GLP-1 Forum

Huge overage on KLOW80, questions on dosing.

Jfrick11

GLP-1 Apprentice
Member Since
Jan 18, 2025
Posts
41
Likes Received
70
From
Mexico
I ordered KLOW 80 from ABC. This is the report that followed, so this is really KLOW 116?

So would you research based on the amount of GHK-Cu? Supposed to be 50, but actually 73.55.
The GHK is a 47% overage
The TB is a 54% overage
The BPC is a 40% overage
The KPV is a 29% overage

Thoughts?


1758907798339.png
 
I ordered KLOW 80 from ABC. This is the report that followed, so this is really KLOW 116?

So would you research based on the amount of GHK-Cu? Supposed to be 50, but actually 73.55.
The GHK is a 47% overage
The TB is a 54% overage
The BPC is a 40% overage
The KPV is a 29% overage

Thoughts?


View attachment 8946
Looks like similar percentage overages from MIX COAs as well
 
I ordered KLOW 80 from ABC. This is the report that followed, so this is really KLOW 116?

So would you research based on the amount of GHK-Cu? Supposed to be 50, but actually 73.55.
The GHK is a 47% overage
The TB is a 54% overage
The BPC is a 40% overage
The KPV is a 29% overage

Thoughts?


View attachment 8946
As research... - one could still include this in the research protocol. It has all the "components" although they may be in different ratios - the ratio's you've seen around are not "official" and thus one can adjust them as needed. A researcher could also add additional amounts of one or more of the products into the reconstituted mix to produce a ratio that is different from this ratio, if one wanted. In my humble opinion (and it is just my opinion) - not all peptides need to be down to the exact mcg -- especially those that are less dose dependent. I would not include GLPs, for example, in this. For GLPs and some other categories (HGH, etc.) I'd be very conscious of the exact doses, but on something like this, my thought is some smaller variances one way or another isn't going to make as much of a difference. As always, keeping good notes or diary entries about every research protocol's effects will help validate this for each researcher.
 
To follow up on the Goodkitty's post. It seems like the GHK-Cu is probably the one to ratio reconstitution with (it has the most side effects and dominates weight), but using either the total weight or the most over filled is a reasonable alternative. The key is to reconstitute to pin whatever protocol you're planning on researching (eg 2.5mg GHK-Cu daily ?) and that may mean a lot of BAC to dilute, but at 3ml 10u would be pretty close to the relatively high example provided. Without adding other components you won't get them to match exactly, but I wouldn't expect to be closer than a unit on volume either which is ~10% variation, and that's assuming you trust the vendor COA.

Up to you. Use the calculators.
Let's be careful out there.
 
Top Bottom