SRY Tirz 30 - chlorocresol contamination

DeafJam

GLP-1 Novice
Member Since
Apr 26, 2025
Posts
19
Likes Received
43
From
USA
An FYI for those using SRY, their latest batch of T30 has issues. Seems like they are halfway taking responsibility and halfway blaming Jano. There are rumors that there is more to this, but I’m just sticking to what is published.

I saw this elsewhere and figured it is worthwhile to notify others.

———

From Alan

Official Statement Regarding Recent Janoshik Testing Report Issues

To Our Valued Customers and Partners,

During recent purity testing conducted by Janoshik Analytical on select peptide products, we identified several concerning irregularities. In keeping with our commitment to transparency and accountability, we are issuing this public statement and taking appropriate corrective actions.

  • Unacceptable Processing Time: Reports were delayed up to two weeks post-sample delivery—far exceeding standard turnaround times.
  • HPLC Purity Calculation Errors:
    • After we flagged discrepancies, Janoshik corrected the data without explaining the cause of the errors.
    • Critical Issue: An anomalous peak at 274 nm (inconsistent with peptide characteristics) was erroneously included in purity calculations, artificially deflating results.
  • We paid $170 for GC-MS analysis to identify the unknown substance.
    • Our independent testing confirmed the compound as CAS 99-93-4.
    • Janoshik’s amended report (issued two days later) identified it as p-Chlorocresol but failed to provide:
      • Molecular weight verification
      • Rationale for attributing the 274 nm peak to this compound
  • Our Objections:
    • p-Chlorocresol is a toxic substance requiring government clearance for purchase—our decade of industry expertise precludes its intentional use.
    • Janoshik’s opaque methodology (updating reports without evidentiary support) violates professional standards.
  • Minimal Distribution: Only a small batch was released, as pre-shipment in-house purity/potency testing ensured compliance.
  • Customers Receiving Product: No action is required—we assume full responsibility for resolution.
  • Ongoing Dialogue with Janoshik: We demand:
    • Complete analytical data (MW, 274 nm peak justification)
    • Explanation for contaminant inclusion in purity calculations
    • Clarification on testing delays
  • Zero Tolerance for Harmful Additives: All processes adhere to industry benchmarks.
  • Enhanced Transparency: Implementing third-party verification protocols to prevent recurrence.
We urge Janoshik to address these concerns promptly and uphold their professional obligations.

SRYlab
June 15, 2026

(Key improvements for U.S. audience: Concise phrasing, active voice, emphasis on accountability, and logical flow aligning with Western business communication standards.)
 

Attachments

  • IMG_4417.jpeg
    IMG_4417.jpeg
    99.9 KB · Views: 86
Following this as well seems like the DARVO approach by SRY. I don't see that Jano has responded in any of the servers Jano participates in but the response above from SRY has been posted by others in places Jano will surely see. cautiously waiting for the full story to come out.
 
  • Unacceptable Processing Time: Reports were delayed up to two weeks post-sample delivery—far exceeding standard turnaround timesheet.
If 2 weeks is unacceptable for SRY what does that say for the 100% of products they ship to the US? Alan's off to a great start there!

LMAO I love the AI blurb at the end.
100%! 🤣
 
LMAO I love the AI blurb at the end.

Alan always seems to phrase things in a way that makes him seem like a victim of everyone else. Throw this one on the pile.
Key improvements for U.S. audience: Concise phrasing, active voice, emphasis on accountability, and logical flow aligning with Western business communication standards.)

Apparently prompted that..heh
 
Yeah, I hate to admit this because of my issues with them a few months ago, but when I consider reordering peptides in the future I will look at what SSA has to offer, and avoid SRY. There are enough vendors out there to avoid issues like this. But keep in mind these are just resellers, and they all get their peptides from a core 3 or 4 real Breaking Bad manufacturing labs, so if one vendors wares test bad, high probability that other vendors will have the same issue.
 
Yeah, I hate to admit this because of my issues with them a few months ago, but when I consider reordering peptides in the future I will look at what SSA has to offer, and avoid SRY. There are enough vendors out there to avoid issues like this. But keep in mind these are just resellers, and they all get their peptides from a core 3 or 4 real Breaking Bad manufacturing labs, so if one vendors wares test bad, high probability that other vendors will have the same issue.

A theory by someone on Meso is that Jano spilled the beans on SRY because SRY was not paying their bills on time. So SSA or another vendor may be just as guilty of having unwanted ingredients. We just don't know.
 
Last edited:
A theory by someone on Meso is that Jano spilled the beans on SRY because SRY was not paying their bills on time. So SSA or another vendor may be just as guilty of having unwanted ingredients. We just don't know.
I wouldn't put any weight on that.

But it is true any other vendor could have unwanted ingredients and we wouldn't know. Not because Jano is hiding it, but because that's how HPLC testing works.
 
The antimicrobial disinfectant seems mostly harmless:

p-Chlorocresol does not significantly bioaccumulate in organisms due to low Kow and bioconcentration factors. It is not found to be genotoxic or carcinogenic and has been safely used in human medicine for many years.
A Committee for Veterinary Medicinal Products found p-Chlorocresol to be rapidly metabolized and excreted with no potential to accumulate in tissues and of low toxicity. In rats, up to 95% of the p-Chlorocresol was excreted via the urine and 0.4% in the faeces within 24 hours.

OTOH:

 
Last edited:
God, at this point its just cruel to keep going SRY.

giphy.gif
 
Top Bottom