It would be significant if it were true. The actual study showed this occurred in less than 9% of participants overall with higher percentages occurring in higher dosage groups. The data is in Table 3
https://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/NEJMoa2301972
Can’t speak for all of them but AFAIK, have always been consistent and test well. They’re also more expensive but they mostly have good customer service and are trustworthy. It’s the only place I would recommend for newbies.
You make a good point. Even at 250/case, that case will last most people for several years. Some of us were spending more than that monthly when we started with compounded glp1s.
Actually there were inconsistent fills AND they were also degrading from the baseline fills. Some suspect the buffer may have contributed to degradation.
Agree. They had a weird biz model about that…they would actually raise the price after it had been in stock for a while. But that was back when they used to do pre-orders and you’d get a discount for ordering early. Their reasoning was increased storage fees for storing it. It’s silly for them...
Just start by reading the threads. There is a separate vendor area in here. You can use the search tool to see other's experiences with different vendors.
Better to have 3rd party testing results. Many join or start crowd-sourced testing groups to reduce testing costs or join existing testing servers. @eydiz many people do go it alone and pay for their own testing; yes, more expensive but you’re still saving compared to compounded or Rx.
I think the weight regain is mainly because people can’t usually maintain without the assistance of glp1s. Otherwise we would have done so the first hundred diets we were on. ;)
glp1forum.com uses cookies and other similar functionality to help us personalize content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you are a registered member.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.