Discrepancy between measured waist size and waist size on pants

Buy 10 brands of pants the same size, all will fit different. Companys like to make you feel less fat too, look at a 1940-1950s size large compared to today.
 
My 34" waist pants are beginning to be a little loose. I bought some 32" waist pants and they fit. Yet when I measured my waist at the thinnest place between the hips and the ribs, I measured 36 1/2." Why is there a discrepancy?
Good question.

Personally I think the clothing cartel is screwing with all the numbers since different manufacturers fit so differently. I've been wearing 32" since earlier this spring, and I bet if I were to actually measure my waist it would not be 32" but more like you in that 36"+ area. Plus I have some jeans that are 34" but have a much tighter fit than most of the 32" waist stuff I wear.
 
My 34" waist pants are beginning to be a little loose. I bought some 32" waist pants and they fit. Yet when I measured my waist at the thinnest place between the hips and the ribs, I measured 36 1/2." Why is there a discrepancy?
Yeah even Tshirts are the same, you buy L from one guy and it measures 22" the other guy 21.5" its all about saving material and money.
 
This is an area I'm somewhat knowledgeable. I've measured thousands of pairs of pants... both inseam and waist. It's best to consider tag sizing as a guideline. Remember, when they make these jeans they have to cut the patterns with allowances to sew them together. They never measure before they sew, so there's natural variation there (+/- an inch as a rule). Patterns are usually cut by machine though, which is a round about way of measuring before cutting.

Levi's - Tag sizes should be considered a guideline. Inseam is usually 2-3" shorter than stated. Waist is usually a bit tighter in tolerance. Not much. Also consider their "shrink to fit" era, which is vintage now and I believe they still make occasional shrink to fit release Levi's (don't quote me on that).

I could go through the brands, but Levi's seems to be a stand out when it comes to larger variances.

Add spandex to the fabric and all bets are off. They'll fit well out of the dryer but toward the end of the day they'll sag. Hate that spandex wave too...

Tell me which brand of jeans and I can tell you my experience.

Some brands also use "vanity sizing".... they want you to feel good wearing their products and suddenly you fit into a Large when you were an XL to begin with. Tommy Bahama comes to mind with vanity sizing. At least their camp shirts....
 
Last edited:
This is one of those situations where I'm not sure whether gratitude or fear is the appropriate response.

I will say that usually clothing will measure smaller than tag size. It's somewhat rare to find items with a tag of 32" that measure a 36". What brand if I may ask?

I ignored rise... Low rise jeans sit lower and high rise... well you get it. I think sometimes brands will put the generally accepted waist size on a tag for the cut but that's not how they'll measure due to where they sit..... if they're not mid-rise pants.

Also, I think there's a special place in hell for whoever invented women's sizing. Numbers that don't really correlate to anything. If I had it my way, we'd just use the metric system for everything.
 
I'm going to stop at wally world and grab a tailor's tape this week since trying to measure myself with a Stanley tape measure is clearly not part of the intended design. 🤪
 
My 34" waist pants are beginning to be a little loose. I bought some 32" waist pants and they fit. Yet when I measured my waist at the thinnest place between the hips and the ribs, I measured 36 1/2." Why is there a discrepancy?
draw a line where the top of your pants hit. measure there. That point is different on so many styles, its very hard to know unless you try them on, and even then the inconsisitency in sewers means it might be different between pairs of pants!
 

Trending Topics

Forum Statistics

Threads
4,628
Posts
64,287
Members
12,157
Newest
Jenny
Top Bottom