I don't know if I'd want something more effective, honestly. I lost over half my body weight using semaglutide and have been sitting comfortably at a BMI of 19 pretty much since then. That's part of my (perhaps unfounded) worry about having to switch to tirzepatide or something different, I can't reasonably afford to lose more weight at this point. But I also know from decades of experience that if I stop taking these drugs I'll gain all the weight back very quickly.
I've never had a prescription since my insurance won't cover GLP medication for obesity alone, so I've only ever used resellers/grey. Can I ask, on tirzepatide alone, was the appetite suppression sufficient for you? That's particularly what I'm worried about if I have to switch. Sema has been so effective for me at such a low dose, but I'm worried something else might not be. I know the suppression from it is stronger since it only acts on the GLP1 pathway, which is why the doses for it are so much lower -- and also why a lot of people have worse side effects. My girlfriend for example, switched to tirze after being unable to handle the side effects of semaglutide.
Also I'll be honest, I struggle a lot with my mental health in general, so it's entirely possible I actually am having side effects from the sema but just not noticing it. I have depression/anxiety/panic disorder already so unless something was really fucking me up I probably wouldn't even register it. That's part of what happened with my girlfriend, along with the gastro effects.
It sounds like you are a super responder to semaglutide, so I actually would not worry too much about having to switch, It is not like it has been formally researched, but it would be very likely if you responded that well to sema you would respond equally well to tirz or reta.
A lot is said online about how good each drug is at appetite suppression, but a lot just does not really make sense. There is really no evidence that tirz increases energy expenditure, it is possible all GLP drugs reduce the decline in EE with weight loss, but not exactly proven yet. So if tirz does not increase EE, then to cause more weight loss, it is causing people to eat less, so by any reasonable definition, it causes more appetite suppression, which is why it causes more weight loss than sema.
Sema is more potent at GLP-1 receptors than tirz on a mg to mg basis, but at maximum doses of tirz or sema, total downstream effects of GLP activation are likely higher for tirz than sema, mainly due to the biased agonism of tirz on GLP-1, where it preferentially activates cAMP signalling over beta arrestin signalling, which reduces receptor removal from the cell membrane so it can no longer interact with GLP-1. In effect this means tirz can have a stronger effect on GLP-1 than sema, once adjusted for doses.
It is the GIP agonism of tirz that counteracts nausea, malaise and food aversion from GLP-1 agonism, which explains it's lower rates of side effects.
I started using GLP drugs backwards, in that I lost most of the weight first. I knew GLP's existed , having looked at the research on and off for the last 40 years hoping one day they will finally make something that works, and then they did, but I could not afford it , which sucked , not being employed, so I lost the weight and had a year of trying sucessfully to keep it off before starting ozempic, but it was hard and I was more or less always hungry. Ozempic at 0.8mg/w helped a bit with the hunger and a bit with making me fuller from smaller amounts of food. Tirz was a bit better, mainly as it caused less side effects so I could increase the dose, and by then I found out about cheap chinese versions so cost was no longer the problem. But I was still hungry on 15mg of tirz, which is why I added in the reta and later cagri. If I had to do it on just tirz, it would be much easier than without it, but I still hope it might be possible to use these drugs to find a stable point where appetite is reduced to match the number of calories needed to stay weight neutral long term, about 1600-1800 kcal/day.
I do know what you mean about not knowing what effects in has on the brain. I have had recurrent/treatment resistant depression for a long time, and there is no way to know if it makes anhedonia / amotivational issues worse or not, as these symptoms and the drugs change over long periods of time making changes slow and hard to easily see. I figure in the end the mental effects of regaining 80kg would be worse than anything the drugs could possibly do.