a risk profile). So that possible small additional risks from hgh are probably lower than the benefit I get from helping to keep weight/fat off. Probably unprovable logic, but it makes sense to me. This logic is not going to apply to the vast majority of people on this forum who are at more normal levels of risk, where the risks of hgh or secretagogues, or ghrelin agonists are very likely to be higher than the benefits or are unknown.