MassDebater
Recently Joined
I know this question has been asked rather indirectly as I have found during researching answers for this question, but I wanted to post this to ask it more directly, debating the pros and cons of each to determine which is better. As I understand it, Tesa and CJC (no-dac) activate the same GHRH pathway, and yet both are attributed for different results/effects (Tesa for viseral fat reduction and a generally more strong/pronounced release of GH, CJC for sleep benefits alongside overall "health" improvements). It feels weird regarding the different effects attributed to either despite activating the same pathway, but I digress.
For me, not at all really concerned about fat reduction, just interested in increasing gh (and indirectly increased igf1) levels with as little side effects as can be had. For that particular use case, which one would be preferred?
For me, not at all really concerned about fat reduction, just interested in increasing gh (and indirectly increased igf1) levels with as little side effects as can be had. For that particular use case, which one would be preferred?