New Reta Triumph 1 Results

This is a national security issue.

The US DoD needs to make sure gen Z has this stuff so they're fit for service.

The CCP is selling us the drugs that will improve the draft pool of their adversary.

For some reason the US is ok with keeping their kids fat, and the Chinese are ok with making them fit.

This confuses the patriot.
 

Thanks for posting. It's really amazing that the placebo group lost 17% (19.2% - 2.2% at week 80) of their body weight from week 80 to 104 (just 24 weeks). The 4mg group only lost 19% over 80 weeks (that's over a year more than the placebo group). Clearly the placebo group titrated up quickly and lost weight quickly and matched the total weight loss of the 4mg over 2 years. That's freaking amazing.
 
Another HUGE takeaway from the phase 3 top line results is that even starting at week 80, that titrating up can produce additional weight loss up to week 104 (2 years) Freaking YEAH! The effect was more so for the 4mg folks rather than the 9mg folks as we would expect. But even for the 9mg folks, titrating up at week 80 to week 104 produced almost an additional 3.4% of loss.

25MG of Tirzepatide, here I come, clear the way 😂. I’d gladly take 3.4% more weight loss right about now….
 
Last edited:
This is a national security issue.

The US DoD needs to make sure gen Z has this stuff so they're fit for service.

The CCP is selling us the drugs that will improve the draft pool of their adversary.

For some reason the US is ok with keeping their kids fat, and the Chinese are ok with making them fit.

This confuses the patriot.
More for them to kill/
I’d gladly take 3.4% more weight loss right about now
🙄 🙄 🙄 though, the placebo details seem very sketchy to me.
 
More for them to kill/

🙄 🙄 🙄 though, the placebo details seem very sketchy to me.

Yes, the 17% in 24 weeks seems pretty dramatic. But by week 80, those people were so desperate to lose weight that they went on a hunger strike 😂.
 
You realize the placebo group got put on Reta and that caused them to lose weight, right?
That's why it seemed sketchy to me, meaning the study methodology. How can you call them a placebo group when they were given the real deal? Second, some indicate they were given the drug later on and then they got huge weight loss...All of that seemed off to me.
 
That's why it seemed sketchy to me, meaning the study methodology. How can you call them a placebo group when they were given the real deal? Second, some indicate they were given the drug later on and then they got huge weight loss...All of that seemed off to me.
The placebo group is the control group… everyone is in the control group until the test variable is introduced…. For the ones that started getting Reta at 80 weeks, they were in the control group before that. Picture it as consecutive trials with the control groups running concurrently for the placebo and lower dose escalation trials.
 
For the ones that started getting Reta at 80 weeks, they were in the control group before that. Picture it as consecutive trials with the control groups running concurrently for the placebo and lower dose escalation trials
Right, that's how I saw it, too. IMO, that methodology seems flawed to me because the moment we give the real drug to a group, how can they be called placebo group after that? Also, doesn't that defeat the whole purpose of a placebo group in the first place? IMO, if we want to test the efficacy of a drug over long-slow-titration, quick-dose-escalation, and a real placebo group, shouldn't we keep a third group who never gets the drug? Do you get my assertion?
 
I find it interesting that at least one member of the placebo group lost 35% of their body weight with no drug whatsoever. Clearly, there were some lifestyle changes involved.
 
The real question is why did the participants remain in the trial after it became obvious they were in the placebo group? Apparently the monetary incentive was adequate to keep them ethical.

I told my brother about the Reta trials enrolling and he immediately looked into it. Fortunately, he didn't qualify since he previously was on tirz. He's the kind of participant nobody wants in their trial. He is familiar with GLP-1 effects and told me he would drop out in the first week if he didn't feel any effects.🤷
 
The real question is why did the participants remain in the trial after it became obvious they were in the placebo group? Apparently the monetary incentive was adequate to keep them ethical.

I told my brother about the Reta trials enrolling and he immediately looked into it. Fortunately, he didn't qualify since he previously was on tirz. He's the kind of participant nobody wants in their trial. He is familiar with GLP-1 effects and told me he would drop out in the first week if he didn't feel any effects.🤷
Better yet how did placebo group at 104 weeks post numbers not too far off from the 4mg reta group....
 
Better yet how did placebo group at 104 weeks post numbers not too far off from the 4mg reta group....

Yeah, that's hard to believe because the 4mg was on reta for 80 weeks and the placebo on nothing for those 80 weeks and then both groups titrated up to the maximum tolerated dose. That doesn't speak well for staying on lose doses for long periods of time.
 
The real question is why did the participants remain in the trial after it became obvious they were in the placebo group? Apparently the monetary incentive was adequate to keep them ethical.

I told my brother about the Reta trials enrolling and he immediately looked into it. Fortunately, he didn't qualify since he previously was on tirz. He's the kind of participant nobody wants in their trial. He is familiar with GLP-1 effects and told me he would drop out in the first week if he didn't feel any effects.🤷
You get paid to participate in a medical trial whether you are on the real deal or a placebo. When I did medical trial, it was $1000/wk for the 8 weeks. (Not a weight loss trial)
 
The side effects profile was much more pronounced in higher dosages. If anything, these results just reaffirmed my choice to stick with Tirzepatide, as my personal results have exceeded the Reta trial results without any of the side effects. Down 35.4% total weight in 52 weeks.
 
The side effects profile was much more pronounced in higher dosages. If anything, these results just reaffirmed my choice to stick with Tirzepatide, as my personal results have exceeded the Reta trial results without any of the side effects. Down 35.4% total weight in 52 weeks.
Sometimes I wonder how different my opinion would be if I had tried tirz instead of reta when I first got into this.

But I tried reta. So it's the best one. And your opinion is wrong.
 
That's why it seemed sketchy to me, meaning the study methodology. How can you call them a placebo group when they were given the real deal? Second, some indicate they were given the drug later on and then they got huge weight loss...All of that seemed off to me.
It was an extension, not part of the main trial. The main trial ended with the placebo group still injecting sterile water. Only after that did they get switched.
 

Trending Topics

Forum Statistics

Threads
17,674
Posts
183,308
Members
59,379
Newest
mrmocha83
Back
Top Bottom