Do you guys dose based on the vial or the COA?

[blueandazure]

Im used to taking 5mg, triz from the white market. I purchased some 30mg vials, but the COA says 33.68mg. Should I use it with the assumption its 30mg or 33.68mg?

 

[Calm Logic]

You could go either way.

There is a lot of margin for error anyway. I used to titrate up 2.5 mg every week on tirz (rather than every four weeks), per my doctor's prescription, but I stopped by 10 mg due to sides.

 

[Zydeceltico]

Im used to taking 5mg, triz from the white market. I purchased some 30mg vials, but the COA says 33.68mg. Should I use it with the assumption its 30mg or 33.68mg?

I came to the grey from compounding last June and had the same question given that there is so much variance in fill reported on a COA.

After realizing that whatever COA I was looking at might have 3 fills reported and they all would be different and they would only be 3 vials of thousands that would all likely be different - -I gave up. LOL

My personal rule of thumb is that, unless a COA shows >15% overfill, I just recon w/ 2ml and divide the intended mg by 4 and call it a day. I very likely have a larger dose than intended but there's so much margin of error that - FOR ME - that's totally acceptable. That said, I apparently have a fairly robust metabolism and I have zero other underlying health considerations.

I start getting OCD with recon amount and dosing when a batch shows consistent UNDERfill in the COAs. That's my quirk. 🙂

 

[BH_LOVER]

I usually go by the label. I also, until recently, have bought from a retailer and their vials ran 22mgs or so for their 20mg Tirz. I'm not dosing at the highest dosage, so I think I will be ok sticking with that practice.

 

[Peotidethrowaway]

Coa usually

 

[Retazempic]

Depends.

Assuming I trust the COA, it depends on the % difference between the nominal mass (i.e., the mg given by the vendor) and the mass on the COA. If the COA mass is within +/- 10% of the nominal mass, I go by the nominal mass. Otherwise, I generally go by the mass in the COA.

I haven’t yet decided what to do when there’s a material difference between the nominal purity and the purity on the COA. I’d be interested to hear how others address situations where a trusted COA indicates purity is sub 98%.

 

[thatkatmat]

It's a good question and one i had before I started really using grey. The problems I found with using the COA's is the fact that most COA's have 2,3 or even 4 test vials, so adding them and dividing by the number of vials sounds good, but really, it's not accurate. The second issue I have is that Finnerick shows you what the vial says, what the COA's say and what the actual amount in the vial is. With my supplier, usually the overfill stated on the COA is less, or considerably less than the COA (sometimes it's over but not often).
I used the COA's amounts to calculate my 1st vial of Tirz after using White label Zep. The effect wasn't anywhere near white label. The next vial I went by Vial amount (in my case 20mg's) and the effect was identical to ZEP...So for me, doing my own research told me to go by the amount that's on the label.
But I would understand the opposite as well.
Cheers and good luck!

 

[FNG33]

A lot of vendor COA'S showing overfill have been shown to be BS based upon 3P testing.

 

[Foggy-Hollow]

COA mg. There’s going to be variances no matter what but the COA will give you an average data point to center on, and it’ll minimize how inexact your dose is that vial/kit.

Some people will dose by feel. IMO it’s better to measure what you can do when things go unexpectedly you can troubleshoot easier.

Edit to add: third party COA.

 

[blueandazure]

A lot of vendor COA'S showing overfill have been shown to be BS based upon 3P testing.

Source? It would be hard to do as I doubt vendors would be getting seperate testing vials from the factory.

 

[Calm Logic]

Most third-party tests I have seen have about 10 percent overfill or so.

 

[Retazempic]

Most third-party tests I have seen have about 10 percent overfill or so.

Carnac sees some link-begging in your future

 

[miss-sanne]

Just the vial, and enjoying some unexpected extra juice !

 

[YoYoFat]

I go by COA and use a larger amount of BAC to reduce huge variations in dose.

 

[woundcarping]

I just go off the vial. COA seem nice, but we have no guarantee that there is actual batching, that those batches are what we received, etc.

So I don't overthink it, just take the vial as a nominal amount, and not titrating up on a new vial could be a solid strategy.

 

[latviantower]

I initially dose by the vial and then adjust by feelz.

We talk a lot about fill variability in the gray world. Does anyone have any degree of confidence that compounding doesn’t present the same degree of variability? Or BP with their name brand stuff? I can’t imagine they would be concerned so long as they stay +/-10%.

 

[Calm Logic]

BTW, an example of things going wrong, titrating up (on an already higher dose) without accounting for overfill:

I was on 8mg. But because that new kit from GYC was 50mg I increased to 10mg the morning before the hiccups started.

After the hiccups started I joined a test group and we sent 3 vials to Jano. All three were around 58mg each. So in reality I took almost 12mg the day before my nightmare began. So maybe going from 8 to 12 caused the issues.

It is always safer anyway to start with a baby dose when trying a new kit, like just in case you get reta instead of tirz.

I initially dose by the vial and then adjust by feelz.

I'm with you on the feelz since I am a stacker, most recently with orfo.

 

[domiboy]

Stick to vial. My RS has a high tolerance to most every pep. Probably from early raver days. Rarely gets side effects outside of ISR.