40,000 Patient Records Reflect >50% Maintained or Increased Weight Loss After 24 Months Off GLP’s

50ShadesGreyMarket

GLP-1 Enthusiast
Member Since
Aug 17, 2025
Posts
127
Likes Received
220
From
Houston Texas USA
United-States
According to the records of 40,000 patients at Epic, more than 50% of them were able to keep off the weight or continue to lose weight in the 2 years after discontinuation of GLP-1’s. Roughly 20% gained the weight back. This is based on medical records, not self-reported. Regardless of how many studies or reports come out, I still hear people parrot the narrative of Big Pharma that “once you pop, you can’t stop”. I get this may be the case for opioids, but GLP-1’s seem to affect different people differently.

1763083787837.png

 
How many of those went underground and are still on glp…or just not sharing with their doc that they are on compound now…

The problem with cognitive bias is that no matter how much data exists there will always be people who insist the reported outcome must be fabricated. It’s not possible to do a scientific research study that convinces everyone. We still have folks who insist the Earth is flat. 🤷🏼‍♀️
 
Must have been some good motivation and life changes after losing a ton of weight. After that accomplishment your gonna fight tooth n nail not to fuck it up..... encouraging news!
My theory is that there was something healed in the gut. I was put on Semaglutide by a doctor when my BMI was 20 due to low levels of Akkermansia. I had an actual test though, it wasn’t a theory. I regularly hear people say “my hormones are all outta wack” yet the person hasn’t visited an endocrinologist, they just started dosing stuff or went on birth control or supplements to “balance their wacky hormones” with no baseline. Are they consulting tarot cards or astrology?
 
My theory is that there was something healed in the gut. I was put on Semaglutide by a doctor when my BMI was 20 due to low levels of Akkermansia. I had an actual test though, it wasn’t a theory. I regularly hear people say “my hormones are all outta wack” yet the person hasn’t visited an endocrinologist, they just started dosing stuff or went on birth control or supplements to “balance their wacky hormones” with no baseline. Are they consulting tarot cards or astrology?
This confuses me. Akkermansia produce GLP1, not the reverse, so why didnt your doc prescribe akkermansia probiotic, or you know, the implant procedure? With a bmi of 20, glp-1
wouldnt have been indicated?
 
I was on .25mg, idea at the time was to take it for 20 weeks and re-test; I started in August. Implant wasn’t suggested but I would be against that especially since I already get an MRI with contrast every 4-6 months. Before surgery they wanted to implant a vagus nerve stimulator in my chest and I declined. Ended up staying on Topamax instead until a few months after the procedure. I’m trying to move in a direction where I am less dependent on prescription medications.

I have another appointment beginning of December and I’ll ask about probiotics as an option.
 
How many of your epic records show you are still on it? My record almost 3 years ago shows I took MJ for 2 months and now it doesn’t…never stopped..would it count me as a maintainer?
I’m not with Epic but I understand the question is related to patient records. Have you had a conversation with your doctor? Out of the nearly 190,000 patients that discontinued GLP-1’s, they only chose to follow up with 40,000 of them, likely to control for situations like yours.
 
I’m not with Epic but I understand the question is related to patient records. Have you had a conversation with your doctor? Out of the nearly 190,000 patients that discontinued GLP-1’s, they only chose to follow up with 40,000 of them, likely to control for situations like yours.
This article doesn’t say it controlled for anything. The fact that the authors do not mention the possibility of patients switching to compounding as a limiting factor in this study makes it weak.

If my chart was picked for this study it would show that I discontinued it (no more prescriptions written and no self report from the patient) and lost more after I stopped picking of prescriptions. How could the chart detect I went to compound?

To those that carry the genetic propensity for obesity we know that nothing is being cured. When we come off glps we find the insatiable appetite and our exquisitely trained taste buds come right back on line…not much warm up necessary.
 
To those that carry the genetic propensity for obesity we know that nothing is being cured. When we come off glps we find the insatiable appetite and our exquisitely trained taste buds come right back on line…not much warm up necessary.
Mine starts to come back by the end of the week. I can't imagine maintaining for 2 years after stopping GLPs, without feeling hungry all the time like I have on so many diets. I'm not going back to that!
 
This confuses me. Akkermansia produce GLP1, not the reverse, so why didnt your doc prescribe akkermansia probiotic, or you know, the implant procedure? With a bmi of 20, glp-1
wouldnt have been indicated?
Probiotics alone won’t change your gut permanently. One is better off changing their diet to feed the bacteria they desire.
 
