Amopure 60mg TFA Test Results

DevynL90

Member
Joined
Oct 6, 2024
Messages
157
Reaction score
424
Location
PDX
ARF9T73MOXGJ0BVPYLZ8.png
 
What was the time frame for your purchase? Were the pucks the broken up ‘fluffy’ variety?
 
Ordered on 10/6, received 10/11. a few fluffy/broken pucks but mostly solid/intact.
 
Any experience with them yet?
nope, still working through my last remaining compound sadly. i also dunno if ill start with them as i have some other T30's from other vendors that i think I might go through first.
 
Hello. I am new here. Please don’t yell at me. I just got banned off Reddit for talking about gray.

I too have fluffy pucks from around that same time and the same vendor. I have been wondering these last weeks why fluffy is less preferable than solid. Can someone clue me in.

Yes, I have googled it.
 
Hello. I am new here. Please don’t yell at me. I just got banned off Reddit for talking about gray.

I too have fluffy pucks from around that same time and the same vendor. I have been wondering these last weeks why fluffy is less preferable than solid. Can someone clue me in.

Yes, I have googled it.
As far as I can tell its mostly because Amo is the outlier here vs other manufacturers - so pretty much just expectation based on previous purchases. There have been a few posts saying that Janoshik the testing lab has claimed that Amos samples are different than any others tested in this way, which seems to confirm that they do things a little differently than others. There are some folks who have experienced "gelling" when reconstituting Amo vials, which may or may not be related to the pucks consistency. Finally the higher than average amount of folks who complain about Amo giving them a stinging or burning pain on injection further heightens the concern - its a confluence of oddities that I think just weirds folks out.
 
Last edited:
As far as I can tell its mostly because Amo is the outlier here vs other manufacturers - so pretty much just expectation based on previous purchases. There have been a few posts saying that Janoshik the testing lab has claimed that Amos samples are different than any others tested in this way, which seems to confirm that they do things a little differently than others. There are some folks who have experienced "gelling" when reconstituting Amo vials, which may or may not be related to the pucks consistency. Finally the higher than average amount of folks who complain about Amo giving them a stinging or burning pain on injection further heightens the concern - its a confluence of oddities that I think just weirds folks out.
Yet we have the product and I'd bet the majority are using it cuz it works and we paid for it. Small price to pay to fit in my skinny jeans!

I am using it despite 🐝 with "L", no sting with their Cagri fwiw
 
Well, I have zero worries about sting. I use the Anela protocol with GHK-Cu. Now THAT is a stinger!

However, I am a bit more concerned with jelling . . . Are we talking an interesting viscosity . . . Or are we talking too thick for the syringe?
 
Yet we have the product and I'd bet the majority are using it cuz it works and we paid for it. Small price to pay to fit in my skinny jeans!

I am using it despite 🐝 with "L", no sting with their Cagri fwiw
Cant lie my first kit was from Amo, no complaints. Im finding other vendors to be far more economical for variety and long term buying though.

Well, I have zero worries about sting. I use the Anela protocol with GHK-Cu. Now THAT is a stinger!

However, I am a bit more concerned with jelling . . . Are we talking an interesting viscosity . . . Or are we talking too thick for the syringe?
If you search around in the amo threads theres at least one user reporting that their vial gelled up to a concerning amount after reconstituting. They discarded it. Stinging I could put up with (within reason), gelling I wouldnt risk it tbh.

Also kinda off topic but which component of Anelas is giving you a sting? Im about to stack BPC157/TB500 and maybe consider adding GHK-Cu later, but if the former has a sting I wanna know beforehand so im ready! 😹
 
Well, I have zero worries about sting. I use the Anela protocol with GHK-Cu. Now THAT is a stinger!

However, I am a bit more concerned with jelling . . . Are we talking an interesting viscosity . . . Or are we talking too thick for the syringe?
No jelling with my AMO Tirz or Cagri so far and both are working as intended (unless the half life of Mounjaro is months... Not)
 
Thank you for sharing this @DevynL90 - it's much appreciated

I posted pics of a previous T30 batch I had that did the gel-ing for ~5 or so minutes, but did fully dissolve. You can go to my profile and check my posts to find the pics. However, that batch gave me a terrible ISR that no other tirz did (namebrand,compounded, etc.), so I got a replacement batch.

Replacement T30 gave no ISR, is very effective, no complaints. I have another thread on that specific batch going as well.
 
Cant lie my first kit was from Amo, no complaints. Im finding other vendors to be far more economical for variety and long term buying though.


If you search around in the amo threads theres at least one user reporting that their vial gelled up to a concerning amount after reconstituting. They discarded it. Stinging I could put up with (within reason), gelling I wouldnt risk it tbh.

Also kinda off topic but which component of Anelas is giving you a sting? Im about to stack BPC157/TB500 and maybe consider adding GHK-Cu later, but if the former has a sting I wanna know beforehand so im ready! 😹
I have read (on the interwebs so it must be true) that GHK-Cu has a “Ph” that causes the sting. I have not taken BPC157 (Body Protection Compound, right?) nor TB5000 either alone OR together as I was seeking the skin/hair benefit of GHK-Cu having lost 50+# in six months.

But to fully address the point of your post, Anela suggests some specific physicalities of GHK-Cu including small cluster pins/massage gun to disperse subq minimizing the sting. Some have mentioned that pinning on hips is less stinging that belly. :-)
 
Sorry for the ignorance, but what is TFA?

TFA stands for trifluoroacetic acid. It is used in several stages of peptide synthesis and purification

It's a "forever chemical" meaning it will not break down over time in the soil. If it was present, it doesn't stay long in your body. Very small amounts are allowed in medicine; typically less than 0.1% or 1,000 ppm.

Higher amounts are harmful to humans. Probably not great for aquatic life...
 
Hello. I am new here. Please don’t yell at me. I just got banned off Reddit for talking about gray.

I too have fluffy pucks from around that same time and the same vendor. I have been wondering these last weeks why fluffy is less preferable than solid. Can someone clue me in.

Yes, I have googled it.
What did you say that got you banned?
 
Ooooh I thought you were banned from the app entirely
I’ve been on Reddit for 11 years, and most users are losing their mind if you mention peptides, biohacking, or any health idea that isn’t mainstream.

I had a bunch of women from a pop culture-esqe sub go through my comment history recently and call these ideas crockpot, woo woo, and myself hypocritical for having plastic surgery while arguing against gov regulations that are impeding US health. Unfortunately, many believe gray peptide practice is akin to shooting heroin or meth 💀
 

Trending content

Latest posts

Forum statistics

Threads
1,680
Messages
26,317
Members
3,260
Latest member
goldenranger
Back
Top