Nexaph testing

[noteablequotable]

Even though it’s still a little nerve wracking, I prefer the crypto route. I also know there’s something with QSC, if you do bank transfer, I think it has to come out of checking and not savings, but I’m not sure.

I've had good experiences with ASC. They still offer PayPal, and while there have been some hiccups they are incredibly quick to resolve things in a way that favors the customer (offering refunds and replacements instead of discounts and credits). They actually had a stock issue on my very first order and not only did they let me know as soon as they realized it, they gave me a refund within a few minutes of me deciding on that solution.

So far as I know they don't need to run any clinical trials so I feel safer working with them than Nexaph (for now).

 

[nurseratchit]

I've had good experiences with ASC. They still offer PayPal, and while there have been some hiccups they are incredibly quick to resolve things in a way that favors the customer (offering refunds and replacements instead of discounts and credits). They actually had a stock issue on my very first order and not only did they let me know as soon as they realized it, they gave me a refund within a few minutes of me deciding on that solution.

So far as I know they don't need to run any clinical trials so I feel safer working with them than Nexaph (for now).

ASC was my 2nd grey order and also a good experience for me. The only thing I noticed recently is that they only guarantee >98% purity whereas most other vendors guarantee >99%. I’ve reached out to Tuk about this but, as far as I know that hasn’t changed. My product tested over 99% but just something to keep in mind when considering future purchases. I would also be careful about using PayPal to send directly to a vendor. Have seen several people getting accounts shut down if PP deems it suspicious.

 

[noteablequotable]

ASC was my 2nd grey order and also a good experience for me. The only thing I noticed recently is that they only guarantee >98% purity whereas most other vendors guarantee >99%. I’ve reached out to Tuk about this but, as far as I know that hasn’t changed. My product tested over 99% but just something to keep in mind when considering future purchases. I would also be careful about using PayPal to send directly to a vendor. Have seen several people getting accounts shut down if PP deems it suspicious.

I can confirm. I bought a mix of non- GLP-1 peps from them and 2/6 came back at 98%. When I asked about it they said that was standard, but they seemed open to discussing resolutions if I was unhappy. I dropped it since 98% is perfectly fine to use, but it's something to keep in mind.

 

[nurseratchit]

I can confirm. I bought a mix of non- GLP-1 peps from them and 2/6 came back at 98%. When I asked about it they said that was standard, but they seemed open to discussing resolutions if I was unhappy. I dropped it since 98% is perfectly fine to use, but it's something to keep in mind.

Yeah, they are upfront about it at least. I told Tuk they might get more business if they had the same guarantee as most everyone else. I would probably still use over 98% too but then the next question that comes to my mind is the stuff that starts out at lower purity degrading at a faster rate.

 

[JohnnyGobbs]

I’ve already taken so many leaps of faith (no prescription, grey market, Reta not even fda approved lol) that a 1% percent difference from some random UK test that’s over my head anyways isn’t gonna stop me from pinning lol.

 

[gabe323]

98% is the new 99% due to raws availability.

 

[Nikki nik]

You plant a vial in the ground and it grows into a peptide tree

Stop

 

[Fredo frog]

Just got this back last night on the BPC-157. They got the vial yesterday morning and had the results to me last night already- very impressed with the speed. I also sent away for sterility but that will be a couple of weeks. Results are pretty much right in line with the lab results posted on their site.

Can I ask cost to carry this out ?

 

[beefsteak]

Join the Nexaph telegram. He's now scamming people by not honoring purity tests.

First it's 99% under and reship now he retroactively adds a new rule Jano test only and then next new new rule will probably be it was 99% when I shipped it to you cya losers

 

[noteablequotable]

Join the Nexaph telegram. He's now scamming people by not honoring purity tests.

First it's 99% under and reship now he retroactively adds a new rule Jano test only and then next new new rule will probably be it was 99% when I shipped it to you cya losers

To be fair (not that he deserves it at this point) there is currently some drama around whether or not specific labs have been fudging their tests. Sucks for us as customers.

 

[Dee X]

To be fair (not that he deserves it at this point) there is currently some drama around whether or not specific labs have been fudging their tests. Sucks for us as customers.

