FGP Latest COA (Janoshik)

Attachments

  • BC10.webp
    BC10.webp
    18.8 KB · Views: 1
  • CP10.webp
    CP10.webp
    21.1 KB · Views: 2
  • CU50.webp
    CU50.webp
    18.5 KB · Views: 2
  • G5K.webp
    G5K.webp
    18 KB · Views: 2
  • H24.webp
    H24.webp
    20.9 KB · Views: 1
  • H36.webp
    H36.webp
    20.6 KB · Views: 2
  • KLOW80.webp
    KLOW80.webp
    61.8 KB · Views: 2

Attachments

  • H36.webp
    H36.webp
    20.6 KB · Views: 2
  • KLOW80.webp
    KLOW80.webp
    61.8 KB · Views: 2
  • KPV10.webp
    KPV10.webp
    18 KB · Views: 2
  • MS10.webp
    MS10.webp
    29.2 KB · Views: 2
  • NJ500.webp
    NJ500.webp
    18.7 KB · Views: 1
  • RT5.webp
    RT5.webp
    20.5 KB · Views: 1
  • RT20.webp
    RT20.webp
    58.4 KB · Views: 1
  • SK10.webp
    SK10.webp
    18.2 KB · Views: 2
  • SM10.webp
    SM10.webp
    20.7 KB · Views: 2
Based on my personal experience, the COAs being provided appear to be old and do not seem to reflect recently produced batches. One of my biggest concerns is the lack of batch-specific testing to demonstrate ongoing consistency and transparency.

I specifically asked whether the products I would receive would have batch numbers that matched the testing documentation. When my order arrived, there were no batch numbers on the kits, making it impossible to verify that the product in hand corresponds to the COA provided.

I was told the product came from the same batch that had been tested, but the vial I received differed in size and color from the vial shown on the COA. Without matching batch numbers or other traceable identifiers, there is no reliable way for customers to cross-reference the product they receive with the testing documentation being presented.

For me, transparency means current testing, batch identification, and a clear chain of verification. Without those things, it's difficult to have confidence that the COA actually represents the product being sold today.
 
Last edited:
I can tell you by personal experience, that these coa’s are old. They don’t test new batches to show consistency and transparency. They had one test done one time and even though you ask them if the products you’re buying come with batch numbers They will lie. You won’t get the batch that they actually had tested. They try to tell you it’s the same batch but the picture of the vial is different size and color. There’s no way to cross reference what you have.
We guarantee that this product is entirely free of defects. If you can provide a test report issued by Janoshik demonstrating that this is not the case, we pledge to refund double your purchase price.
 

Attachments

  • BC10.webp
    BC10.webp
    18.8 KB · Views: 1
  • CP10.webp
    CP10.webp
    21.1 KB · Views: 1
  • CU50.webp
    CU50.webp
    18.5 KB · Views: 1
  • G5K.webp
    G5K.webp
    18 KB · Views: 1
  • H24.webp
    H24.webp
    20.9 KB · Views: 1
  • H36.webp
    H36.webp
    20.6 KB · Views: 1
  • KPV10.webp
    KPV10.webp
    18 KB · Views: 1
  • MS10.webp
    MS10.webp
    29.2 KB · Views: 1

Attachments

  • BC10.webp
    BC10.webp
    18.8 KB · Views: 1
  • CP10.webp
    CP10.webp
    21.1 KB · Views: 1
  • CU50.webp
    CU50.webp
    18.5 KB · Views: 1
  • G5K.webp
    G5K.webp
    18 KB · Views: 2
  • H24.webp
    H24.webp
    20.9 KB · Views: 1
  • H36.webp
    H36.webp
    20.6 KB · Views: 1
  • KLOW80.webp
    KLOW80.webp
    61.8 KB · Views: 1
  • KPV10.webp
    KPV10.webp
    18 KB · Views: 1
  • NJ500.webp
    NJ500.webp
    18.7 KB · Views: 2
  • RT5.webp
    RT5.webp
    20.5 KB · Views: 1

