Why Not CJC-1295 DAC

[wildweasel]

CJC no DAC users, why do you choose it over CJC-DAC?

CJC no DAC seems to be preferred by almost everyone in the peptide community over CJC-DAC and I’ve always found this curious given CJC-DAC has so much medical literature showing significant increases to average gh increases by 200%-1000% and igf-1 increases by 150%-300% above baseline… and only requires weekly dosing instead of 2-3 times daily…. You don’t event need to pair it with a ghrp like ipamorelin to get its effects.

Just wondering your thoughts and why you chose what you did

 

[Smiter]

CJC-DAC has so much medical literature showing significant increases to average gh increases by 200%-1000% and igf-1 increases by 150%-300% above baseline… and only requires weekly dosing instead of 2-3 times daily

You answered your question. Thats why folks dont take it. Normally, in our bodies, GH works in intermittent pulse release. Consistent and permanent release of GH is at best artificial, and at worst, excessive. So, with a secretagogue constantly pushing the pituitary gland to produce somatotropin, there is a chance for excess GH. I think that's why it is not recommended unless folks have a severely low GH or IGF production.

 

[cloratheshadow]

Because the half life is much longer so if you have any adverse reactions you are stuck with them. I think it’s like 8 days?