Right now they call it LB2839
Ive found it a few times but its the science research sites not necessarily geared for us . Its also crazy expensive.
What type of smart watch can tell body muscle mass?
Samsung Smart Watch. It uses bioelectrical impedance like smart scales. Obviously not super accurate, but trends and averages are useful
Are you using it? Is it a pin or a supplement?
Straight from PMC, “Ideally, weight loss should be derived almost exclusively from the fat mass compartment as this is the main driver of metabolic disease, however, several studies have shown that there is an accompanying loss of tissue from the fat-free compartment, especially skeletal muscle. Population groups including post-menopausal women, the elderly, those with metabolic disease and athletes may be particularly at risk of skeletal muscle loss when following a weight management programme. Research studies that have addressed this issue across a range of population groups are reviewed with a focus upon the contribution of resistance and endurance forms of exercise and a higher intake dietary protein above the current guideline of 0.8 g/kg body weight/day. While findings can be contradictory, overall, the consensus appears that fat-free and skeletal muscle masses can be preserved, albeit to varying degrees by including both forms of exercise (but especially resistance forms) in the weight management intervention. Equally, higher intakes of protein can protect loss of these body compartments, acting either separately or synergistically with exercise. Elderly individuals in particular may benefit most from this approach. Thus, the evidence supports the recommendations for intakes of protein above the current guidelines of 0.8 g/kg body weight/d for the healthy elderly population to also be incorporated into the dietary prescription for weight management in this age group.”
I think one thing you are forgetting is the age of RS. HGH can be extremely beneficial to older population while Tesa and CJC/Ipa etc can be difficult.
I don’t get why tesa etc is allegedly safer. Let’s say you use either HGH or tesa etc and control it so Igf levels are the same. Is tesa etc safer? And is it easier to reach a specific Igf level with tesa etc? Finally, I’m sure I’ve said this already. Glp does not decrease muscle mass any more than a calorie deficit without it. People have lost too much muscle on cuts for many decades before glp. It’s why, for example, you can lose less muscle on a slow cut. Last finally, and HGH is prescribed a lot less than other compounds for muscle loss, and what is prescribed, will tell you a lot.
Tesa uses your own pituitary gland and body's resources to produce HGH. Exogenous GH assumes pituitary is blasted and then just bypasses the normal mechanism.
