I got qsc ghk-cu from the prior batch and they were some of the ugliest damn pucks I’ve ever seen, all shrunken and hollowed out, but they didn’t look wet per se. Testing came back good on em.
QSC using sales to dump subpar products
- Thread starter beefsteak
- Start date
Mysoph
New Member
FWIW, I received some. Same batch as reported on the most recent "regular" price list from US warehouse. They had a matte blue cap. I have no way of measuring moisture in them, but I was suspicious, so I sacrificed a vial to the peptide gods. I found there was definitely vacuum in the vial. I also noticed a difference in overall volume in this batch vs a different, more "dry" looking batch I received, delivered from China with white caps . This pale blue cap batch had a discernibly smaller total volume of product and much darker blue. I was able to crush the product and found it very *crunchy*. It is almost as if maybe it had less filler and crystallized during the freeze-drying process, giving a less powdery puck. It did feel about as dry as I would expect. Hard but brittle. It did not fragment easily into a powder, but instead more small crystals. It did reconstitute well, and being a true "research subject" i injected it without issue. Maybe not my safest act in life. But here I am more than a week later and my glow blend is working the way I expect it to still.
The blue cap also matches the description and picture in the Jano test report they linked from said price list: https://janoshik.com/tests/49064-GHK_or_GHKCu_75_mg_B35H94VPE53P. That deep blue color in the pic from Jano is the same as what I received.
I am not convinced it is "wet" per se, to be honest. But I cannot fault people for being cautious. The original poster sure looks to have a more "wet" look to theirs. But some of that can be light reflection off the poorly formed product.
Just my observations. Pic of both batches for reference. Anecdotal evidence is the worst evidence, but I feel we are in this a bit together as a community so I wanted to share.
geoguy78
Registered
Looking at this pic and others of "wet" product, I've been suspicious that it's not actually wet, but that a glazed crust formed. I'm not trying to defend QSC, but I think you might be on to something with your remark about crystallization.
It looks like some sort of crystallized structure to me. The average moron on the internet
Regardless of purity I’m not injecting something that color into my body
noteablequotable
Research Enthusiast
How dare you interrupt this useless cat fight with your perfectly normal question
The answer is both.
zpped
Research Enthusiast
Also, supposedly AHK-cu is supposed to have better hair growth. But I've not looked into it.How dare you interrupt this useless cat fight with your perfectly normal question
The answer is both.
noteablequotable
Research Enthusiast
I've heard this too, but no one is producing injection quality. It blocks the conversation of testosterone to DHT so it's good for all of the negative impacts of DHT.
This is also the MOA of Finasteride
I am doing both at the moment. I am almost finished with a month of GLOW. Verdict is still out...
I bought 5% topical from Costco. My hair has stopped falling out. Verdict is still out on regrowth as it has only been about the same timeframe.
I sell peptides, being wet, dry, crispy, round, ass shaped or idk what kind of BS you expect them to look like doesn't matter to me, and I don't give two flying fucks about how you expect them to look like.
The peptide is 99.9%, well dosed, end of the story.
You want them dry, get them elsewhere, as far as I know people prefer wet things than dry ones
If you used the two brain cells you have you won't be saying this.
If the peptide degrades, it won't reach janoshik with a 99.9% purity.
It won't be tested 99.9% by PTDS months later.
Proove your assumptions, or STFU
Another side question, but with the Christmas promo, I am still covered since I sent an order form on this past Thursday before promo was over but have not yet gotten a reply, correct?I sell peptides, being wet, dry, crispy, round, ass shaped or idk what kind of BS you expect them to look like doesn't matter to me, and I don't give two flying fucks about how you expect them to look like.
The peptide is 99.9%, well dosed, end of the story.
You want them dry, get them elsewhere, as far as I know people prefer wet things than dry ones
That's another stupid assumption, from a stupid guy again with a single digit IQ.
The peptide was tested for sterility, because some people thought the same thing, and guess what?
It pass the sterility tests done by PTDS, both TYMCC and TAMC.
Source or it didn't happen
You can tag someone who have access to PTDS testing links, I don't have the access to that server and not sure if it still exists.
Maybe @exploitedworkerbee
gershon
New_Member
I will say when a package was lost by USPS, Tracy and QSC team sent a replacement one. To this day we still cannot locate the original one! I can understand the frustration at times with response times, but so far they have been great!
noteablequotable
Research Enthusiast
