List of labs and their vendors?

leeann82

GLP-1 Apprentice
Member Since
Mar 19, 2026
Posts
60
Likes Received
192
Location
Bc. CANADA
Canada
I was lurking in one of my TG groups yesterday and someone posted a docx that showed which vendors used the same labs. It showed only 5 labs, each having a list of who they supply to. I thought I saved it on my phone, but I guess not....and of course, I can't remember which vendors group I was in. Anyone have it? Trying to avoid a certain batch of tirz30 that doesnt seem to be working from my current vendor.
 
I don’t have it but I also am interested if you find it

ETA: I think I found one similar, maybe not the exact document you’re referring to. @leeann82 @HereKittyKitty
 

Attachments

Last edited:
I don’t have it but I also am interested if you find it

ETA: I think I found one similar, maybe not the exact document you’re referring to. @leeann82 @HereKittyKitty
I’m not sure if this is what OP was looking for or not, but wanted to clarify that this analysis was posted in the forum. You can look at these posts to see the basis that @5byfive used.

Post in thread 'Endotoxin Warning'
https://glp1forum.com/threads/endotoxin-warning.14385/post-146580

 
That list reflects likely supply chains. I am working to add a bunch of new COAs I just got access to (I have to work on formatting and making sure all the names line up) and now that I've made it to Apprentice status, I'll be making a full post with methods and updated results soon. Should be either today or tomorrow.
 
That list reflects likely supply chains. I am working to add a bunch of new COAs I just got access to (I have to work on formatting and making sure all the names line up) and now that I've made it to Apprentice status, I'll be making a full post with methods and updated results soon. Should be either today or tomorrow.
I thought HPT and HKMS are linked but they’re not on the list so I suspect they have a larger parent company
 
That list reflects likely supply chains. I am working to add a bunch of new COAs I just got access to (I have to work on formatting and making sure all the names line up) and now that I've made it to Apprentice status, I'll be making a full post with methods and updated results soon. Should be either today or tomorrow.
Thank you for your time and energy to work on this.
 
That list reflects likely supply chains. I am working to add a bunch of new COAs I just got access to (I have to work on formatting and making sure all the names line up) and now that I've made it to Apprentice status, I'll be making a full post with methods and updated results soon. Should be either today or tomorrow.
Thank you so much for making this! It's very interesting.
I did notice that BFF appears to be on the list twice, grouped differently. Once as bfflink and once as bfflist amo, was this intentional or a mistake? They could have switched suppliers I suppose
 
"The four Chinese companies indicted include: Guangzhou Tengyue Chemical Company, Ltd., Guanghzou Wanjiang Biotechnology Co., Ltd., Hebei Hongjun New Material Technology Co., Ltd. and Hebei Feilaimi Technology Co., Ltd., an FBI spokesperson confirmed to Fox News Digital."


There is one problem with this. Some of the manufacturers were taken out. We don't know who was buying from who. And who replaced their supplier. The above article, and the post in the link, describes the timeline of Sept 2025.

Any data that links certain vendors previous to this shakeup may not be currently accurate.

Sept. 2025 was also the timeline of the demise of SRY and SSA
 
Thank you so much for making this! It's very interesting.
I did notice that BFF appears to be on the list twice, grouped differently. Once as bfflink and once as bfflist amo, was this intentional or a mistake? They could have switched suppliers I suppose
Thats the way it was in the data I pulled. I wasn't familiar with them at the time. I'll clean it up when I add the new data. Thanks.
 

There is one problem with this. Some of the manufacturers were taken out. We don't know who was buying from who. And who replaced their supplier. The above article, and the post in the link, describes the timeline of Sept 2025.

Any data that links certain vendors previous to this shakeup may not be currently accurate.

Sept. 2025 was also the timeline of the demise of SRY and SSA
There is no way it can be perfect but hopefully its still useful. There are definitely limitations that I'll get into when I post the latest version. When I do the next pass, I'll have it emphasize newer data. Thanks for the heads up.
 
Last edited:
I thought HPT and HKMS are linked but they’re not on the list so I suspect they have a larger parent company
They are. HPT confirmed it when a couple of us asked why they were posting the exact same inventory sheets. See a couple of comments starting here 👇

Post in thread '12.10 USA warehouse sotck'
https://glp1forum.com/threads/12-10-usa-warehouse-sotck.8512/post-108444


And then this post as well:

Take care!!! some fraudsters are using the HPT test reports to impersonate us.
https://glp1forum.com/threads/take-...-the-hpt-test-reports-to-impersonate-us.9991/
 
Last edited:
There is no way it can be perfect but hopefully its still useful. There are definitely limitations that I'll get into when I post the latest version. When I do the next pass, I'll have it emphasize newer data. Thanks for the heads up.
I totally get it. And it's a good thing. I study Jano tests and cap colors constantly. And I have always thought it would be nice to know the manufacturing sources of the vendors.
 

There is one problem with this. Some of the manufacturers were taken out. We don't know who was buying from who. And who replaced their supplier. The above article, and the post in the link, describes the timeline of Sept 2025.

Any data that links certain vendors previous to this shakeup may not be currently accurate.

Sept. 2025 was also the timeline of the demise of SRY and SSA
I ran it with instructions to bias towards recent results if patterns changed and that moved 6 vendors to different groups so that may very well be due to the situation you pointed out. I'll have the write-up and updated results tomorrow.
 
I would still take this linking with a grain of salt. Raw and finisher are different roles to start and it may vary by peptide. I checked a couple of examples that I'm not allowed to post about here due to my newbie status that didn't make sense given the data I've seen. There's also the issues with the provenance of the data itself (again I can't name, sorry for the weird wording).

Please don't take this too negatively, I think it's a really interesting analysis and theory, but people should be aware the data to support it is pretty loose.
 

Trending Topics

Forum Statistics

Threads
17,727
Posts
184,102
Members
59,559
Newest
harryballs
Back
Top Bottom