Secure America Act

trojanpeptide

trojanpeptide

GLP-1 Enthusiast
Member Since
Nov 9, 2025
Posts
163
Likes Received
394
Location
saskatoon, canada
Canada
On June 10th, President Trump signed the Secure America Act, allocating $69.5 billion to fully fund U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) and Customs and Border Protection (CBP) through September 30, 2029.

Indirect Impact on Peptide Imports​

The Act allocates $3.45 billion specifically for new nonintrusive inspection equipment, artificial intelligence, and machine learning technologies to combat the entry of illicit narcotics and improve screening at ports of entry. Since the FDA already classifies most non-pharmaceutical peptides as unapproved new drugs subject to detention (under Import Alert 66-78), this funding will likely lead to:

  • Higher Seizure Rates: Advanced AI-driven scanning will improve CBP's ability to identify and detain peptide shipments that previously might have slipped through.
  • Increased Scrutiny: The focus on "illicit narcotics" and "precursor chemicals" often encompasses unapproved pharmaceutical substances, including research peptides.

I think it's going to get harder to to get cheap peptides in the future.
 
trojanpeptide said:
On June 10th, President Trump signed the Secure America Act, allocating $69.5 billion to fully fund U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) and Customs and Border Protection (CBP) through September 30, 2029.

Indirect Impact on Peptide Imports​

The Act allocates $3.45 billion specifically for new nonintrusive inspection equipment, artificial intelligence, and machine learning technologies to combat the entry of illicit narcotics and improve screening at ports of entry. Since the FDA already classifies most non-pharmaceutical peptides as unapproved new drugs subject to detention (under Import Alert 66-78), this funding will likely lead to:

  • Higher Seizure Rates: Advanced AI-driven scanning will improve CBP's ability to identify and detain peptide shipments that previously might have slipped through.
  • Increased Scrutiny: The focus on "illicit narcotics" and "precursor chemicals" often encompasses unapproved pharmaceutical substances, including research peptides.

I think it's going to get harder to to get cheap peptides in the future.
Click to expand...
Bah its only for USA 🤡
 
spanky2026 said:
I'll believe it when I see it in action.
Click to expand...

latviantower said:
From the time the funds are allocated and approved to implementation of new-ish tech that results in actual seizures could be years.
Click to expand...

​

Broader Enforcement Trends​

This increase aligns with wider CBP statistics for Fiscal Year 2026. Through March 2026, CBP reported a 24% increase in total drug seizures compared to the same period in FY 2024. While this statistic covers all narcotics, the agency has explicitly linked improved detection rates to new nonintrusive inspection equipment and AI-driven targeting tools—technologies further funded by the Secure America Act to identify illicit pharmaceuticals and precursor chemicals more effectively.

iow, it is already happening, and we know this. Now they will purchase more scanners and such.
 
trojanpeptide said:
On June 10th, President Trump signed the Secure America Act, allocating $69.5 billion to fully fund U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) and Customs and Border Protection (CBP) through September 30, 2029.

Indirect Impact on Peptide Imports​

The Act allocates $3.45 billion specifically for new nonintrusive inspection equipment, artificial intelligence, and machine learning technologies to combat the entry of illicit narcotics and improve screening at ports of entry. Since the FDA already classifies most non-pharmaceutical peptides as unapproved new drugs subject to detention (under Import Alert 66-78), this funding will likely lead to:

  • Higher Seizure Rates: Advanced AI-driven scanning will improve CBP's ability to identify and detain peptide shipments that previously might have slipped through.
  • Increased Scrutiny: The focus on "illicit narcotics" and "precursor chemicals" often encompasses unapproved pharmaceutical substances, including research peptides.

I think it's going to get harder to to get cheap peptides in the future.
Click to expand...
Interesting, thanks for sharing.
 
They'll still be able to get it through smuggling routes from Canada. It'll be just like during Prohibition. Wait, when was that again, the '20s?
 
trojanpeptide said:
On June 10th, President Trump signed the Secure America Act, allocating $69.5 billion to fully fund U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) and Customs and Border Protection (CBP) through September 30, 2029.

Indirect Impact on Peptide Imports​

The Act allocates $3.45 billion specifically for new nonintrusive inspection equipment, artificial intelligence, and machine learning technologies to combat the entry of illicit narcotics and improve screening at ports of entry. Since the FDA already classifies most non-pharmaceutical peptides as unapproved new drugs subject to detention (under Import Alert 66-78), this funding will likely lead to:

  • Higher Seizure Rates: Advanced AI-driven scanning will improve CBP's ability to identify and detain peptide shipments that previously might have slipped through.
  • Increased Scrutiny: The focus on "illicit narcotics" and "precursor chemicals" often encompasses unapproved pharmaceutical substances, including research peptides.

