GYC shipping vials with zero peptides detected

fetefille

Registered
Joined
Jul 18, 2024
Messages
143
Reaction score
455
Location
US
From the scattered info between the GYC server and the Swiss server, T40 from gb 9, and maybe gb 11, have zero tirz detected.

The attached is from customer test
 

Attachments

  • IMG_1982.jpg
    IMG_1982.jpg
    705.6 KB · Views: 105
Gosh darn it, now we can't even trust the people testing our black market weight loss drugs! What is the world coming to?
PT has been blind tested for numerous times, if they suddenly started messing up Tirz tests it would be huge news. They also double check strange results like this.

Previous results for the t40 from gyc are suspected from a different batch.

There could be lots of different scenarios for what happened,
No peptide added
Wrong peptide added
There is some current talk that the Freight Forwarder a few vendors were using might have been stealing and replacing the vials with duds.

Considering this test was paid for by gyc, it's unlikely they intentionally screwed anyone here. We'll see how it's handled.

This one is going to take a minute to unfold.
 
PT has been blind tested for numerous times, if they suddenly started messing up Tirz tests it would be huge news. They also double check strange results like this.

Previous results for the t40 from gyc are suspected from a different batch.

There could be lots of different scenarios for what happened,
No peptide added
Wrong peptide added
There is some current talk that the Freight Forwarder a few vendors were using might have been stealing and replacing the vials with duds.

Considering this test was paid for by gyc, it's unlikely they intentionally screwed anyone here. We'll see how it's handled.

This one is going to take a minute to unfold.
Sorry, my humor doesn't always translate well through text.
 
I mean, this is literally the BEST case scenario for GB in a way for 3rd party testing, vendor pays for testing, vendor fails testing, all customers are immediately refunded. This wasn't hidden or covered up, and is directly on GYC's own discord for everyone to see.

OBVIOUSLY the "bestest" case scenario is everyone gets their peptides and they test well, but if we all agree that we can't trust vendor testing themselves in their lab (which I think we all agree on), this kind of stuff is bound to happen in some form or fashion. The that fact that the vendor paid for the tests and the customers got to choose the vials, this is like 100% my dream failure scenario.

I think we focus too much on the fact that "someone failed" rather than the method by which the failure occurred and remediation happened that matters to me. Open, transparent failures are GREAT.

Quick edit: GYC hasn't responded yet (this happened while China was asleep), but I imagine they will just refund everything (it would be a death knell if they didn't IMO)
 
Last edited:
I mean, this is literally the BEST case scenario for GB in a way for 3rd party testing, vendor pays for testing, vendor fails testing, all customers are immediately refunded. This wasn't hidden or covered up, and is directly on GYC's own discord for everyone to see.

OBVIOUSLY the "bestest" case scenario is everyone gets their peptides and they test well, but if we all agree that we can't trust vendor testing themselves in their lab (which I think we all agree on), this kind of stuff is bound to happen in some form or fashion. The that fact that the vendor paid for the tests and the customers got to choose the vials, this is like 100% my dream failure scenario.

I think we focus too much on the fact that "someone failed" rather than the method by which the failure occurred and remediation happened that matters to me. Open, transparent failures are GREAT.

Quick edit: GYC hasn't responded yet (this happened while China was asleep), but I imagine they will just refund everything (it would be a death knell if they didn't IMO)
Absolutely agreed, They'll either refund/reship or they're done. I'm really banking on the first two because I ordered some of that sweet cheap reta last week.
 
Lisa of GYC has made this announcement in their server:

@everyone
1. Hello everyone, sorry for late reply. We just finished an internal emergency meeting.
2. We would like to make our position clear that GYC's original intention will not change. For the quality of the product we will be based on the test report 100% implementation of qualified products replacement (direct from our own warehouse)
3. We have conducted a preliminary internal investigation from the production of goods to the transportation of the entire chain. GYC has 4 warehouses in China, G1, G2, G3 and G4 at the Shenzhen port. The G4 warehouse is shared with the freight forwarder. At present, the most suspicious point is the sealing link of the freight forwarder, and we will start the investigation in the G4 warehouse.
4. GYC has already started to investigate and follow up the goods sent from G4, and will arrange testing as soon as possible. This incident is unprecedented for GYC. We would like to reiterate our attitude: GYC will be responsible to the end and solve the problem thoroughly.
5. After this incident, GYC will immediately adjust the new operation mode to ensure that there is no longer any loophole in any part of the process. GYC could not have come all the way without the support of all of you, and many of you have been with us from the very beginning of GYC to the present. Thank you very much, and we apologize for what happened this time. But GYC has never avoided problems, we will solve them head on!
 

Trending content

Latest posts

Forum statistics

Threads
1,977
Messages
32,898
Members
3,595
Latest member
glpjuan
Back
Top