GLP-1 Forum

I found a new vendor on Finnrick who have a fair few test results. Curious if anyone has heard about them or any other info

Gypsyking

GLP-1 Novice
Member Since
Sep 6, 2025
Posts
15
Likes Received
19
From
Aus
Recently searching through finnrick vendors/test results and come across Stella - Qing Li Peptides

Has anyone used or heard of this company before?

What are your experiences?

I've recently placed an order 19/9/2025

Will send some updates with the process.
 
Last edited:
That's an interesting approach to find a vendor. I hope it works out. Probably shouldn't share the link tho.
Considering they had multiple vials tested. It peaked my interest. Found there website and contact the company. Seemed very professional.

I'll keep everyone updated.
That's an interesting approach to find a vendor. I hope it works out. Probably shouldn't share the link th
 
Recently searching through finnrick vendors/test results and come across Stella - Qing Li Peptides

Has anyone used or heard of this company before?

What are your experiences?

I've recently placed an order 19/9/2025

Will send some updates with the process.
Finnrick uses a worrisome methodology, and features lots of exceedingly overpriced vendors to boot.
 
T
Recently searching through finnrick vendors/test results and come across Stella - Qing Li Peptides

Has anyone used or heard of this company before?

What are your experiences?

I've recently placed an order 19/9/2025

Will send some updates with the process.
Some of their stuff r are rated poorly on fin their purity stuff falls under 98% so leaves more room for impurities
 
Last edited:
Surprised to see so much negativity.
Has everyone jumped the gun before doing any research on the company or is it because they aren't a vendor here? Some of there products on finnrick tested better than SSA and SRY.
They regularly test there products through Janoshik.
I'll keep shit to myself from now on.

Thanks for the advice
 
Surprised to see so much negativity.
Has everyone jumped the gun before doing any research on the company or is it because they aren't a vendor here? Some of there products on finnrick tested better than SSA and SRY.
They regularly test there products through Janoshik.
I'll keep shit to myself from now on.

Thanks for the advice
You seem to be missing the point. Nobody really cares who you spend your money with, or whether or not they're a vendor here. The real concern is that the company you're trusting to help guide your decision has already established a questionable track record and may be basing their "scores" and positioning based on how much certain vendors are willing to pay rather than on their purported independence and testing methods.

Honestly, there probably would have been less criticism/negativity if you said you were relying on ratings that you got from a psychic. 🔮
 
You seem to be missing the point. Nobody really cares who you spend your money with, or whether or not they're a vendor here. The real concern is that the company you're trusting to help guide your decision has already established a questionable track record and may be basing their "scores" and positioning based on how much certain vendors are willing to pay rather than on their purported independence and testing methods.

Honestly, there probably would have been less criticism/negativity if you said you were relying on ratings that you got from a psychic. 🔮
I completely understand what you're saying.

While it's definitely questionable how I come across them, the fact is I've done my due diligence and deep dived the company and found they regularly do Janoshik testing.
I'm not relying on finnricks testing methods and I'll be sending vials for 3rd party testing also.
What I was trying to establish is if anyone else had previous experiences with them.
 
I completely understand what you're saying.

While it's definitely questionable how I come across them, the fact is I've done my due diligence and deep dived the company and found they regularly do Janoshik testing.
I'm not relying on finnricks testing methods and I'll be sending vials for 3rd party testing also.
What I was trying to establish is if anyone else had previous experiences with them.
Not one I've heard of. You said they have a website? That's unusual.
 
Surprised to see so much negativity.
Has everyone jumped the gun before doing any research on the company or is it because they aren't a vendor here? Some of there products on finnrick tested better than SSA and SRY.
They regularly test there products through Janoshik.
I'll keep shit to myself from now on.

Thanks for the advice
Yo, it's all in good fun. Sometimes sarcasm doesn't do well written.
 
I’ve bought off them several times with no real issues. The rep that I deal with is DraLene and the communication is at times miserable but have always received my order in a timely fashion.
 
Surprised to see so much negativity.
Has everyone jumped the gun before doing any research on the company or is it because they aren't a vendor here? Some of there products on finnrick tested better than SSA and SRY.
They regularly test there products through Janoshik.
I'll keep shit to myself from now on.

Thanks for the advice
there purity is low , means risk of endotoxins
 
I’ve bought off them several times with no real issues. The rep that I deal with is DraLene and the communication is at times miserable but have always received my order in a timely fashion.
Glad to hear some feedback.

I've been dealing with Stella.
So far so good, she's sent through all tracking within 2 days of purchase and accompanied with janoshik tests for most recent batches they've tested.

Was about to make another purchase yesterday and while she was happy to oblige was nice to know she prompted me it's a Chinese holiday period and nothing will be sent for 2 weeks.

I'll follow up with delivery times and test results later as it plays out.
 
T

Some of their stuff r are rated poorly on fin their purity stuff falls under 98% so leaves more room for impurities
You misunderstand purity percentages if you think that have a higher purity will help you avoid impurities. The percentage refers to the percentage of molecules similar to the target peptide that are actually the exact target molecule. The percentage does not refer to the percentage of what it's the vial that is the target peptide - in actuality, the target peptide is just a small percentage of what's in the vial. Testing companies test for only a few impurities and do so only only upon request. So what the problem with receiving a peptide with a low purity percentage if the quantity of peptide is sufficient? The problem is that poor lypholization may mean your peptides will degrade faster. As to impurities, when you buy grey, the testing does not guarantee an absence of stuff. There may be all types of harmful chemicals in the vial that cannot be detected.
 
You misunderstand purity percentages if you think that have a higher purity will help you avoid impurities. The percentage refers to the percentage of molecules similar to the target peptide that are actually the exact target molecule. The percentage does not refer to the percentage of what it's the vial that is the target peptide - in actuality, the target peptide is just a small percentage of what's in the vial. Testing companies test for only a few impurities and do so only only upon request. So what the problem with receiving a peptide with a low purity percentage if the quantity of peptide is sufficient? The problem is that poor lypholization may mean your peptides will degrade faster. As to impurities, when you buy grey, the testing does not guarantee an absence of stuff. There may be all types of harmful chemicals in the vial that cannot be detected.
I understand the difference between HPLC which is most tests, LAL Endotoxin, ICP-Ms heavy metals test.

Where I misunderstand and need clarification, if a vial is suppose to contain 10mg BPC and a HPLC actually contains 13mg at 99% does that mean the extra 3mg is potential made up of impurities / fillers / harmful chems.

Is that correct?
 
I understand the difference between HPLC which is most tests, LAL Endotoxin, ICP-Ms heavy metals test.

Where I misunderstand and need clarification, if a vial is suppose to contain 10mg BPC and a HPLC actually contains 13mg at 99% does that mean the extra 3mg is potential made up of impurities / fillers / harmful chems.

Is that correct?
No. The 13 mg is 13 mg of the target peptide. Overfill is good so long as you know about it and reconstitute based upon the actual amount in the vial.
 

Trending Topics

Forum Statistics

Threads
5,703
Posts
73,705
Members
16,350
Newest
zixnhush
Top Bottom