Anyone trial >12 mg Reta or stalled on high dose reta?

catdog

GLP-1 Enthusiast
Member Since
Jun 8, 2024
Posts
197
Likes Received
278
From
somewhere
Hey all,

For some background, I've been on GLPs for >1.5 yrs. Started on Tirz, maxed out and stalled at 15mg. Switched to reta about 3 months ago and am currently at Reta 10mg. On my switch I regained about 10 lbs but reduced 3 of those lbs on reta so far. So net -7 lbs. Just wondering how people have done on Reta high dose? Has anyone stalled? Has anyone tried higher dose than 12mg? I know research wise that is uncharted, but was just curious.

Thanks all!
 
Oh man, this makes me not even want to try Reta. I’m n 18mg Tirz and have been stalled for months and it’s not as effective anymore, definitely don’t wanna go through another transition just to be maxed out again 🫤
 
Oh wow! Nope. Not I. I just bumped to 6mg Tirz. I’m near goal now. Moving to Reta soon, after I kill off the remaining Tirz. Would like to see if I can start eating more and see how Reta does for when I start lifting again.
 
Oh man, this makes me not even want to try Reta. I’m n 18mg Tirz and have been stalled for months and it’s not as effective anymore, definitely don’t wanna go through another transition just to be maxed out again 🫤
I wouldn’t let this discourage you. I’m not maxed on Reta yet, just was curious preemptively. I don’t regret switching honestly
 
Im
Thats great, notice any big difference between 12 and 15 mg?
I’m a moderate Reta underresponder. But I have better side effects with it than with tirz. So I hardly felt suppression until like 10ish. 12 feels decent, 15 feels better. Both are still weaker than 5 of tirz was for me lol.
 
Does anyone have a copy of the graph that lists and compares different amounts of GLP-1, GIP and Glucogon in the 3 primary weight-loss peptides (Sema, Tirz, Reta)???

Please?
 
1000006441.png

Someone posted the table above in the survo subforum here. I verified most of the KI values before as being what is in the research literature:

But for survo, all I know for sure is the 8:1 ratio between GLP and glucagon was mentioned in the research.

Very different GLP estimates for maz and survo from a different table on TG:

1000006402.jpg
 
Last edited:
I have seen 2 different GIP binding affinities for tirz and reta, one shows tirz being stronger ( lower ki ) and the other the opposite. As both these peptides have a long fat molecule attached to them they strongly bind to albumin, so nearly all of the drug in the bloodstream exists bound to this protein, which alters the way they interact with receptors and gives them the week or so long half lives. So some of the ki numbers are for the drugs bound to albumin and some are not. My reading and pharmacology are not quite good enough to be certain which actually has the stronger effect on gip receptors, but probably tirzepatide. for glp-1 tirz is stronger either way, and semaglutide much stronger.
 


Here, survo significantly outperformed Sema on head-to-head comparisons for blood glucose and weight loss. However, the tested Sema dose never exceeded 1 mg./week so I'm not sure it's a fair comparison. Moreover, the study doesn't appear to cast light on whether outcomes resulted from Glucagon or GLP-1 factors although it's implied that the Glucagon agonist was responsible.
 

Treatment algorithm for obesity (I don't understand why Reta wasn't included under NASH):


View attachment 8535
Flow chart lives matter!

For the green rectangles, they should approve 3mg Reta every 72hrs as effective.
 
Top Bottom