Tidalwave
Research Enthusiast
What's crazy is that the stupid medical establishment still considers 130 systolic as too high.
When I took paramedic training back in a previous century, the common standard for "normal" systolic BP was 100+a persons age and <100 diastolic. It was only considered high if systolic was more then 10% above the norm or if diastolic was >100. Then they lowered the hypertension threshold to 140 systolic, and when they couldn't get enough people paying for blood pressure meds they came up with this stage 1/stage 2 BS and lowered it again to 130.
You raise a really interesting point. It's true that the medical establishment has been slowly lowering the threshold for high blood pressure over the years, which has made more people eligible for blood pressure medication.
There's been a lot of controversy about this, with some people arguing that lowering the threshold too much can cause problems like over-diagnosis and overtreatment.
There's also been some discussion about whether the guidelines are based on the best evidence, or whether they're influenced by the financial interests of the pharmaceutical industry. What's your take on this?