Reta Pricing Discrepancies: Quality or Market Exploitation

[DaddyBigRig]

There is a significant variation in Retatrutide pricing across vendors. Do you think the higher-priced Retatrutide is genuinely superior, or are some vendors simply capitalising on buyers who don’t conduct thorough due diligence? Some vendors are charging double the price. What justifies such a large pricing discrepancy?

 

[rkl123]

There is a significant variation in Retatrutide pricing across vendors. Do you think the higher-priced Retatrutide is genuinely superior, or are some vendors simply capitalising on buyers who don’t conduct thorough due diligence? Some vendors are charging double the price. What justifies such a large pricing discrepancy?

The latter. There's some single digit number of factories. Almost everyone is a reseller. Testing should only add in the ball park of 10-30% difference depending on how many tests and how big a buy. It's just folks making a quick buck off those that don't do research. There are a few GB's with consistently bad pricing that still do quite well for themselves as folks who haven't found other sources don't have an alternative.

 

[keangkong]

The latter. There's some single digit number of factories. Almost everyone is a reseller. Testing should only add in the ball park of 10-30% difference depending on how many tests and how big a buy. It's just folks making a quick buck off those that don't do research. There are a few GB's with consistently bad pricing that still do quite well for themselves as folks who haven't found other sources don't have an alternative.

I generally agree. With that said, if there is a vendor that you trust more than others, it may be worth paying 10, 20, or 30 percent more than from other vendors. However, don't assume the pricier vendor is more reliable.

 

[rkl123]

I generally agree. With that said, if there is a vendor that you trust more than others, it may be worth paying 10, 20, or 30 percent more than from other vendors. However, don't assume the pricier vendor is more reliable.

The bad GB I'm thinking of is more like 50-75% more per mg but I agree with your point most of the time

 

[scarywood75]

The latter. There's some single digit number of factories. Almost everyone is a reseller. Testing should only add in the ball park of 10-30% difference depending on how many tests and how big a buy. It's just folks making a quick buck off those that don't do research. There are a few GB's with consistently bad pricing that still do quite well for themselves as folks who haven't found other sources don't have an alternative.

While I also think there's a small number of raw factories, I think there's a lot more finishers tho.

The way it's finished is very important, but not for paying double the price I agree.

You also didn't include the customer service factor

 

[keangkong]

The bad GB I'm thinking of is more like 50-75% more per mg but I agree with your point most of the time

If you're thinking of Public Group Buys, I'd say spending more than a 30% premium for them may be worth the cost because the stuff is extensively tested.

 

[rkl123]

If you're thinking of Public Group Buys, I'd say spending more than a 30% premium for them may be worth the cost because the stuff is extensively tested.

I wasn't even considering them at this point. They're a special case. I bet money when they finally sell out of their GLP's, they'll get competitive again (i.e. too much inventory is their issue).