QSC Xmas Promo - ⚠️ Buyer Beware ⚠️

[nccane]

View attachment 4446
Is QSC really pushing this product as part of their Christmas promo? This is dangerous, wondering if this is some sort of mistake. This whole batch should be destroyed, curious to hear what Tracy has to say about this..

Do you really think he gives a shit if he was was the one who linked/provided the report to begin with? Theres also several non glp1 reports on that list below 98%.

Buy it, or don't. I have no sympathy for anyone at least not doing the bare minimum by clicking on the hyperlinked vendor coas before they place an order.

 

[glpfun]

 

[nurseratchit]

Not the first time they've done this, but last time it was discovered in a 3rd party test.

This was a 2nd party test linked to in their promo price list. Nice of them to let their customers know when they are buying a shit product. In a weird way, I actually view the fact that they were transparent about this as a positive.

Or did the test slip through the cracks?

 

[Chizikitide-1977]

Or did the test slip through the cracks?

Quite possible. But I've followed this vendor by far the longest of any of the Chinese and my gut is telling me this was deliberate.

Given the past backlash that came last time this was discovered, maybe they just realized it's better to be up front about this stuff. To be clear I'm absolutely not suggesting QSC is in anyway trustworthy or more honest than any other vendor. But given their huge customer base and large number of independent tests, i think they gradually realized there are some things they just won't be able to get away with and stopped trying.

 

[chmuse]

Quite possible. But I've followed this vendor by far the longest of any of the Chinese and my gut is telling me this was deliberate.

Given the past backlash that came last time this was discovered, maybe they just realized it's better to be up front about this stuff. To be clear I'm absolutely not suggesting QSC is in anyway trustworthy or more honest than any other vendor. But given their huge customer base and large number of independent tests, i think they gradually realized there are some things they just won't be able to get away with and stopped trying.

If it's.cheap enough, someone will buy it and just dose for 90% potency. As long as it isn't degrading fast or contaminated.

 

[geoguy78]

Looks like Tracy pulled that CJC No DAC from the promo, according to the updated price sheet from this morning. I can't help but wonder of it's the "secret sauce" in the current CJC No DAC/Ipamorelin offering though..... Which sucks, because its a good price and I'm contemplating grabbing some HGH secretagogues right now.

 

[stickfigure]

Compare the test dates. If they are far apart, it's unlikely Mod.GRF is from the same batch.

 

[geoguy78]

Compare the test dates. If they are far apart, it's unlikely Mod.GRF is from the same batch.

On a related note, I wish that it would be referred to as Mod GRF (the actual name) more often, and not "CJC-1295 without DAC" which isn't really correct.

 

[exploitedworkerbee]

I think the fact that @Qingdao Sigma has not replied to my tag asking if it’s just an old test of if they are still selling the contaminated stuff says all we need to know. Definitely don’t buy the cjc no dac 5mg unless you want a little sema mixed in there for good measure.

 

[CallieKat]

Tracy one said…don’t remember where…that he tests everything because it’s good for business. He’s right…

 

[nccane]

I think the fact that @Qingdao Sigma has not replied to my tag asking if it’s just an old test of if they are still selling the contaminated stuff says all we need to know. Definitely don’t buy the cjc no dac 5mg unless you want a little sema mixed in there for good measure.

Why wouldn't anyone even buy it with that coa linked to begin with? Stupidity? Being a newbie? (I hope to god newbies are utilizing qsc)