Research and Clinical Studies Thread

[Memo85]

I haven’t found a thread in whichs links are provided for individual peps . Maybe we can start in this thread and post links to research and clinical studies on all peptides. It would be easier for us to read and gain some knowledge.

 

[lessthanhalf]

The problem is that the truly reliable information is in scientific papers, almost every place online that bundles the information up either in text or even worse in video format is essentially not trustable, nearly all are trying to sell something. And nearly always anything not in a scientific paper, and sometimes even in them, the claims of effectiveness are overstated, clear distinctions about what is known from cell or animal studies, versus actual human testing is usually not done, which is absolutely misleading . There is a whole world of difference between a few interesting or promising animal studies and real human clinical trials, and often even when human studies have been done they are small and have not been replicated, or have been done by small insular groups like the russian bioregulators, and again not replicated elsewhere. And a single small human study is some evidence at least, but a long way from the type of proof of safety and effectiveness required for the usual process of regulatory drug approval.
Google scholar?
AI in research/scholar mode?, And ask it to provide evidence. It will still hallucinate sometimes, but I have seen some stuff produced by AI posted on this forum that is a long way from scientifically valid, and at least this way it is less likely to regurgitate stuff from a site selling peptides.

 

[Memo85]

Reta :

The problem is that the truly reliable information is in scientific papers, almost every place online that bundles the information up either in text or even worse in video format is essentially not trustable, nearly all are trying to sell something. And nearly always anything not in a scientific paper, and sometimes even in them, the claims of effectiveness are overstated, clear distinctions about what is known from cell or animal studies, versus actual human testing is usually not done, which is absolutely misleading . There is a whole world of difference between a few interesting or promising animal studies and real human clinical trials, and often even when human studies have been done they are small and have not been replicated, or have been done by small insular groups like the russian bioregulators, and again not replicated elsewhere. And a single small human study is some evidence at least, but a long way from the type of proof of safety and effectiveness required for the usual process of regulatory drug approval.
Google scholar?
AI in research/scholar mode?, And ask it to provide evidence. It will still hallucinate sometimes, but I have seen some stuff produced by AI posted on this forum that is a long way from scientifically valid, and at least this way it is less likely to regurgitate stuff from a site selling peptide

The problem is that the truly reliable information is in scientific papers, almost every place online that bundles the information up either in text or even worse in video format is essentially not trustable, nearly all are trying to sell something. And nearly always anything not in a scientific paper, and sometimes even in them, the claims of effectiveness are overstated, clear distinctions about what is known from cell or animal studies, versus actual human testing is usually not done, which is absolutely misleading . There is a whole world of difference between a few interesting or promising animal studies and real human clinical trials, and often even when human studies have been done they are small and have not been replicated, or have been done by small insular groups like the russian bioregulators, and again not replicated elsewhere. And a single small human study is some evidence at least, but a long way from the type of proof of safety and effectiveness required for the usual process of regulatory drug approval.
Google scholar?
AI in research/scholar mode?, And ask it to provide evidence. It will still hallucinate sometimes, but I have seen some stuff produced by AI posted on this forum that is a long way from scientifically valid, and at least this way it is less likely to regurgitate stuff from a site selling peptides.

just like anything. It would be up to the reader to review sources etc. I guess we could get multiple sources and see where the “studies “ differ or relate. I appreciate your time. Thanks