I found a new vendor on Finnrick who have a fair few test results. Curious if anyone has heard about them or any other info

[Gypsyking]

Recently searching through finnrick vendors/test results and come across Stella - Qing Li Peptides

Has anyone used or heard of this company before?

What are your experiences?

I've recently placed an order 19/9/2025

Will send some updates with the process.

 

[Gypsyking]

Nobody knows if someone paid someone, to get good coa's on a website. Not that I know, but Finnrick is questionable.
And they have some bad COA's too.
I wouldn't buy from those results.
But tell us how it goes.

3 things here.

1) Check SSA results on Finnricks (well known company here and they've got plenty of trash results for simple things like not labeling their vials or less then 98%)

2) Do your due diligence, find the the company mentioned and ask for their Janoshik test results and then compare to the actual janoshik website to find out if they're legit.

3) If you're considering buying get it tested yourself or there's plenty of groups that group test.

 

[Gypsyking]

No. The 13 mg is 13 mg of the target peptide. Overfill is good so long as you know about it and reconstitute based upon the actual amount in the vial.

So how do you know the purity is low and full of endotoxins then? Are you relying on finnricks testing? Or have you done any tests yourself? Or are you simple just assuming because you have zero knowledge of the company?

Most peptides finnricks tested lose points for the simple fact they aren't labelled which is basically all Chinese peptides. Generally they're all overfilled which apparently is a good thing if known about.

This whole post has been made an absolute joke of but it seems no one's actually gone out of their way and done any real research!

Another thing. All these "vendors" you buy from that you think are safe, most of them are produced from the same factory if you haven't already figured that out. All these vendors are are a distributor.

Fed up with the know it alls. Do your own damn research before pretending you know what the f....k you're talking about.

 

[Gypsyking]

Nobody knows if someone paid someone, to get good coa's on a website. Not that I know, but Finnrick is questionable.
And they have some bad COA's too.
I wouldn't buy from those results.
But tell us how it goes.

And You're on here raving about shit you know f..k all about. SSA was one of the most trusted sources.

 

[keangkong]

So how do you know the purity is low and full of endotoxins then? Are you relying on finnricks testing? Or have you done any tests yourself? Or are you simple just assuming because you have zero knowledge of the company?

Most peptides finnricks tested lose points for the simple fact they aren't labelled which is basically all Chinese peptides. Generally they're all overfilled which apparently is a good thing if known about.

This whole post has been made an absolute joke of but it seems no one's actually gone out of their way and done any real research!

Another thing. All these "vendors" you buy from that you think are safe, most of them are produced from the same factory if you haven't already figured that out. All these vendors are are a distributor.

Fed up with the know it alls. Do your own damn research before pretending you know what the f....k you're talking about.

You seem quite angry about what I said. However, your post didn't seem to address what I actually wrote. While you accuse me of having done no research, I have read posts by Peptide Tests and Janoshik explaining how to read a COA from them. Do you want me to start testing these in my own laboratory? That's a task for which I'd be wholly unqualified.

 

[Gypsyking]

You seem quite angry about what I said. However, your post didn't seem to address what I actually wrote. While you accuse me of having done no research, I have read posts by Peptide Tests and Janoshik explaining how to read a COA from them. Do you want me to start testing these in my own laboratory? That's a task for which I'd be wholly unqualified.

Maybe you've caught me on a bad day. Sorry about that. My original reply was suppose to be to vishy.
I've copped it from pillar to post about this vendor and all I asked was for anyone else experiences.

As a community, pretty piss poor behaviour.

Every single person here is taking risk buying in the grey market. Everyone quick to atttack without doing any research. Seems to be the world we live in now a days.

 

[byefatlicia]

As a community, pretty piss poor behaviour.

Every single person here is taking risk buying in the grey market. Everyone quick to atttack without doing any research.

My Pop used to say: "Why did you ask my opinion when you already made your mind up what your'e gonna do? Were you trying to get my blessing and got angry with me when I disagreed?"

