Testing Vendor or Vendor + 3rd party?

[Lifeworthliving]

I have 6 mg of Reta reconstituted. I have the COA from a particular purple-boxed vendor. They have their Janoshik test report, which is all good. The group 3rd party testing is still pending.

Where does people's comfort level lie with this? If Janshik COA in hand, do folks proceed? Or do most wait for the third-party testing results as well?

 

[ZippityDooDah]

Vendor-supplied test reports (calling them a "COA" is pretty meaningless since that only "certifies" that the vial(s) tested at that time had X results, nothing more; people seem to like the COA term because it sounds official and impressive) are only good for one thing: holding vendors to account for providing the product advertised when subsequent truly independent tests are performed.

A reputable vendor will stand behind their test results by guaranteeing that any independent tests showing lower mass/purity results outside an acceptable margin of error percentage will result in refund or replacement.

So no, making purchasing decisions based solely or primarily on vendor-provided test results should not bring anyone comfort.

 

[Airborne Daddy]

I have 6 mg of Reta reconstituted. I have the COA from a particular purple-boxed vendor. They have their Janoshik test report, which is all good. The group 3rd party testing is still pending.

Where does people's comfort level lie with this? If Janshik COA in hand, do folks proceed? Or do most wait for the third-party testing results as well?

Just pin ur nexaph ur good.