Attachments

  • G5K.webp
    G5K.webp
    18 KB · Views: 1
  • H24.webp
    H24.webp
    20.9 KB · Views: 1
  • H36.webp
    H36.webp
    20.6 KB · Views: 2
  • KPV10.webp
    KPV10.webp
    18 KB · Views: 1
  • NJ500.webp
    NJ500.webp
    18.7 KB · Views: 1
  • RT5.webp
    RT5.webp
    20.5 KB · Views: 2
  • RT20.webp
    RT20.webp
    58.4 KB · Views: 2

Attachments

  • G5K.webp
    G5K.webp
    18 KB · Views: 1
  • H24.webp
    H24.webp
    20.9 KB · Views: 1
  • H36.webp
    H36.webp
    20.6 KB · Views: 1
  • KPV10.webp
    KPV10.webp
    18 KB · Views: 1
  • NJ500.webp
    NJ500.webp
    18.7 KB · Views: 1
  • RT5.webp
    RT5.webp
    20.5 KB · Views: 1
  • RT20.webp
    RT20.webp
    58.4 KB · Views: 1

Attachments

  • G5K.webp
    G5K.webp
    18 KB · Views: 1
  • H24.webp
    H24.webp
    20.9 KB · Views: 2
  • H36.webp
    H36.webp
    20.6 KB · Views: 1
  • KLOW80.webp
    KLOW80.webp
    61.8 KB · Views: 1
  • KPV10.webp
    KPV10.webp
    18 KB · Views: 1

Attachments

  • RT5.webp
    RT5.webp
    20.5 KB · Views: 1
  • RT20.webp
    RT20.webp
    58.4 KB · Views: 1
  • SK10.webp
    SK10.webp
    18.2 KB · Views: 1
  • TR10.webp
    TR10.webp
    59 KB · Views: 1
  • TR30.webp
    TR30.webp
    19.5 KB · Views: 1
  • TR60.webp
    TR60.webp
    20.5 KB · Views: 1

Attachments

  • G5K.webp
    G5K.webp
    18 KB · Views: 3
  • H24.webp
    H24.webp
    20.9 KB · Views: 2
  • H36.webp
    H36.webp
    20.6 KB · Views: 2
  • KLOW80.webp
    KLOW80.webp
    61.8 KB · Views: 2
  • KPV10.webp
    KPV10.webp
    18 KB · Views: 2
  • MS10.webp
    MS10.webp
    29.2 KB · Views: 2
  • NJ500.webp
    NJ500.webp
    18.7 KB · Views: 2
  • RT20.webp
    RT20.webp
    58.4 KB · Views: 2
  • SK10.webp
    SK10.webp
    18.2 KB · Views: 2
  • KPV10 - 副本 (2).webp
    KPV10 - 副本 (2).webp
    18 KB · Views: 2

Attachments

  • BC10.webp
    BC10.webp
    18.8 KB · Views: 2
  • CP10.webp
    CP10.webp
    21.1 KB · Views: 1
  • CU50.webp
    CU50.webp
    18.5 KB · Views: 1
  • G5K.webp
    G5K.webp
    18 KB · Views: 1
  • H24.webp
    H24.webp
    20.9 KB · Views: 1
  • H36.webp
    H36.webp
    20.6 KB · Views: 1
  • KLOW80.webp
    KLOW80.webp
    61.8 KB · Views: 2
May I ask, why are most of your COAs listed with Sample Received dates that are earlier than the Testing Ordered dates?

Janoshik's tests are first ordered, then shipped (For example, like the COA for KLOW you have posted, from nearly 8 months ago). The COAs for everything on this post except KLOW suggest the sample was received with no test order, and they held it at the lab for 9 days without a test order? Maybe they do that, but it does not appear to be correct.

It feels weird, looking through these COAs. I know there were weird date issues for someone else with the Analysis Conducted Date of 1970. I understand that was a mistake by the lab. But these mixed up dates, for so many products seems strange.

It is also strange that the vendor TOP had these very same COAs posted over a month ago. Is Flourish the same company as TOP?
 
Last edited:

Trending Topics

Forum Statistics

Threads
17,724
Posts
184,051
Members
59,548
Newest
Jeffie4k
Back
Top Bottom