You are right. None of us have done the research. I'm sorry to have given my input. I'm not a scientist. I'm not qualified.
Time to stop getting angry and just do what you want. 🙂

 

[Gypsyking]

My Pop used to say: "Why did you ask my opinion when you already made your mind up what your'e gonna do? Were you trying to get my blessing and got angry with me when I disagreed?"

You are right. None of us have done the research. I'm sorry to have given my input. I'm not a scientist. I'm not qualified.
Time to stop getting angry and just do what you want. 🙂

You've missed the point completely.

I asked for anyone else's experiences if any not a judgement on how I found the company.

I think you're right, if you haven't done any research, looked into the company and checked their testing yourself maybe keep your opinion to yourself also

 

[ZippityDooDah]

I asked for anyone else's experiences if any not a judgement on how I found the company.

How you found the company is part of other people's experiences, and people's experiences with Finnrocks tend to suggest that they are not a trustworthy source for vendor info so you really can't be upset with people trying to HELP you by suggesting you consider other avenues as a source for finding vendors.

 

[Gypsyking]

How you found the company is part of other people's experiences, and people's experiences with Finnrocks tend to suggest that they are not a trustworthy source for vendor info so you really can't be upset with people trying to HELP you by suggesting you consider other avenues as a source for finding vendors.

Can appreciate that.

 

[chmuse]

You've missed the point completely.

I asked for anyone else's experiences if any not a judgement on how I found the company.

I think you're right, if you haven't done any research, looked into the company and checked their testing yourself maybe keep your opinion to yourself also

Hey,

One of the reasons SSA was trusted is there has been EXTENSIVE testing on their product. I'd say their testing is on par with most of the bigger vendors- QSC back in the day, SRY, even Nexa. The COA's are often not posted here, since people tend to do group testing and do not want to share a test they funded to people who did not contribute. I've joined many of those tests myself; it's not uncommon for the rule to be results are not released unless something dangerous is found.

For your future reference, endotoxin testing has largely been found to be a waste of time and money. As far as I'm aware, an unsafe level has not ever been found.

Sterility is also largely a waste of time.

Mass and purity are usually done in the same test, so if you test for mass you will also receive a purity score. I'd consider doing some research into what purity means in the case of our research; it's largely a useless number used for marketing and to make us feel good. It only measures how much of the product similar to what we are testing for is actually the product. If they aren't testing for arsenic, they won't find the arsenic.

Finnrick is not how I'd suggest finding a vendor in the future, but I'm glad it's worked out for you! I would search for some of the interviews Peptide Test and Janoshik have done to better understand the science behind testing, and why not all labs are equal.

 

[Gypsyking]

Hey,

One of the reasons SSA was trusted is there has been EXTENSIVE testing on their product. I'd say their testing is on par with most of the bigger vendors- QSC back in the day, SRY, even Nexa. The COA's are often not posted here, since people tend to do group testing and do not want to share a test they funded to people who did not contribute. I've joined many of those tests myself; it's not uncommon for the rule to be results are not released unless something dangerous is found.

For your future reference, endotoxin testing has largely been found to be a waste of time and money. As far as I'm aware, an unsafe level has not ever been found.

Sterility is also largely a waste of time.

Mass and purity are usually done in the same test, so if you test for mass you will also receive a purity score. I'd consider doing some research into what purity means in the case of our research; it's largely a useless number used for marketing and to make us feel good. It only measures how much of the product similar to what we are testing for is actually the product. If they aren't testing for arsenic, they won't find the arsenic.

Finnrick is not how I'd suggest finding a vendor in the future, but I'm glad it's worked out for you! I would search for some of the interviews Peptide Test and Janoshik have done to better understand the science behind testing, and why not all labs are equal.

That's extremely useful information. I was under the assumption that if any peptide had a 10eu or greater than 5eu present you would present with fevers, rapid heart rate, muscle aches, etc.

The real reason I looked into the company is because they have had so many finnricks tests done which I assumed meant a lot of people must trust or purchase from them.

When I reached out, they actually test their own batches as well as group testing - janoshik.

They have an extensive amount of verified Janoshik tests the same as SSA
And with my purchase they provided the verified Janoshik tests within the month I purchased all the products. Eg I bought in late September and they provided tests sent in late August. While that doesn't mean my vials are within the original tested batch, you can still group test.