Could also indicate that the number of refund / reshipment requests have cut quite a bit into his profits.

 

[nccane]

To be fair (not that he deserves it at this point) there is currently some drama around whether or not specific labs have been fudging their tests. Sucks for us as customers.

Im not a homer, but can confirm from the start, he made it clear jano is required. There's screenshots a while back of him saying it.

What made it confusing for some newer individuals was in-house use of TP for marketing/vendor tests due to jano timelines and sponsoring 3rd party test that utilized TP.

Crappy situation, but don't think he's trying to scam people over it. I'd trust Jano the most too.

 

[noteablequotable]

Could also indicate that the number of refund / reshipment requests have cut quite a bit into his profits.

I'm 100% sure that's why he's doing it, I just wanted to clarify that it's not necessarily unreasonable.

 

[noteablequotable]

Im not a homer, but can confirm from the start, he made it clear jano is required. There's screenshots a while back of him saying it.

What made it confusing for some newer individuals was in-house use of TP for marketing/vendor tests due to jano timelines and sponsoring 3rd party test that utilized TP.

Crappy situation, but don't think he's trying to scam people over it. I'd trust Jano the most too.

I will say this:

if he trusts TP enough to use them and sponsor 3rd party tests that use them, he should accept their results for the purposes of issuing refunds / reshipments.

 

[Dee X]

I'm 100% sure that's why he's doing it, I just wanted to clarify that it's not necessarily unreasonable.

Oh for sure. I'm not disagreeing with you either fwiw.

At the end of the day, it's a business.

 

[AndyPanda]

I'm 100% sure that's why he's doing it, I just wanted to clarify that it's not necessarily unreasonable.

I know a lot of people here do not trust Cain. From what I have read, some have good reasons. Especially the weird relationship between him and Dionysus. Personally, I have had good experiences with Nexaph. He responds promptly to inquiries, and for the one reship I received I didn’t need to do anything. I would not have even known anything was wrong with the batch if Cain didn’t tell me. If he did do some shady things in the past, he seems to be trying to make up for it.

 

[nccane]

I will say this:

if he trusts TP enough to use them and sponsor 3rd party tests that use them, he should accept their results for the purposes of issuing refunds / reshipments.

Dont disagree. But not going to downplay the conundrum of the gold standard testing a vial from a kit and giving it a 99.9% after TP tested it at 98.6.

It's a shitty situation. I guess as a business. If you can afford it, you just reship and move on to avoid backlash.

But this is messy. Could have been avoided by not mudding the waters by utilizing tp for vendor tests to cross check Jano.

 

[noteablequotable]

I know a lot of people here do not trust Cain. From what I have read, some have good reasons. Especially the weird relationship between him and Dionysus. Personally, I have had good experiences with Nexaph. He responds promptly to inquiries, and for the one reship I received I didn’t need to do anything. I would not have even known anything was wrong with the batch if Cain didn’t tell me. If he did do some shady things in the past, he seems to be trying to make up for it.

I don't think anyone here has disputed that. We know he's no Cantydes.

Bad results happen, and, I feel like I've already beat this horse to death, but imho HOW the bad results happened and the lack of risk controls to prevent this problem from occuring in the future is an issue for me.

 

[AndyPanda]

I don't think anyone here has disputed that. We know he's no Cantydes.

Bad results happen, and, I feel like I've already beat this horse to death, but imho HOW the bad results happened and the lack of risk controls to prevent this problem from occuring in the future is an issue for me.

I can appreciate that.

 

[glpfun]

Im not a homer, but can confirm from the start, he made it clear jano is required. There's screenshots a while back of him saying it.

What made it confusing for some newer individuals was in-house use of TP for marketing/vendor tests due to jano timelines and sponsoring 3rd party test that utilized TP.

Crappy situation, but don't think he's trying to scam people over it. I'd trust Jano the most too.

Wait so he sponsored testing with a specific third party and isn’t honoring reship with results from that same company? What is TP? I know of PT…

Unless he can demonstrate there is an actual issue with the testing process or results he should honor the reship policy. He is essentially saying that the results are good enough for taking money from you but not good enough for him to give back that money. That’s hypocritical and shitty business.