Amopure L60 - broken; fluffy (?), no sting, effective

Grannuaile

New Member
Joined
Nov 12, 2024
Messages
6
Reaction score
4
Location
1!GLP1
IMG_0126.jpeg
Ordered after inquiring and receiving this email when I asked if I could receive product from US warehouse (I fixed typos b/c I can’t stand not to):

Hello! Thank you for your inquiry!

We use the special line to send from China. Using the special line to send is easier to get through customs safely.

So far all our shipments by the special line have arrived safely. Please rest assured!

Our company can promise:

If confiscated by customs we will send again free of charge. Normally, we ship randomly from China or US warehouse. But L60 in US warehouse has just sold out, and a new batch of inventory will arrive in about 3 days.

If required, you can note when placing your order: Shipping from US warehouse. In the meantime, I'll make a note for you. I hope it helps.

Please feel free to contact me if you have any further questions. Thanks & best regards!

Binh

Paid via credit card upon receiving a link showing I was buying one hundred shirts (this is where it really starts to feel shady, no?). LOTS of really good tracking updates, but too busy to notice if they were correct or accurate; they too looked less than consumer-ready and more commercial. Received on the Thirtieth. This was tested concurrent to a bunch of us getting L60 on that date, but hey, who knows if these are the same batches. Tried it yesterday — I usually wait 24 hours to make sure that I am experiencing appetite suppression/satiety and no ISR; all good. No, I didn’t filter — I always ALWAYS swab the vial tops before doing anything. I know others had issues with stinging - but I did not.
 
I think the cake should not be broken like this? It should be fluffy not dense like a cracked piece of rock. Will you send a vial for testing?
 
I think the cake should not be broken like this? It should be fluffy not dense like a cracked piece of rock. Will you send a vial for testing?
Amo is notorious for broken pucks. It's not a big deal. I have some QSC with broken pucks too. Just a rough ride over the Pacific I guess.
 
I think the cake should not be broken like this? It should be fluffy not dense like a cracked piece of rock. Will you send a vial for testing?
I have received a few orders from AMO and most of their vials do not have intact pucks. I had heard they use a different filler that is "fluffier" and doesn't compact the same and that's why the pucks don't stay intact. Their product has been tested and the testing facility has also commented on the different composition/feel of the filler as compared to other manufacturers. But all their stuff from what I have seen has tested good, maybe a bit underdosed on occasion but not across the board.
 
I’m a nitpicker. And I am annoyed. I can’t get any clarity on how physically sensitive these little chains of proteins are – I mean, none of it makes any rhyme or reason to me.

On one hand, we have reconstituters who are gently swaying tiny vials to make the powder dissolve. Meanwhile, relative to compounded, there are gorillas throwing boxes of vials into and out of however many trucks.

So similarly, I cannot understand what’s going on with the physicality of the powders and whether if they’re broken, it means anything or just aesthetically is displeasing.
 
I think the cake should not be broken like this? It should be fluffy not dense like a cracked piece of rock. Will you send a vial for testing?
Tl;dr. “This was tested concurrent to a bunch of us getting L60 on that date, but hey, who knows if these are the same batches.”
 
Tl;dr. “This was tested concurrent to a bunch of us getting L60 on that date, but hey, who knows if these are the same batches.”
There have been other tests as well. Most recently someone even got it tested for free TFA and it came back negative.

whether or not the pucks are broken is completely meaningless.
 
I’m a nitpicker. And I am annoyed. I can’t get any clarity on how physically sensitive these little chains of proteins are – I mean, none of it makes any rhyme or reason to me.

On one hand, we have reconstituters who are gently swaying tiny vials to make the powder dissolve. Meanwhile, relative to compounded, there are gorillas throwing boxes of vials into and out of however many trucks.

So similarly, I cannot understand what’s going on with the physicality of the powders and whether if they’re broken, it means anything or just aesthetically is displeasing.
I don't think they are that fragile. I don't remember if it was jano or someone else, but I remember seeing something where a vial was vigorously shaken while reconstituted and there was very little, if any, degradation that occurred.
 
I’m a nitpicker. And I am annoyed. I can’t get any clarity on how physically sensitive these little chains of proteins are – I mean, none of it makes any rhyme or reason to me.

On one hand, we have reconstituters who are gently swaying tiny vials to make the powder dissolve. Meanwhile, relative to compounded, there are gorillas throwing boxes of vials into and out of however many trucks.

So similarly, I cannot understand what’s going on with the physicality of the powders and whether if they’re broken, it means anything or just aesthetically is displeasing.
These molecules are not fragile. You can spray your bacteriostatic water into the vial, you can vigorously shake the vial to mix it, you can drop a vial, break up the pucks..... It's still going to work as intended.
 

Trending content

Latest posts

Forum statistics

Threads
1,665
Messages
25,856
Members
3,228
Latest member
moriero
Back
Top