Is QSC really pushing this product as part of their Christmas promo? This is dangerous, wondering if this is some sort of mistake. This whole batch should be destroyed, curious to hear what Tracy has to say about this..
QSC Xmas Promo - ⚠️ Buyer Beware ⚠️
- Thread starter Bronco
- Start date
Is QSC really pushing this product as part of their Christmas promo? This is dangerous, wondering if this is some sort of mistake. This whole batch should be destroyed, curious to hear what Tracy has to say about this..
Chizikitide-1977
Research Enthusiast
Not the first time they've done this, but last time it was discovered in a 3rd party test.
This was a 2nd party test linked to in their promo price list. Nice of them to let their customers know when they are buying a shit product. In a weird way, I actually view the fact that they were transparent about this as a positive.
This was a 2nd party test linked to in their promo price list. Nice of them to let their customers know when they are buying a shit product. In a weird way, I actually view the fact that they were transparent about this as a positive.
Doxyisfoxy
New Member
Could it be a mistake? That test is almost exactly a year out of date
there were some batches with sema contamination a yearish ago, which landed qsc on a bunch of buyer beware lists. They had appeared to get the situation under control based on 3rd party testing so the buyer bewares were eventually lifted. @Qingdao Sigma is sema-contaminated product still in circulation?
Can you post here or dm me with these better options? Much appreciated
clevesand
Research Enthusiast
lilly.com
ASC or TGI
Chizikitide-1977
Research Enthusiast
The test they linked to is over a year old, so looks like they might be dumping the last dregs from that with this promo.
keangkong
Well-Mannered Troll
- Joined
- Sep 2, 2024
- Messages
- 1,278
- Reaction score
- 3,413
That's weird, I am not sure what I was looking at, apparently read the wrong line or something.
Doxyisfoxy
New Member
Tuk is ASC, QSC is different. You were looking at the right line, wrong vender.
nonyabizznez
Advanced Researcher
Some lady near Memphis had it... She may be out on bond having a 🔥 sale!
GimmeABreak
Rabbit-hole Explorer
You can also try one of the local Memphis med spas.
Lullabytreehugger
Research Enthusiast
Good on you mate. This is why it is so important to test each and every single batch!
Do you really think he gives a shit if he was was the one who linked/provided the report to begin with? Theres also several non glp1 reports on that list below 98%.
Buy it, or don't. I have no sympathy for anyone at least not doing the bare minimum by clicking on the hyperlinked vendor coas before they place an order.
nurseratchit
Advanced Researcher
Or did the test slip through the cracks?
Chizikitide-1977
Research Enthusiast
Quite possible. But I've followed this vendor by far the longest of any of the Chinese and my gut is telling me this was deliberate.
Given the past backlash that came last time this was discovered, maybe they just realized it's better to be up front about this stuff. To be clear I'm absolutely not suggesting QSC is in anyway trustworthy or more honest than any other vendor. But given their huge customer base and large number of independent tests, i think they gradually realized there are some things they just won't be able to get away with and stopped trying.
chmuse
Public Nuisance 🦜🐧🦅🦚🦃🦢🐓🦆🦉
If it's.cheap enough, someone will buy it and just dose for 90% potency. As long as it isn't degrading fast or contaminated.
geoguy78
Advanced Researcher
Looks like Tracy pulled that CJC No DAC from the promo, according to the updated price sheet from this morning. I can't help but wonder of it's the "secret sauce" in the current CJC No DAC/Ipamorelin offering though..... Which sucks, because its a good price and I'm contemplating grabbing some HGH secretagogues right now.
stickfigure
Research Enthusiast
Compare the test dates. If they are far apart, it's unlikely Mod.GRF is from the same batch.
geoguy78
Advanced Researcher
On a related note, I wish that it would be referred to as Mod GRF (the actual name) more often, and not "CJC-1295 without DAC" which isn't really correct.
I think the fact that @Qingdao Sigma has not replied to my tag asking if it’s just an old test of if they are still selling the contaminated stuff says all we need to know. Definitely don’t buy the cjc no dac 5mg unless you want a little sema mixed in there for good measure.
Why wouldn't anyone even buy it with that coa linked to begin with? Stupidity? Being a newbie? (I hope to god newbies are utilizing qsc)