Seems legit to me.

 

[keangkong]

That's extremely useful information. I was under the assumption that if any peptide had a 10eu or greater than 5eu present you would present with fevers, rapid heart rate, muscle aches, etc.

The real reason I looked into the company is because they have had so many finnricks tests done which I assumed meant a lot of people must trust or purchase from them.

When I reached out, they actually test their own batches as well as group testing - janoshik.

They have an extensive amount of verified Janoshik tests the same as SSA
And with my purchase they provided the verified Janoshik tests within the month I purchased all the products. Eg I bought in late September and they provided tests sent in late August. While that doesn't mean my vials are within the original tested batch, you can still group test.

Seems legit to me.

Some folks says that vendor-supplied testing is useless. While I don't go quite that far, any time that you use a vendor-supplied test, even if it's a reliable testing company and the COA shows up as being real on the testing company's website, you're still relying upon the vendor having sent a representative sample instead of a known good sample to the vendor. That makes vendor-supplied testing far less reliable than third-party testing.

 

[indolent]

One of the reasons SSA was trusted is there has been EXTENSIVE testing on their product

Unfortunately, SSA's failure to batch-ID properly (or even pretend to do so) made all third-party group testing more iffy than usual.

 

[Gypsyking]

Some folks says that vendor-supplied testing is useless. While I don't go quite that far, any time that you use a vendor-supplied test, even if it's a reliable testing company and the COA shows up as being real on the testing company's website, you're still relying upon the vendor having sent a representative sample instead of a known good sample to the vendor. That makes vendor-supplied testing far less reliable than third-party testing.

Appreciate the input.

Definitely still going to get my vials tested. Just curious, does anyone know a company in Aus that do HPLC testing?

 

[chmuse]

That's extremely useful information. I was under the assumption that if any peptide had a 10eu or greater than 5eu present you would present with fevers, rapid heart rate, muscle aches, etc.

The real reason I looked into the company is because they have had so many finnricks tests done which I assumed meant a lot of people must trust or purchase from them.

When I reached out, they actually test their own batches as well as group testing - janoshik.

They have an extensive amount of verified Janoshik tests the same as SSA
And with my purchase they provided the verified Janoshik tests within the month I purchased all the products. Eg I bought in late September and they provided tests sent in late August. While that doesn't mean my vials are within the original tested batch, you can still group test.

Seems legit to me.

I was unaware they did more than accept samples and send out to random labs. Their strategy has probably changed; it absolutely tracks that they've found a way to offset the cost of the free tests they were providing. Janoshik is considered gold standard, both because he has a long track record and because a vendor will not fix a problem if the test was done by anyone else. Finnrick was initially sending things to a wide variety of labs for free, some labs no one had heard of, and others that were known to be unreliable. The standards used between labs was inconsistent, with some even showing a purity of greater than 100%. I, personally, wrote them off. It makes sense for them to have finally developed a clear businesses strategy. Providing free tests without a clear way of making money was always sketchy.

Unfortunately, SSA's failure to batch-ID properly (or even pretend to do so) made all third-party group testing more iffy than usual.

Do any vendors do a proper batch ID outside of custom ordered, large batches? That's a genuine question; I don't typically deal directly with a vendor for a myriad of reasons, and was under the impression none provide proper batch information. I believe it was LSPL (now banned for offering free bac for reviews) who claimed all of the product was the same, despite their orange caps not matching between kits. JHT had the same color caps and crimps, but the shape of the vial itself varied. (As well as all of the other issues they had, but I'm just giving an example.) Some group buys will receive kits with two different colored caps, and are forced to do twice the testing because you can't trust the vendor when they say it's all the same batch. When you're buying black market peptides, you are accepting a certain level of risk.

 

[keangkong]

The standards used between labs was inconsistent, with some even showing a purity of greater than 100%.

I'll only purchase from vendors who have a minimum purity percentage of 110%. If the vendor is not going to make an effort, why should I buy from that vendor.

 

[keangkong]

Appreciate the input.

Definitely still going to get my vials tested. Just curious, does anyone know a company in Aus that do HPLC testing?