Just my opinion here
I suspect there are some serious methodological flaws in this study, I am not qualified to judge this, but if any readers with research experience are, feel free to comment.
It is worth noting that this is not published in a peer reviewed journal. "However, it’s important to note that they do an internal peer review, but no third party peer review"
There have been a lot of studies on weight regain after weight loss, as in hundreds to thousands of papers on the subject. The results of this study are not consistent with the previous research.
In general most studies over the past 40 to 50 years show that most people who lose weight regain all or most of that weight over the next few years. Irrespective of how they lost the weight. This has been my personal experience as well.
The SURMOUNT-4 Randomized Clinical Trial
After 36 weeks of open-label maximum tolerated dose of tirzepatide (10 or 15 mg), adults (n = 670) with obesity or overweight (without diabetes) experienced a mean weight reduction of 20.9%. From randomization (at week 36), those switched to placebo experienced a 14% weight regain and those continuing tirzepatide experienced an additional 5.5% weight reduction during the 52-week double-blind period.
This is a prospective, controlled, randomised clinical trial published in a reputable peer reviewed journal JAMA Journal of the American Medical Association
It showed 20.9% weight loss with tirzepatide, after ceasing it over a year, the ones on placebo gained 14%, leaving average weight loss of 6.9%, those who received tirzepatide lost a further 5.5%.
There are many other good quality peer reviewed papers that show similar results for tirzepatide, semaglutide and all other weight loss methods over decades excepting surgery.
Sorry but that study sounds great but is not likely to be accurate, there is very little description of their methods of getting and interpreting the data they used so it is not really possible to assess what went wrong. They are making extraordinary claims, that are different to the established body of research, do not acknowledge this in the article and fail to provide the extraordinary evidence to back up their claims.
One of the great things about access to inexpensive GLP-1 drugs is you can experiment with stopping and starting and increasing and decreasing doses as needed. Based on the research, I think most people are going to need to stay on the dose they used to lose the weight, to keep it off, but trying reduced doses or stopping it for maintenance is a easy harmless experiment so long as you don't let weight regain get away from you before restarting it if necessary.
 
Probiotics alone won’t change your gut permanently. One is better off changing their diet to feed the bacteria they desire.
That is totally true, and some probiotics are tricky to acquire. There is one you only get when you're born. Antibiotics kill them.
 
The problem with cognitive bias is that no matter how much data exists there will always be people who insist the reported outcome must be fabricated. It’s not possible to do a scientific research study that convinces everyone. We still have folks who insist the Earth is flat. 🤷🏼‍♀️

There's a pretty good argument that this data is highly biased and not representative of real weight regain after discontinuation.

To collect this data, they queried Cosmos (Epic’s aggregated dataset) for patients with a continuous GLP-1 order >90 days who lost >5 lb, and who had no GLP-1 order in the year after the estimated end of treatment. That's it. It doesn't account for people switching to compounding, or even switching to a different healthcare provider who doesn't use Epic's system. To count as "discontinued" patients could have very well switched doctors, stopped refilling but using old supply, or even have paid in cash for their medication (which means it won't show up in Epic's EHR). Additionally this only accounts for people who later came back and got their weight checked a year later, but that's another story.

Let me reiterate, If a patient switches to:
  • A hospital system running Cerner, Athena, NextGen, eClinicalWorks, etc. (Anything except Cosmos)
  • A clinic that does not participate in Cosmos
  • A telehealth platform that is not integrated with their old Epic chart
  • Most importantly, compounding (millions of people switched over during shortage)
Then this study now considers them "stopped"

You can see how the results might potentially be biased.
 
Last edited:
There's a pretty good argument that this data is highly biased and not representative of real weight regain after discontinuation.

To collect this data, they queried Cosmos (Epic’s aggregated dataset) for patients with a continuous GLP-1 order >90 days who lost >5 lb, and who had no GLP-1 order in the year after the estimated end of treatment. That's it. It doesn't account for people switching to compounding, or even switching to a different healthcare provider who doesn't use Epic's system. To count as "discontinued" patients could have very well switched doctors, stopped refilling but using old supply, or even have paid in cash for their medication (which means it won't show up in Epic's EHR). Additionally this only accounts for people who later came back and got their weight checked a year later, but that's another story.

Let me reiterate, If a patient switches to:
  • A hospital system running Cerner, Athena, NextGen, eClinicalWorks, etc. (Anything except Cosmos)
  • A clinic that does not participate in Cosmos
  • A telehealth platform that is not integrated with their old Epic chart
  • Most importantly, compounding (millions of people switched over during shortage)
Then this study now considers them "stopped"

You can see how the results might potentially be biased.
I know regardless of how research is done, regardless of outcomes, there will always be a subset of the population that insists their theory with no data is more valid than any study with data. Covid-19 was a perfect social experiment, we still have individuals who believe bleach can cure the virus within the human body. @Nathanologist made a post about this a couple of weeks ago.

If you actually read the report, out of the 189,000 patients, only 40,000 were included to avoid those who may have switched to another form of GLP-1, compounded, etc. For the many who’ve stopped GLP-1’s and not ballooned back to their original weight, hearing news that other individuals have had the same experience gives them relief that there’s nothing wrong with them.
 
With no other intention than all of the possible compassion in the world and meant for all ears and not just some: we all need something to believe in.

-and my background is solidly in statistical research and methodolgy and I too find that I need something to believe in that sometimes is at odds with the data presented to me.

I have no answer or resolution for this other than that some days I am really OK with the great placebo effect of faith because some days that is what I need to believe in because some days are just frickin hard.
 
I know regardless of how research is done, regardless of outcomes, there will always be a subset of the population that insists their theory with no data is more valid than any study with data. Covid-19 was a perfect social experiment, we still have individuals who believe bleach can cure the virus within the human body. @Nathanologist made a post about this a couple of weeks ago.

If you actually read the report, out of the 189,000 patients, only 40,000 were included to avoid those who may have switched to another form of GLP-1, compounded, etc. For the many who’ve stopped GLP-1’s and not ballooned back to their original weight, hearing news that other individuals have had the same experience gives them relief that there’s nothing wrong with them.

Where was it explained that they controlled for compounding by taking out 40k people?
 
Top Bottom