Reconstituted Amopure 30mg Tirz…no stinging, no ISR, effective results

[Desertteepee2]

Yesterday Monday 10/14/24…RS reconstituted (using Hospira Bac water) a late July early August Amopure 30mg (L30) Tirzepatide purchase.
Some important findings:
No sting at all.
Absolutely effective in appetite suppression.
No injection site reaction.
Reconstituted with 100 units of bac water per 10 mg. of lypholized Tirzepatide. (so for 30 mg vial…used 300 units bac water)
What a relief after all the reports of stinging.

 

[Nikki nik]

Yesterday Monday 10/14/24…RS reconstituted (using Hospira Bac water) a late July early August Amopure 30mg (L30) Tirzepatide purchase.
Some important findings:
No sting at all.
Absolutely effective in appetite suppression.
No injection site reaction.
Reconstituted with 100 units of bac water per 10 mg. of lypholized Tirzepatide. (so for 30 mg vial…used 300 units bac water)
What a relief after all the reports of stinging.

They were next on my list after they finished selling all the stinging ones. Probably another month

 

[MiniatureSnail]

They were next on my list after they finished selling all the stinging ones. Probably another month

Just be aware that it might not be the situation of "finished selling all the stinging ones". This issue has been reported for a few months now, with gaps between reports. There's a screenshot somewhere of when someone asked them about it, and they said the problem was identified and resolved, but then it continued. Then other screenshots of people asking about it and they say it's normal. They've almost certainly made several batches during this time, especially with their sales (labor day). The problem seems to persist.

The person who runs Peptide Test has said that the lab techs reported that the consistency of Amo powder is different from any of the other peptides they've tested. That the pucks are lighter, the substance more powdery (I may not be using the actual adjectives he used). There is clearly something unique about their manufacturing process.

This is not to dissuade you. Just providing additional context.

 

[Nikki nik]

Just be aware that it might not be the situation of "finished selling all the stinging ones". This issue has been reported for a few months now, with gaps between reports. There's a screenshot somewhere of when someone asked them about it, and they said the problem was identified and resolved, but then it continued. Then other screenshots of people asking about it and they say it's normal. They've almost certainly made several batches during this time, especially with their sales (labor day). The problem seems to persist.

The person who runs Peptide Test has said that the lab techs reported that the consistency of Amo powder is different from any of the other peptides they've tested. That the pucks are lighter, the substance more powdery (I may not be using the actual adjectives he used). There is clearly something unique about their manufacturing process.

This is not to dissuade you. Just providing additional context.

Thank you for the information. Duly noted! Appreciate you

 

[YoYoFat]

What’s the stinging mean? Is it a sign of something dangerous? Or just a very unpleasant sensation?

 

[bguz1200]

Just be aware that it might not be the situation of "finished selling all the stinging ones". This issue has been reported for a few months now, with gaps between reports. There's a screenshot somewhere of when someone asked them about it, and they said the problem was identified and resolved, but then it continued. Then other screenshots of people asking about it and they say it's normal. They've almost certainly made several batches during this time, especially with their sales (labor day). The problem seems to persist.

The person who runs Peptide Test has said that the lab techs reported that the consistency of Amo powder is different from any of the other peptides they've tested. That the pucks are lighter, the substance more powdery (I may not be using the actual adjectives he used). There is clearly something unique about their manufacturing process.

This is not to dissuade you. Just providing additional context.

Where can I find this info from PeptideTest? Is it from a video, posted here, or other forum?

 

[MiniatureSnail]

Where can I find this info from PeptideTest? Is it from a video, posted here, or other forum?

He mentioned it in his discord server (for which invitations are currently closed, sorry.) it was during the group test arranged in this group and carried out by PT where 30ish vials were all tested in at once.

 

[MiniatureSnail]

What’s the stinging mean? Is it a sign of something dangerous? Or just a very unpleasant sensation?

That's not easy to determine because no one knows exactly what's causing it.

