Novo Nordisk shares tumble as weight-loss drug trial data disappoints

penewbie

Member
Joined
Oct 21, 2024
Messages
164
Reaction score
476
Location
somewhere over the rainbow



CagriSema helped patients lose an average of 22.7 per cent of their body weight in a late-stage trial, Novo Nordisk said on Friday, only marginally beating the results of Mounjaro, a rival treatment from Eli Lilly.Novo Nordisk had targeted an average of 25 per cent weight loss from its new drug.Martin Holst Lange, the company’s executive vice-president for development, said that only 57 per cent of patients had received the highest dose of the drug. “We are encouraged by the weight-loss profile of CagriSema,” he said.The drugmaker’s shares were down as much as 27 per cent in mid-morning trading in Denmark before mounting a partial recovery to trade 20 per cent lower.
 
The analysis I saw was that this makes cagrisema a competitor to tirzepatide, not retatrutide. That would significantly change their position in the market over the next several years.
Exactly on the money.

Novo just lost the GLP1 race. It is still going do make semi truck loads of money, but not nearly as much as they and the stock market expected.
 
The analysis I saw was that this makes cagrisema a competitor to tirzepatide, not retatrutide. That would significantly change their position in the market over the next several years.

I understand why the stock dropped but they still have time to course correct. They have other weight loss medications in their pipeline, and I believe they are trying out other combinations, not just Cagrilinitide and Semaglutide.

I am also curious about which GLP1 will end up being least harmful for human health long term. It sounds like MariTide, while very effective, resulted in some bone density loss. I'm sure we will see similar issues emerge for other GLP-1s down the line.
 
I understand why the stock dropped but they still have time to course correct. They have other weight loss medications in their pipeline, and I believe they are trying out other combinations, not just Cagrilinitide and Semaglutide.

I am also curious about which GLP1 will end up being least harmful for human health long term. It sounds like MariTide, while very effective, resulted in some bone density loss. I'm sure we will see similar issues emerge for other GLP-1s down the line.
The wallstreetbets guys should have asked us. We all knew cagrisema would be similar to tirz and not substantially better.
 
CagriSema helped patients lose an average of 22.7 per cent of their body weight in a late-stage trial, Novo Nordisk said on Friday, only marginally beating the results of Mounjaro, a rival treatment from Eli Lilly.Novo Nordisk had targeted an average of 25 per cent weight loss from its new drug
So it seems like Novo’s biggest mistake was publicly overestimating their target by a few percent. The results don’t necessarily make the drug look bad—there’s a tradeoff sometimes to losing the most weight the quickest on a drug. But whether it confers any edge over Tirz calls for comparative 2+ year studies.

“Barclays analyst Emily Field said the market was having an “emotional reaction” to Novo Nordisk not hitting the 25 per cent weight loss bar that it had set.”
I don’t disagree with that! Stocks are notoriously reactively driven by emotions. 😆 The numbers don’t look bad here.

“Field added that the company had told her it was disappointed and was trying to work out why so many patients had not taken the highest dose of the drug.”
Why the push for needing patients on the highest dose when the study was barely over a year long? The fact that it works so well at a lower dose seems like good news.

Anecdotally, we have heard here that many on cagri still feel extreme lethargy, not dissimilar to tirz, and occasionally worse, no?
 
Don't forget that the US is still a filthy capitalist society that is compromised by pharma. Novo will make it cheaper and insurance companies will force patients to use it and approve very few prior authorizations for tirz. It's still possible it makes more money than Tirz in the US

Spot on. Everyone is still being told that these medications need to be taken for life and at $1k per month, most will quickly approach the cost of bariatric surgery. I absolutely believe that insurance companies will stick you on the cheapest ones and only let you move up if you stop losing weight or are a nonresponder.
 
Exactly on the money.

Novo just lost the GLP1 race. It is still going do make semi truck loads of money, but not nearly as much as they and the stock market expected.
The company that brings an oral med with over 25% average weight loss to market first will be the true winner
 
Spot on. Everyone is still being told that these medications need to be taken for life and at $1k per month, most will quickly approach the cost of bariatric surgery. I absolutely believe that insurance companies will stick you on the cheapest ones and only let you move up if you stop losing weight or are a nonresponder.
That's gonna be generic sema in about 5-8 years. No profit for NN.
 