I wish I did. That would mean that I was living in Australia.

 

[keangkong]

I know that I'm prohibited by the rules of Peppys from posting their stuff. However, I think I'm allowed to include hyperlinks to their password protected site. I'm including the hyperlink to the html summary page for Lab FAQ Guide with Janoshik Analytical. Once you get to that page, assuming that you're a member of Peppys, you can then download or view the .pdf non-summary version. It has all types of good information in it. If you're not a member of Peppys, look at my signature for a link on how to join. As usual, I agree with almost everything @chmuse wrote on this topic.

 

[keangkong]

When you're buying black market peptides, you are accepting a certain level of risk.

I believe the safety standards practiced while producing GLP-1 peptides are low. Due to how the medicines work, the nature of lyophilized peptides, and their subcutaneous mode of administration, the dangers are still relatively low. I'm also trusting Chinese folks to be less likely than Americans to intentionally poison strangers.

 

[latviantower]

This was a great roller coaster of a thread. I enjoyed the ride tremendously. Fine example of what’s good about this community. We keep speaking to each other even when things get prickly. Thanks to all of you. Wish my family and friends could do the same.

 

[latviantower]

I would volunteer to lead us in group singing but I can’t decide between “Kum By Yah” or Monty Python’s “Bright Side of Life.”

 

[FamousGoodkitty]

I'll send some updates as the process plays out. Testing, shipping, tracking. Etc

That would be great to follow. Hopefully you've found yourself a new vendor you like; but if not, you are helping others by following through and giving us your experiences and take on things you purchase from them. Thank you for taking the time.

 

[miss-sanne]

L

Hey,

One of the reasons SSA was trusted is there has been EXTENSIVE testing on their product. I'd say their testing is on par with most of the bigger vendors- QSC back in the day, SRY, even Nexa. The COA's are often not posted here, since people tend to do group testing and do not want to share a test they funded to people who did not contribute. I've joined many of those tests myself; it's not uncommon for the rule to be results are not released unless something dangerous is found.

For your future reference, endotoxin testing has largely been found to be a waste of time and money. As far as I'm aware, an unsafe level has not ever been found.

Sterility is also largely a waste of time.

Mass and purity are usually done in the same test, so if you test for mass you will also receive a purity score. I'd consider doing some research into what purity means in the case of our research; it's largely a useless number used for marketing and to make us feel good. It only measures how much of the product similar to what we are testing for is actually the product. If they aren't testing for arsenic, they won't find the arsenic.

Finnrick is not how I'd suggest finding a vendor in the future, but I'm glad it's worked out for you! I would search for some of the interviews Peptide Test and Janoshik have done to better understand the science behind testing, and why not all labs are equal.

Love your answer

 

[desinr-gal]

Moving forward I'm actually going to do the chicken dance in a pentagram on the floor while the moon light points me to my next purchase!

A Ouija board is my go to..

 

[HoopFan]

A Ouija board is my go to..

I flip a small child. Heads or butts!





no…no I don't really.

 

[chmuse]

I know that I'm prohibited by the rules of Peppys from posting their stuff. However, I think I'm allowed to include hyperlinks to their password protected site. I'm including the hyperlink to the html summary page for Lab FAQ Guide with Janoshik Analytical. Once you get to that page, assuming that you're a member of Peppys, you can then download or view the .pdf non-summary version. It has all types of good information in it. If you're not a member of Peppys, look at my signature for a link on how to join. As usual, I agree with almost everything @chmuse wrote on this topic.

Oooh thank you. I really wish I could get used to their UI, every time I try to find something I end up getting frustrated and giving up. I'm definitely about to go down a rabbit hole again.

I flip a small child. Heads or butts!





no…no I don't really.

Are you implying research toddlers are not valid test subjects?

 

[Gypsyking]

Nobody knows if someone paid someone, to get good coa's on a website. Not that I know, but Finnrick is questionable.
And they have some bad COA's too.
I wouldn't buy from those results.
But tell us how it goes.

Have a look at SSA and SRY test results. I'm relying on janoshik. Also, these test results show purity, over fill or underfill but they get bad results for not having a label for instance or batch id