 

[bguz1200]

Just be aware that it might not be the situation of "finished selling all the stinging ones". This issue has been reported for a few months now, with gaps between reports. There's a screenshot somewhere of when someone asked them about it, and they said the problem was identified and resolved, but then it continued. Then other screenshots of people asking about it and they say it's normal. They've almost certainly made several batches during this time, especially with their sales (labor day). The problem seems to persist.

The person who runs Peptide Test has said that the lab techs reported that the consistency of Amo powder is different from any of the other peptides they've tested. That the pucks are lighter, the substance more powdery (I may not be using the actual adjectives he used). There is clearly something unique about their manufacturing process.

This is not to dissuade you. Just providing additional context.

Where can I find this info from PeptideTest? Is it from a video, posted here, or other forum?

He mentioned it in his discord server (for which invitations are currently closed, sorry.) it was during the group test arranged in this group and carried out by PT where 30ish vials were all tested in at once.

Thank you for this. I followed every thread here regarding the group test and thought I read every AmoPure post, I guess I missed this one statement from PeptideTest.

Do you have a screenshot? I'm interested in the exact words he used.

 

[MiniatureSnail]

Where can I find this info from PeptideTest? Is it from a video, posted here, or other forum?

Thank you for this. I followed every thread here regarding the group test and thought I read every AmoPure post, I guess I missed this one statement from PeptideTest.

Do you have a screenshot? I'm interested in the exact words he used.

No, sorry. Again, it was mentioned in his discord server, not on this forum. I would have to scroll up through months of chatter looking for it. If it comes up again, I'll take note.

Just to clarify - because now I feel bad, like I'm speaking for someone who isn't here to clarify themselves - he did not say anything bad, or otherwise negative about Amo. He simply stated in a very clinical, matter of fact way, that the consistency of the Amo vials were different and unique from the consistency that the lab usually sees from peptides. The consistency isn't necessarily related to the stinging and that was never implied. He just passed on the observation that his lab made.

 

[bguz1200]

No, sorry. Again, it was mentioned in his discord server, not on this forum. I would have to scroll up through months of chatter looking for it. If it comes up again, I'll take note.

Just to clarify - because now I feel bad, like I'm speaking for someone who isn't here to clarify themselves - he did not say anything bad, or otherwise negative about Amo. He simply stated in a very clinical, matter of fact way, that the consistency of the Amo vials were different and unique from the consistency that the lab usually sees from peptides. The consistency isn't necessarily related to the stinging and that was never implied. He just passed on the observation that his lab made.

Thanks for the follow-up. Yeah, I understand, that's why I was asking for the exact words that were used.

 

[rastan]

That's not easy to determine because no one knows exactly what's causing it.

Exactly - one user reported two test subjects sharing the same vial with one reporting stinging and one not.

 

[Mikeybharr]

I placed an order from Amopure for L30 and received a container saying T30. Is this correct?

 

[BeardedGuy]

I had the same result, no-stinging with good efficacy.

 

[nonyabizznez]

I placed an order from Amopure for L30 and received a container saying T30. Is this correct?

If you wanted Tirz yes... If you wanted Lipo-c or Letrazole no

 

[Desertteepee2]

I placed an order from Amopure for L30 and received a container saying T30. Is this correct?

Yes

 

[Mikeybharr]

Yes

Thank you kind stranger.

 

[Desertteepee2]

Just be aware that it might not be the situation of "finished selling all the stinging ones". This issue has been reported for a few months now, with gaps between reports. There's a screenshot somewhere of when someone asked them about it, and they said the problem was identified and resolved, but then it continued. Then other screenshots of people asking about it and they say it's normal. They've almost certainly made several batches during this time, especially with their sales (labor day). The problem seems to persist.

The person who runs Peptide Test has said that the lab techs reported that the consistency of Amo powder is different from any of the other peptides they've tested. That the pucks are lighter, the substance more powdery (I may not be using the actual adjectives he used). There is clearly something unique about their manufacturing process.

This is not to dissuade you. Just providing additional context.

