SLU-PP-915??? Any opinions?

Smiter

Smiter

Member Since
Apr 16, 2026
Posts
1,148
Likes Received
3,049
Location
Virginia, USA
I am really stoked about one day trying SLU-915. I haven't heard anything about it here. Has anyone tried it? Or have you guys heard any news regarding it? Due to the immense love I have for cardio and aerobic exercise, I have looked fondly upon exercise mimetics. Please don't hesitate to give your honest take on the 915.
 
I've done some surface level research into it but you still probably know more than I do about it still.
 
Pocket said:
but you still probably know more than I do about it still
Click to expand...
I wish... In the dark alleyways I frequent, this compound has interested many of my fellow travelers. We're of the same general mindset when it comes to prioritizing ease and comfort. If even an iota of hardship can be avoided, I am all for it. Prioritizing where we spend our mental and physical energy is non-negotiable for me.
 
All the studies out in 2026 so far are most promising. MA research is consistently out of stock and some shady looking supplier on Reddit notwithstanding, everyone else is charging such a killer price that one would think a buyer is purchasing Genghiz Khan and his hordes for killability.
 
Pocket said:
Right? I am interested in it too, but like Smiter said, its expensive and/or sold out everywhere I look.
Click to expand...
I’m going to keep an eye out for it. Really curious to see first hand experiences with it.
 
I sent some emails to one manufacturer whose CoA for it was sweeeeet.. Maybe if we can create a substantial group interest we could get a maker to produce it....but do note, there is the problem of solubility which means we got to figure out the best mode of transmission. I checked a couple of animal studies' reports and the results were great, which is why the silence is surprising.
 
I am going to have to throw on my research hat here, and look more into it. I am still a newb when it comes to anything outside of BAC water solutions.
 
Smiter said:
I sent some emails to one manufacturer whose CoA for it was sweeeeet.. Maybe if we can create a substantial group interest we could get a maker to produce it....but do note, there is the problem of solubility which means we got to figure out the best mode of transmission. I checked a couple of animal studies' reports and the results were great, which is why the silence is surprising.
Click to expand...
My interest is peaked. Let me know what you find and I will do that same.
 
My understanding when I first read about it was they were specifically developing it to have oral bioavailability. That piqued my interest because I would like to try the exercise mimetic but didn’t want to deal with all the stuff I understand it takes to reconstitute and inject 332. This was awhile back tho and I didn’t even realize they’d finished developing it let alone that it was available to us in grey market lol
 
MA research boys had a liquid suspension version which they have listed as out of stock. I wonder if an intranasal would work like the sublingual version. It's called intranasal but like the Salbutamol inhaler, it's used orally.
 
SLU-PP-332 doesn't get talked about enough. It's an ERR agonist so it basically mimics what happens to your body during endurance training at the cellular level. The mitochondrial biogenesis research on it is pretty wild. Animal studies showed solid improvements in oxidative capacity and stamina in sedentary subjects which is what got me interested in it. It's still early compared to something like cardarine but honestly I think the mechanism is cleaner. Hitting ERR directly vs PPAR delta just feels more targeted. Going to be interesting to watch as more data comes out.
 
Rawbiotix said:
SLU-PP-332 doesn't get talked about enough. It's an ERR agonist so it basically mimics what happens to your body during endurance training at the cellular level. The mitochondrial biogenesis research on it is pretty wild. Animal studies showed solid improvements in oxidative capacity and stamina in sedentary subjects which is what got me interested in it. It's still early compared to something like cardarine but honestly I think the mechanism is cleaner. Hitting ERR directly vs PPAR delta just feels more targeted. Going to be interesting to watch as more data comes out.
Click to expand...
The confusing dosage arguements and whats effective are whats keeping me from even thinking about it. Saw a mg per kg? Unless someone designed a belt fed pen that seems like a pain. Lol
 
The dosing question is the biggest thing holding people back from taking it seriously. Most of the animal data used mg per kg so extrapolating to human equivalent doses gets murky fast. The general range people have been working with is somewhere between 10mg and 50mg but there is no clean consensus yet. That is honestly part of what makes it interesting though. The research is still early enough that people who get in now and actually track their results are going to be the ones shaping the conversation when more data comes out. The pen issue is real too. Until someone figures out a cleaner delivery format the barrier to entry stays high which is probably why it hasn't blown up the way cardarine did.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Trending Topics

Latest Posts

Forum Statistics

Threads
18,312
Posts
191,211
Members
61,302
Newest
wes5500
Back
Top Bottom