Nexaph testing

[Dee X]

Nexaph promises 99%, ASC considers 98% acceptable and does not guarantee 99%. So far as I know if anyone contacts Cain about a vial that tests below 99% he makes it right (refund or replacement) and does spot testing by reaching out to other people who also purchased the same batch. Given all of the different factors that can impact purity I don't know what else we should ask for.

If you need to test every batch you get to ensure it is above 99% since some people keep testing on a regular basis under 99%, does that not automatically make you want to test every batch you receive (which in turn increases the cost of the kit significantly)?

 

[noteablequotable]

If you need to test every batch you get to ensure it is above 99% since some people keep testing on a regular basis under 99%, does that not automatically make you want to test every batch you receive (which in turn increases the cost of the kit significantly)?

That's fair. Is there a vendor you trust to deliver 99%+ quality 100% of the time? The only one I can think of is QSC (maybe), but they have horrible customer service and you're SOL if there is an issue with your delivery.

 

[Dee X]

That's fair. Is there a vendor you trust to deliver 99%+ quality 100% of the time? The only one I can think of is QSC (maybe), but they have horrible customer service and you're SOL if there is an issue with your delivery.

Can you share some examples?

 

[peptideusername]

Check out Janoshik's website. Many current Nexaph results (and a great place to find sources )

That’s because, after the test is completed, the option to pay a little more and have the test result published is offered to the customer. And as @exploitedworkerbee pointed out (on another forum), that leads to cherry picking results. Have you ever noticed that there are only good test results on the public page of Jano’s website?

I would argue that right now, until that policy changes, the Jano site is one of the worst places to look for sources because you’re only going to find results that the vendors want you to find.

 

[Dee X]

That’s because, after the test is completed, the option to pay a little more and have the test result published is offered to the customer. And as @exploitedworkerbee pointed out (on another forum), that leads to cherry picking results. Have you ever noticed that there are only good test results on the public page of Jano’s website?

I would argue that right now, until that policy changes, the Jano site is one of the worst places to look for sources because you’re only going to find results that the vendors want you to find.

I definitely agree that the "public" ones are the worst place to look at. This is why third party tests are so important, and why communities sharing their results is critical.

... and to be completely clear to everyone here: we're not only talking about Nexaph results. We're talking about everyone listed there.

 

[zpped]

That's fair. Is there a vendor you trust to deliver 99%+ quality 100% of the time? The only one I can think of is QSC (maybe), but they have horrible customer service and you're SOL if there is an issue with your delivery.

I think you're putting way too much weight on what purity really means in these tests. But if you think QSC delivers high purity numbers you're very mistaken.

 

[noteablequotable]

I think you're putting way too much weight on what purity really means in these tests. But if you think QSC delivers high purity numbers you're very mistaken.

That was the impression I had based on comments I've seen but I've only seen comments. 100% ready to defer to you on that.

I think 98% is okay and I'm not mad about it. I don't think I've overestimated the value of purity at all.

Can you share some examples?

You're in Peppy's right? There is currently a super long thread about them refusing to help a customer with their package. It's a great example of why I would never work with them.

 

[Nikki nik]

I saw that in Peppys. I wonder why though

That was the impression I had based on comments I've seen but I've only seen comments. 100% ready to defer to you on that.

I think 98% is okay and I'm not mad about it. I don't think I've overestimated the value of purity at all.



You're in Peppy's right? There is currently a super long thread about them refusing to help a customer with their package. It's a great example of why I would never work with them.

 

[noteablequotable]

I saw that in Peppys. I wonder why though

QSC honestly just doesn't care. People continue to buy from them when they treat individual customers poorly so they're basically getting away with it.

 

[Nikki nik]

QSC honestly just doesn't care. People continue to buy from them when they treat individual customers poorly so they're basically getting away with it.

I've witnessed the poor treatment. Just did my first gyc order I may stick with them