Just be aware that it might not be the situation of "finished selling all the stinging ones". This issue has been reported for a few months now, with gaps between reports. There's a screenshot somewhere of when someone asked them about it, and they said the problem was identified and resolved, but then it continued. Then other screenshots of people asking about it and they say it's normal. They've almost certainly made several batches during this time, especially with their sales (labor day). The problem seems to persist.

The person who runs Peptide Test has said that the lab techs reported that the consistency of Amo powder is different from any of the other peptides they've tested. That the pucks are lighter, the substance more powdery (I may not be using the actual adjectives he used). There is clearly something unique about their manufacturing process.

This is not to dissuade you. Just providing additional context.

I have found the consistency of the pucks in Amo Pure to consistently be identical to other lypholized powders. Are you repeating hearsay or providing first hand evidence of what you are saying?

 

[nccane]

I have found the consistency of the pucks in Amo Pure to consistently be identical to other lypholized powders. Are you repeating hearsay or providing first hand evidence of what you are saying?

The guy who does testing/COAs on the products and tested 30+ vials in August said it. He has a discord. They can tell from the tests (can tell during the purity test based on what it looks like vs. Others)

There's a group currently working on getting a counterion test done.

 

[MarisWinter]

Thanks for the follow-up. Yeah, I understand, that's why I was asking for the exact words that were used.

I think if you go back to the whole thread, from the very, very beginning, much will be clarified. 😘

 

[nonyabizznez]

I have found the consistency of the pucks in Amo Pure to consistently be identical to other lypholized powders. Are you repeating hearsay or providing first hand evidence of what you are saying?

I have product from Arctic (RIP), Skye, Transforma, Eros, Nexha, QSC, SRY and Amopure. Amo's looks different than all of them and I have T,S & C from them... delicate broken pucks (porous, not solid) no biggie, stuff works. They even tell you their product is produced differently, No mannitol. Mine shipped from China via Hialeah FL. (I'm in GA)

Here's a picture from Amopure of what to expect:

 

[Desertteepee2]

The guy who does testing/COAs on the products and tested 30+ vials in August said it. He has a discord. They can tell from the tests (can tell during the purity test based on what it looks like vs. Others)

There's a group currently working on getting a counterion test done.

“the guy”…sounds very official.
Well…as I said previously…the lypholized powder in Amopure, in my RSs experience, is identical to any they have come across be it Pharma Grade Peptides, Peptide Science Peptides or even Amino Amigos. So
I’m basing my statements on actual hands on observation. Not what “the guy” said on discord.

 

[MiniatureSnail]

“the guy”…sounds very official.
Well…as I said previously…the lypholized powder in Amopure, in my RSs experience, is identical to any they have come across be it Pharma Grade Peptides, Peptide Science Peptides or even Amino Amigos. So
I’m basing my statements on actual hands on observation. Not what “the guy” said on discord.

I have found the consistency of the pucks in Amo Pure to consistently be identical to other lypholized powders. Are you repeating hearsay or providing first hand evidence of what you are saying?

I wouldn't call it hearsay, but if you're asking if I myself observed a difference in texture, then no. I've never purchased Amo and if I did, it wouldn't occur to me to open a lyophilized vial and play with the powder.

The guy who owns/runs PeptideTest.com has a discord. Sorry that I don't know his real name. On that discord, he posted a screen shot of a short conversation between himself and someone from the lab where the peptides are tested where the lab tech mentioned how the consistency is different in the Amo vials. I went and found it after this conversation last time and the exact adjectives he used were "fluffy" and "sticky".

Nothing good or bad was otherwise said about the company. Just an objective observation regarding texture/consistency.

I myself am not saying anything good or bad about Amo. Just sharing some information I came across on a different platform. It wasn't meant to influence anyone's opinion. Feel free to ignore it.

 

[Dee X]

I have product from Artic (RIP), Skye, Transforma, Eros, Nexha, QSC, SRS and Amopure. Amo's looks different than all of them and I have T,S & C from them... delicate broken pucks (porous, not solid) no biggie, stuff works. They even tell you their product is produced differently, No mannitol. Mine shipped from China via Hialeah FL. (I'm in GA)

Here's a picture from Amopure of what to expect:

Their R is like that too btw.