So it seems like Novo’s biggest mistake was publicly overestimating their target by a few percent. The results don’t necessarily make the drug look bad—there’s a tradeoff sometimes to losing the most weight the quickest on a drug. But whether it confers any edge over Tirz calls for comparative 2+ year studies.

“Barclays analyst Emily Field said the market was having an “emotional reaction” to Novo Nordisk not hitting the 25 per cent weight loss bar that it had set.”
I don’t disagree with that! Stocks are notoriously reactively driven by emotions. 😆 The numbers don’t look bad here.

“Field added that the company had told her it was disappointed and was trying to work out why so many patients had not taken the highest dose of the drug.”
Why the push for needing patients on the highest dose when the study was barely over a year long? The fact that it works so well at a lower dose seems like good news.

Anecdotally, we have heard here that many on cagri still feel extreme lethargy, not dissimilar to tirz, and occasionally worse, no?
Much worse than tirz. I'm guessing that people didn't go to the highest dose because of side effects mainly.

22% is a great result, good news for all of us here that the market options are expanding
 
Don't forget that the US is still a filthy capitalist society that is compromised by pharma. Novo will make it cheaper and insurance companies will force patients to use it and approve very few prior authorizations for tirz. It's still possible it makes more money than Tirz in the US
Actually, if Novo drops their prices to a reasonable level, they deserve to take business from Lilly. I would gladly pay 200 dollars for a month of Semaglutide over the 1200 for Tirz. Someone has to lower the bar for the cost of GLP1.
In any case, I have a 5 year stockpile of Tirz and a -70 lab freezer to store it in while watching the system work itself out.
 
I've got a strong guess on
why only 57% went to max dose. The cagril side effects are no joke. Read up on the extreme fatigue most people experience on the smallest starting doses of cagril. It probably wasn't worth the extra few % of weight loss vs. not being able to get out of bed from exhaustion.
 
The analysis I saw was that this makes cagrisema a competitor to tirzepatide, not retatrutide. That would significantly change their position in the market over the next several years.
I don't disagree with your analysis. With that said, I follow the advice of Jack Bogle: Invest in an index fund and don't try to predict which stocks will do best. Also include some bonds in your fund so that it doesn't go down excessively in tough economic times.
 
Actually, if Novo drops their prices to a reasonable level, they deserve to take business from Lilly. I would gladly pay 200 dollars for a month of Semaglutide over the 1200 for Tirz. Someone has to lower the bar for the cost of GLP1.
In any case, I have a 5 year stockpile of Tirz and a -70 lab freezer to store it in while watching the system work itself out.
Why pay $200 per month for semaglutide? You could have bought semaglutide from Tracy a few days ago for $135 and had enough to last for a year and half if you take the full dose.
 
Why pay $200 per month for semaglutide? You could have bought semaglutide from Tracy a few days ago for $135 and had enough to last for a year and half if you take the full dose.
I think this person is suggesting the market would easily pay $200 a month. I agree. Most people aren't going to go the Tracy route. I actually think moat of the Tirzreddit soccer moms will gladly pay the $400 Monjauro copay program when compounding ends.
 
Why pay $200 per month for semaglutide? You could have bought semaglutide from Tracy a few days ago for $135 and had enough to last for a year and half if you take the full dose.
I was merely stating a price point where many people would actually go with a name brand supplier over compounders. My PCP offered to prescribe name brand GLP1 meds but we both agreed that the price point is unreasonable.
The unfortunate fact is that there is going to be a lot of pressure to shut down and discredit compounders by those who profit from the current high prices.
 
The unfortunate fact is that there is going to be a lot of pressure to shut down and discredit compounders by those who profit from the current high prices.
There already is. Unless something changes the FDA will attempt to shut down compounders (of Tirz) in the next 60-90 days and I think we can all agree that Sema is next.
 

Trending content

Latest posts

Forum statistics

Threads
1,942
Messages
31,809
Members
3,552
Latest member
Maizu
Back
Top