GLP-1 Forum

Mixed messages - klow/glow and history of cancer

littledragon25

GLP-1 Enthusiast
Member Since
Sep 14, 2025
Posts
124
Likes Received
281
From
West midlands UK
I've tried a search here and another forum. I'm currently just a newbie on Peppys so not found much there either. I'm getting mixed info about GLOW/KLOW and it's suitability for my research subject, who has a history of cancer (2018 treated via surgery and radiation, annually monitored, no sign of recurrence).

Some sources are saying go for it, but avoid MT-1/MT-2, others are saying no growth hormone based peptides, and some sources are saying the bpc-157/tb-500 in glow/klow are a no-no for any history of cancer.

I've researched myself around in circles and I feel it's because there is mixed opinion out there. I'm curious to see what the feeling is here. Yay or nay? Or proceed with caution on a temporary basis?

For what it's worth, research is mainly into hair and skin health so the ghk-cu is the main draw, but some niggles with an old rotator cuff injury and fear of the copper burn brought me to look at the blends.
 
I have the same question, since having had a melanoma removed in 2019. I am risking it with Klow, and I too have seen conflicting info. I have eliminated other cancer causing things from my life, so I'm hoping that will be enough to keep me safe.
 
Look up Dr. Bhatti , MD oncologist on tik tok (I know I know...) , several videos. He recommends avoiding klow, glow, tb500, bpc, all the -morelin's etc because they all share angiogensis pathways, same pathways that cancer spreads.
 
Look up Dr. Bhatti , MD oncologist on tik tok (I know I know...) , several videos. He recommends avoiding klow, glow, tb500, bpc, all the -morelin's etc because they all share angiogensis pathways, same pathways that cancer spreads.
He was one of the sources I'd been looking at. Meanwhile other healthcare professionals on the same platform are saying it can help heal post-cancer scarring etc. so the message really is mixed and even from medical professionals.

I think I might try one cycle of bpc-157 only for the shoulder as the more critical of the sources all say absolute no to tb-500 but maybe to bpc-157 short term. Short term, I can't see how it's much more risky than many other things we do that can cause cancer. I mean, the subject had radiation to the brain... Cancer treatment can literally cause more cancer.

Then I think I'll stick to just ghk-cu for what I want it for which is hair/skin health.
 
I'm taking GHK-CU with KPV for hair and skin and missing out the rest! Cancer is common on my paternal side and I don't want to encourage it.
 
I'm taking GHK-CU with KPV for hair and skin and missing out the rest! Cancer is common on my paternal side and I don't want to encourage it.
I would love to know more about this option.. How much of each? and how are the injections working as far as ISR and or pain? Are the benefits like Klow?
I have a history of skin cancer..
 
I've been researching peptides for months and months and love digging up anecdotal accounts from users. So far I've seen zero accounts from anyone who thinks BPC-157/TB500 worsened their cancer prognosis. Maybe this is because the general consensus is that the angiogenesis promoting action of these compounds can cause cancer to metastasize quicker so at-risk people tend to avoid them.

I have read one account from a user on reddit who has a prostate tumor that was treated and in remission who has been a long-term user of BPC-157/TB500 and it hasn't had a negative effect for him (yet).

Also, there was one study that showed that BPC-157 added to cancer cells in a petri dish environment showed anti-cancerous properties.

So, probably no closer to an answer. If it were me and I knew I had cancerous growth or a high potential for them, I'd likely avoid those peptides. It all comes down to your personal risk tolerance.
 

Trending Topics

Latest Posts

Forum Statistics

Threads
6,147
Posts
78,118
Members
17,896
Newest
SamLloydPascual
Top Bottom