 

[Garbo]

bguz1200 said:
Where can I find this info from PeptideTest? Is it from a video, posted here, or other forum?
Thank you for this. I followed every thread here regarding the group test and thought I read every AmoPure post, I guess I missed this one statement from PeptideTest.
Do you have a screenshot? I'm interested in the exact words he used.

No, sorry. Again, it was mentioned in his discord server, not on this forum. I would have to scroll up through months of chatter looking for it. If it comes up again, I'll take note.

I wonder if perhaps the heroic @Cndmk, who somehow managed to herd a bunch of crazed amo-buying cats into a new kind of group test experiment, might have a record of what the test lab said?
Regardless, @Cndmk, you are a legend, and I hope you have recovered from that gesture of good will 😉 💜

 

[clevesand]

If you're not concerned that one manufacturer thinks they're so much smarter than everyone else that has been producing peps for years and really has a better mousetrap that looks like cocaine instead of T and is burning people, please go ahead and order their mad scientist concoction. If it works, it must be ok.

 

[Siesta]

I reached out to Amo today after finishing a 60mg vial…gained 5 lbs over a month while using their Triz. I had stinging and injection site reactions, which has never occurred since starting Triz in January and did not occur when I switched back to my prior compounded Triz this week. I also had a strong reaction (nausea and lethargy) when I switched back to the compounded Triz at the same dose making me think I’d used an underfilled vial from Amo. Amo sent me a COA implying it correlated with my same batch and showed overfilled vials (62.72 mg; 63.46 mg; 61.48 mg; 63.19 mg). Test was ordered on 7/26/24. However, I’d received the Triz in the same timeframe the big group test was occurring which had multiple slightly under filled vials (but not under filled enough to create the symptoms I had this week). My order shipped from Texas. They told me if I had any prolonged burning or stinging to let them know right away…which I’d already done and did in my next email also. Those symptoms were ignored with a response that I could send out for my own testing and if it demonstrated insufficient qty they’d reship. I was not looking for a replacement but rather wanted to just provide feedback to them. I’d already accepted this will be a $1000+ lose. Wonder if the injection site reaction could be related to their product being made with TFA salts? Not sure if that could cause it or not?

 

[Garbo]

If you're not concerned that one manufacturer thinks they're so much smarter than everyone else that has been producing peps for years and really has a better mousetrap that looks like cocaine instead of T and is burning people, please go ahead and order their mad scientist concoction. If it works, it must be ok.

LOL they *are* fluffy white pucks!

I was very happy with my one and only purchase from Amo (back when they were still Amopeptide) but every time I went to reconstitute another one of their vials, I got flashbacks to some *very* wild times in the cocaine-crazy 1980s Miami.

 

[Garbo]

I reached out to Amo today after finishing a 60mg vial…gained 5 lbs over a month while using their Triz. I had stinging and injection site reactions, which has never occurred since starting Triz in January and did not occur when I switched back to my prior compounded Triz this week. I also had a strong reaction (nausea and lethargy) when I switched back to the compounded Triz at the same dose making me think I’d used an underfilled vial from Amo. Amo sent me a COA implying it correlated with my same batch and showed overfilled vials (62.72 mg; 63.46 mg; 61.48 mg; 63.19 mg). Test was ordered on 7/26/24. However, I’d received the Triz in the same timeframe the big group test was occurring which had multiple slightly under filled vials (but not under filled enough to create the symptoms I had this week). My order shipped from Texas. They told me if I had any prolonged burning or stinging to let them know right away…which I’d already done and did in my next email also. Those symptoms were ignored with a response that I could send out for my own testing and if it demonstrated insufficient qty they’d reship. I was not looking for a replacement but rather wanted to just provide feedback to them. I’d already accepted this will be a $1000+ lose. Wonder if the injection site reaction could be related to their product being made with TFA salts? Not sure if that could cause it or not?

Very sorry you are going through this 💔

 

[scarywood75]

Don't forget that our brain is strong, that's why placebo and nocebo are a thing. If it stings, you may think it won't work and that'll cause it to work less for sure.