This interesting article proposes dividing patients non-responsible to GLP-1 drugs into three different categories

Can you explain this in lay person?
The article essentially says......when someone doesn’t respond well to GLP-1 receptor agonist therapy, it’s not just because “the drug failed” — it might be because their biology isn’t suited (for now) to that therapy, due to receptor issues, signalling issues, or lack of endogenous hormone release. They argue that this could make it important in recognizing which mechanism is at play can help choose a more appropriate therapy, rather than simply increasing dose or changing drug without any insight. Having said that...they also say that currently there is no simple, validated diagnostics in every day practice to say definitively which “type” a person is.
 
This is very interesting. Thank you for posting. My response to tirz has been somewhat muted compared to many on this forum. I fit the receptor-level resistance profile. I can live with slow and steady. I feel stuck unless I look back siz months at a time.
 
I didn’t respond to Tirzepatide at all for nearly 9 months and only lost about 6 pounds. I was on the highest dose and dealt with awful side effects like bloating, nausea, sulfur burps, fatigue, and just feeling miserable overall.

About 2.5 months ago, I switched to Retatrutide plus Cagrilintide, and I’m already down 33 pounds. Once I added cagri, the food noise basically disappeared. I think we need much more research on non-responders, because I definitely don’t fit into any of the categories described here.
 
Those who have secretory deficiencies which are due to impaired enteroendecrine cell dysfunction? That would seem to explain ( to me anyway ) why some complain of " pronounced GI symptoms at low doses"? I'm not one of 'em ( I'm at 6mg -5 days and have not had any of what I've heard others complain of...YET🤞 ) but they relate their having sulpher burps, diarrhea and other GI issues at extremely low doses making them question whether they should continue use as treatments for weight loss.
It also says that they're "excellent responders to exogenous incretin therapy". Were I one of these super or hyper responders ( whatever the hell label they're given ) I would think I'd be looking into incretin therapy. And like GLP-1s initial introduction it seems that the studies are around T2D.
 
Those who have secretory deficiencies which are due to impaired enteroendecrine cell dysfunction? That would seem to explain ( to me anyway ) why some complain of " pronounced GI symptoms at low doses"? I'm not one of 'em ( I'm at 6mg -5 days and have not had any of what I've heard others complain of...YET🤞 ) but they relate their having sulpher burps, diarrhea and other GI issues at extremely low doses making them question whether they should continue use as treatments for weight loss.
It also says that they're "excellent responders to exogenous incretin therapy". Were I one of these super or hyper responders ( whatever the hell label they're given ) I would think I'd be looking into incretin therapy. And like GLP-1s initial introduction it seems that the studies are around T2D.
impaired enteroendecrine cell dysfunction Bet you can't say that fast five times
 

Trending Topics

Latest Posts

Forum Statistics

Threads
6,975
Posts
85,775
Members
20,485
Newest
working_late
Top Bottom