I think it's going to get harder to to get cheap peptides in the future.
Click to expand...
200.gif
 
trojanpeptide said:

Indirect Impact on Peptide Imports​

The Act allocates $3.45 billion specifically for new nonintrusive inspection equipment, artificial intelligence, and machine learning technologies to combat the entry of illicit narcotics and improve screening at ports of entry.
Click to expand...
Now this man is trying to keep me from being a hottie with a killer figure and great skin. 🙄

latviantower said:
From the time the funds are allocated and approved to implementation of new-ish tech that results in actual seizures could be years. The government contracting process guarantees that.
Click to expand...
True LOL. I’ve worked for a government org before and it took months just to get a desk removed from the office.
 
Last edited:
spanky2026 said:
Lol, you have a lot more faith than I do in the ability of the government or contractors to actually implement things. I'll believe it when I see it in action.
Click to expand...
Right . . . didn't this and previous admins say they were gonna stop fentanyl imports, too?

Ironically, some of the fentanyl facilities have now been repurposed for peptides. Fentanyl use and deaths have both been down significantly in the US the past 1-1/2 years. That appears to be driven by the demand side, not by govt intervention.
 
AngieHolmes said:
Right . . . didn't this and previous admins say they were gonna stop fentanyl imports, too?

Ironically, some of the fentanyl facilities have now been repurposed for peptides. Fentanyl use and deaths have both been down significantly in the US the past 1-1/2 years. That appears to be driven by the demand side, not by govt intervention.
Click to expand...
I have seen many boats unexpectantly exploding in the last year and a half. So I suppose that had nothing to do with it? Lol
 
CNCCurrency said:
I have seen many boats unexpectantly exploding in the last year and a half. So I suppose that had nothing to do with it? Lol
Click to expand...

According to the evidence collected by the US, ". . . many of these vessels are destroyed in U.S. military strikes before physical cargo can be seized and cataloged." We have no idea what's on the boats, nor can we know whether smuggling is their objective. When we have seen evidence of drugs (floating in the ocean nearby), authorities are mostly identifying kilos of coke. Not in amounts that would appreciably alter the supply of that drug, much less fentanyl.

So no, there's no known correlation between blowing up boats near Venezuela and a reduction in fentanyl use / overdose in the US. Any reduction in supply is centered on China, not South America, and it's looking like it may be more of a demand issue than a supply one anyway.
 
AngieHolmes said:
According to the evidence collected by the US, ". . . many of these vessels are destroyed in U.S. military strikes before physical cargo can be seized and cataloged." We have no idea what's on the boats, nor can we know whether smuggling is their objective. When we have seen evidence of drugs (floating in the ocean nearby), authorities are mostly identifying kilos of coke. Not in amounts that would appreciably alter the supply of that drug, much less fentanyl.

So no, there's no known correlation between blowing up boats near Venezuela and a reduction in fentanyl use / overdose in the US. Any reduction in supply is centered on China, not South America, and it's looking like it may be more of a demand issue than a supply one anyway.
Click to expand...
College Im Clever GIF
 
AngieHolmes said:
According to the evidence collected by the US, ". . . many of these vessels are destroyed in U.S. military strikes before physical cargo can be seized and cataloged." We have no idea what's on the boats, nor can we know whether smuggling is their objective. When we have seen evidence of drugs (floating in the ocean nearby), authorities are mostly identifying kilos of coke. Not in amounts that would appreciably alter the supply of that drug, much less fentanyl.

So no, there's no known correlation between blowing up boats near Venezuela and a reduction in fentanyl use / overdose in the US. Any reduction in supply is centered on China, not South America, and it's looking like it may be more of a demand issue than a supply one anyway.
Click to expand...

AngieHolmes said:
According to the evidence collected by the US, ". . . many of these vessels are destroyed in U.S. military strikes before physical cargo can be seized and cataloged." We have no idea what's on the boats, nor can we know whether smuggling is their objective. When we have seen evidence of drugs (floating in the ocean nearby), authorities are mostly identifying kilos of coke. Not in amounts that would appreciably alter the supply of that drug, much less fentanyl.

So no, there's no known correlation between blowing up boats near Venezuela and a reduction in fentanyl use / overdose in the US. Any reduction in supply is centered on China, not South America, and it's looking like it may be more of a demand issue than a supply one anyway.
Click to expand...
According to you, which means squat!!!
 
Price on GLP1s is still coming down, so not worried about enforcement. We know that the Chinese wouldn't lower prices if they were not making at least 10x. More importantly, I've got more than 5g of my favorite GLP1 stocked.
 
Habibibi said:
Price on GLP1s is still coming down, so not worried about enforcement. We know that the Chinese wouldn't lower prices if they were not making at least 10x. More importantly, I've got more than 5g of my favorite GLP1 stocked.
Click to expand...
Ditto!
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Trending Topics

Latest Posts

Forum Statistics

Threads
17,865
Posts
185,798
Members
59,930
Newest
dogfostermom
Back
Top Bottom