I agree, particularly with the part I put in bold. Just about all the problems seem to have that as a root cause.
I said before, this type of thing makes it hard to differentiate between sales pitches and sound scientific conclusions. That line should never be blurred, and frankly I think...
Yes!
This stuff makes it hard to differentiate between the sound scientific conclusions and the sales pitches. Once that line has been blurred, trust is compromised. And trust is absolutely critical for a lab. Much more so than a vendor.
He's also said the Cobetter filters are prone to bursting. I'll dig it up in a bit.
I have the Cobetters as well and I've tested the limits. They are quite durable, and the membrane holds up really well. I don’t buy it.
Nope!
He has an exclusive contract with Tisch scientific to sell 4mm filters. No one else is legally allowed to sell them. This was proven on Peppys, receipts were shown. The thread isn't hard to find.
And 4mm filters are damn near impossible to find. A few months ago, I started the thread...
Quite possible. But I've followed this vendor by far the longest of any of the Chinese and my gut is telling me this was deliberate.
Given the past backlash that came last time this was discovered, maybe they just realized it's better to be up front about this stuff. To be clear I'm absolutely...
Just a theory, so keep that in mind, but I've long suspected QSC uses blends to hide low bad/low purity raws since purity can't be measured in a Jano test for a blend.
Not the first time they've done this, but last time it was discovered in a 3rd party test.
This was a 2nd party test linked to in their promo price list. Nice of them to let their customers know when they are buying a shit product. In a weird way, I actually view the fact that they were...
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.