Anyone still using HK peptides

[yritchey]

I recently got their results from finnrick and some peptides I use scored low. Anyone notice a decline in quality or had issues recently

 

[lemon lady]

I still use them, the communication and response time is good, besides the other big players have had too many issues lately and 2 are ghosting customers.
They reported bad because they overfill, not because the peptide is low quality or non-existant in the sample, i'm fine with that.

 

[yritchey]

Thank you for your help!

 

[Rockybalboa]

I recently got their results from finnrick and some peptides I use scored low. Anyone notice a decline in quality or had issues recently

They have done Janoshik tests recently with perfect dosing and purity

 

[ZippityDooDah]

Anyone trusting Finnrickles "test" results should probably just stick to name brand big pharma products.

 

[yritchey]

They have done Janoshik tests recently with perfect dosing and purity

Ive requested these. Thanks

 

[yritchey]

Anyone trusting Finnrickles "test" results should probably just stick to name brand big pharma products.

Im trying to learn about finnrick, is there a reason you say this?

 

[BooneDonk]

Im trying to learn about finnrick, is there a reason you say this?

There has to be a reason they are giving this service away. No such thing as a free puppy. Too much money in machines, labor, and all the rest to just be a service to the community. That's my thoughts on it. It is backed by lots of $$$$$$

 

[nogainz]

There has to be a reason they are giving this service away. No such thing as a free puppy. Too much money in machines, labor, and all the rest to just be a service to the community. That's my thoughts on it. It is backed by lots of $$$$$$

Yes they are a startup, backed by Naval Ravikant of AngelList. Let's say they pay an average of $100 per test (it's likely less) because of course the labs are not theirs, so they have no overhead for the equipment or the labs themselves. The number of tests they've run (2663 so far) have cost them a quarter million to date. Startup seed money is often in the 7 figures. The run rate of the business while they develop a business plan will keep them up and running easily through next year and beyond.

None of the conspiracies check out. I've seen speculation that they are the feds, they work for big pharma, and everything inbetween. The DEA, if they are only bad at their job, is on this forum and all of the others, monitoring the entire grey market for both peptides and AAS. They already know all of the CN suppliers, and they have ordered from them and know exactly how the process works. To say something like Finnrick is a grand conspiracy to inform them or big pharma is the product of a little too much Netflix consumption and tin foil hattery. It's a startup that sees an untapped market. Whether they choose a subscription model (for the labs, us or both), or decide to accept advertising (as bad a decision as that would be), it still makes the most sense that they're accumulating data for now, like any startup would, to monetize it however they choose down the road.

 

[forkknife]

I still use them, the communication and response time is good, besides the other big players have had too many issues lately and 2 are ghosting customers.
They reported bad because they overfill, not because the peptide is low quality or non-existant in the sample, i'm fine with that.

This HK Peptides? https://glp1forum.com/threads/【hk-pep】💜henan-kuisu-technology-co-lt💜.5279/

 

[Ellie2603]

Ich habe bereits mehrmals bei HK-Peptide bestellt und bin sowohl mit der Kommunikation als auch mit der Wirksamkeit der Peptide sehr zufrieden!

 

[nogainz]

This HK Peptides? https://glp1forum.com/threads/【hk-pep】💜henan-kuisu-technology-co-lt💜.5279/

No. At least when I ordered a couple months back it was from "Hailey" - not sure if posting her WhatsApp violates forum policy so DM me for it.

(all of these WhatsApp contacts show AI-generated aisian women but are likely some chain-smoking dude in a closet wearing a wife-beater surrounded by peptide vials).

 

[ZippityDooDah]

None of the conspiracies check out.

None of the benevolent do-gooder theories check out.

I don't think they're feds, or big pharma plants, or anything of the sort. They have a motive - undoubtedly a profit motive - that they are going to great lengths to be completely opaque about by attempting to disguise it as some grand higher calling to make the world a better place for peptide users.

If they can't be transparent and honest about what they're doing and why, there is zero reason to trust or promote anything that they proffer. People sharing their "data" or suggesting that they're a trustworthy means for having peptides tested are allowing themselves to be just another "product" to be used for someone else's profit.

I'm more inclined to believe that this is a collaboration of various peptide vendors (the mystical "cabal" some of the whackos like to prattle on about...) working to manipulate as much of the research peptide industry as possible to their own advantage. Does this make more or less sense than some affluent investors deciding that it's worth their time and substantial financial investment to protect the peptide enthusiast public?