Looks like similar percentage overages from MIX COAs as wellI ordered KLOW 80 from ABC. This is the report that followed, so this is really KLOW 116?
So would you research based on the amount of GHK-Cu? Supposed to be 50, but actually 73.55.
The GHK is a 47% overage
The TB is a 54% overage
The BPC is a 40% overage
The KPV is a 29% overage
Thoughts?
View attachment 8946
Someone in another thread noticed that a couple of them had matching BTC wallet addressesWeird cuz ABC jeep and mix all showed up the same week from what I see...
Someone mentioned Mix and Jeep had the same crypto address.Weird cuz ABC jeep and mix all showed up the same week from what I see...
As research... - one could still include this in the research protocol. It has all the "components" although they may be in different ratios - the ratio's you've seen around are not "official" and thus one can adjust them as needed. A researcher could also add additional amounts of one or more of the products into the reconstituted mix to produce a ratio that is different from this ratio, if one wanted. In my humble opinion (and it is just my opinion) - not all peptides need to be down to the exact mcg -- especially those that are less dose dependent. I would not include GLPs, for example, in this. For GLPs and some other categories (HGH, etc.) I'd be very conscious of the exact doses, but on something like this, my thought is some smaller variances one way or another isn't going to make as much of a difference. As always, keeping good notes or diary entries about every research protocol's effects will help validate this for each researcher.I ordered KLOW 80 from ABC. This is the report that followed, so this is really KLOW 116?
So would you research based on the amount of GHK-Cu? Supposed to be 50, but actually 73.55.
The GHK is a 47% overage
The TB is a 54% overage
The BPC is a 40% overage
The KPV is a 29% overage
Thoughts?
View attachment 8946