my reviews of 4 products:
tranylcypromine sulfate: rather weird effects, immediate effects after a dose seem mainly noradrenergic. some people have reported about differences in effects between different pharma brands of tcp. effects of dideu tcp are a lot different from the effects of two other versions of tcp i used before. i can't imagine someone would find it pleasant other than for using it in a similar way as really speedy things with no accompanying pro-cognitive effects. efficacy is also lower.
guanfacine hydrochloride: low efficacy and it's hard to tell if it does anything other than lower blood pressure (guanfacine should lower blood pressure). i should mention that i increased my tcp dose with the leftover i still had from my previous supplier and it has guanfacine-like effects too. nevertheless i often had the feeling of reduced positive guanfacine effects lately. also what i noticed with the guanfacine i previously had was if i went above 1,5 mg per dose i would get quite strong emotional numbness immediately after taking the dose. i tried taking up to 6 mg of dideu guanfacine per dose without this effect appearing at all and it's hard to believe the increase in tcp is responsible for the 'lacking' numbness at that guan dose. lowered blood pressure became too problematic (only) at that dose of the dideu guan.
enclomiphene citrate: with previous enclo i had (deus medical) i got significant nipple sensitivity at 25 mg a day plus other high estrogen sides like melancholic mood. i get zero of these sides with dideu enclo at 25 mg a day. it still works but efficacy is certainly lower than with my previous enclo and the lacking estrogen sides are worrying.
trazodone: works fine!! about the same efficacy as pharma trazodone but the price was only slightly lower than for pharma.
for the other 3 products prices were low. enclo at qsc price level, tranylcypromine and guanfacine low-priced too.
a number of research articles (e.g., on sciencedirect) mention them as their source for products used, that made them seem trustworthy. (maybe they use quality stuff for commercial/research orders and send low quality to individuals? no idea if that's a practice some vendors use.)
tranylcypromine sulfate: rather weird effects, immediate effects after a dose seem mainly noradrenergic. some people have reported about differences in effects between different pharma brands of tcp. effects of dideu tcp are a lot different from the effects of two other versions of tcp i used before. i can't imagine someone would find it pleasant other than for using it in a similar way as really speedy things with no accompanying pro-cognitive effects. efficacy is also lower.
guanfacine hydrochloride: low efficacy and it's hard to tell if it does anything other than lower blood pressure (guanfacine should lower blood pressure). i should mention that i increased my tcp dose with the leftover i still had from my previous supplier and it has guanfacine-like effects too. nevertheless i often had the feeling of reduced positive guanfacine effects lately. also what i noticed with the guanfacine i previously had was if i went above 1,5 mg per dose i would get quite strong emotional numbness immediately after taking the dose. i tried taking up to 6 mg of dideu guanfacine per dose without this effect appearing at all and it's hard to believe the increase in tcp is responsible for the 'lacking' numbness at that guan dose. lowered blood pressure became too problematic (only) at that dose of the dideu guan.
enclomiphene citrate: with previous enclo i had (deus medical) i got significant nipple sensitivity at 25 mg a day plus other high estrogen sides like melancholic mood. i get zero of these sides with dideu enclo at 25 mg a day. it still works but efficacy is certainly lower than with my previous enclo and the lacking estrogen sides are worrying.
trazodone: works fine!! about the same efficacy as pharma trazodone but the price was only slightly lower than for pharma.
for the other 3 products prices were low. enclo at qsc price level, tranylcypromine and guanfacine low-priced too.
a number of research articles (e.g., on sciencedirect) mention them as their source for products used, that made them seem trustworthy. (maybe they use quality stuff for commercial/research orders and send low quality to individuals? no idea if that's a practice some vendors use.)
Last edited:
