GLP-1 Forum

Trump threatens new 100% tariff on Chinese imports starting Nov. 1 or sooner

fatbegone

GLP-1 Novice
Member Since
Apr 17, 2025
Posts
23
Likes Received
46
From
Narnia
"Trump said that 'starting November 1st, 2025 (or sooner, depending on any further actions or changes taken by China), the United States of America will impose a Tariff of 100% on China, over and above any Tariff that they are currently paying.'”

 
"Trump said that 'starting November 1st, 2025 (or sooner, depending on any further actions or changes taken by China), the United States of America will impose a Tariff of 100% on China, over and above any Tariff that they are currently paying.'”

Doing his best to bankrupt America just like his casino.
 
The irony with tariffs is that the customer (you and me) pay the tariff and not CN seller.
It's retaliatory cuz they don't wanna share their rare metals/elements that we need for everything. I voted for him but he's making peptides impossible and killing my 401k. They better make a deal...
 
"Trump said that 'starting November 1st, 2025 (or sooner, depending on any further actions or changes taken by China), the United States of America will impose a Tariff of 100% on China, over and above any Tariff that they are currently paying.'”

Does India make peptides?
 
It's retaliatory cuz they don't wanna share their rare metals/elements that we need for everything. I voted for him but he's making peptides impossible and killing my 401k. They better make a deal...
That’s not quite how it works. The U.S. imports many rare earth elements from countries like China because we lack large-scale domestic production. A 100% tariff would be a U.S. action—essentially a tax on imports—which would raise costs for products that use those materials (like electronics, EVs, and manufacturing equipment).

Other countries could retaliate, but the tariff itself isn’t because they don’t want to share—it’s the U.S. trying to pressure or protect certain industries
 
That’s not quite how it works. The U.S. imports many rare earth elements from countries like China because we lack large-scale domestic production. A 100% tariff would be a U.S. action—essentially a tax on imports—which would raise costs for products that use those materials (like electronics, EVs, and manufacturing equipment).

Other countries could retaliate, but the tariff itself isn’t because they don’t want to share—it’s the U.S. trying to pressure or protect certain industries
What I read was china was gonna make us use permits, with restrictions and requirements and Trump said I guess there's no sense even meeting next month and then said I'll slap another 100% on the 30%.... seems like a reaction to china's action but I'm not a political science major.
 
It's retaliatory cuz they don't wanna share their rare metals/elements that we need for everything. I voted for him but he's making peptides impossible and killing my 401k. They better make a deal...
I voted for him too, but I’m more upset about his bitch move to allow Qatar to put an Airbase in Idaho as part of the peace deal with Israel and Palestine. He lost me with that shit. That’s pandering at its best. I say accelerate letting them destroy the each other.
 
Last edited:
What I read was china was gonna make us use permits, with restrictions and requirements and Trump said I guess there's no sense even meeting next month and then said I'll slap another 100% on the 30%.... seems like a reaction to china's action but I'm not a political science major.
Yeah, you’ve got the basic idea right — China did announce new export restrictions on certain rare earth materials and minerals, which are essential for tech, batteries, and manufacturing. The new rules would mean U.S. companies have to apply for permits and meet extra conditions to import them.

Trump’s response about “no sense meeting next month” and threatening another 100% tariff is definitely a reaction to that. So you’re right — it’s back-and-forth pressure.

The tricky part is that tariffs like that don’t just hit China — they raise costs for U.S. manufacturers who rely on those materials, which can ripple into higher prices and market drops. That’s probably what’s showing up in your 401k.

So yeah, it’s a real standoff — both sides using leverage, but in the meantime, it creates a lot of uncertainty for investors and consumers.
 

Trending Topics

Latest Posts

Forum Statistics

Threads
5,974
Posts
76,471
Members
17,339
Newest
gainlocked541
Top Bottom