Recommended supplier

[Calm Logic]

And a list, like the one above, is more helpful when showing how relatively good vendors go bad or disappear, as in an exit scam.

 

[zpped]

For newbies to not sort through a million vendor offers, hopes of decreasing scammers, known problem vendors, track records of good testing results.

Known scammers are removed from the vendor section. Every vendor is either a long list of problems or mostly unknown.

KK already pointed out how his list would have been completely different six months ago. Which just shows in a month someone is going to read this and rely on something he said which will be completely outdated by then.

 

[Jennyjv03]

Since there are many requests to name a specific vendor who is "reliable" (a relative term when speaking of GLP-1 providers who are not selling the presription stuff, I'll do so. Here is my list of semi-recommended vendors. The order they are listed in has nothing to do with which one is better. I'm not including the way overpriced domestic vendors, many of which are quite reliable.

Shanghai Nexa Pharma • aka SPC • aka SNP: A little on the pricy side. Despite the name, you're buying it from a guy who lives in the US. If you're going to skip testing, SNP is a good place to use because SNP arranges and pays for some supposedly independent tests. While I'm not sure how independent those tests truly are, SNP users often regularly test. When there is a problem, Cain fixes the problem. He accepts credit cards. Someone will bring up the fact that when Cain first started he told a million lies. I'm not going to try to defend him on that point; Cain for the most part does not try to defend his past lies.

Shanghai Sigma Audley New Material Technology • aka SSA: Good place. This is the cheapest place on the list. Like most vendors, you are going to need to have your stuff tested, join a group that's testing your batch, or just wait until someone tests. However, relying on other people's test can be bad because your grey top retatrutide may be from a completely separate batch than the other person's grey top retatrutide that was sold 3 days aspart.

Tianjin-Cangtu International • aka TCI (NOT Tianjin FINDER International) • aka HBCangtu. Good place.

Peptide Group Buys (PGB): Even most folks who regularly pay for testing of the GLP-1 drugs they buy don't test when purchasing from PGB. They do true independent testing of what they buy before selling it to you. They're pricier than some of the others, however, you probably don't have to test. You do have to be pretty good with computers and you have to be willing to use crypto to use PGB.

Amo (BFF): There used to be a place called Amo, then BFF, but it keeps getting renamed and they keep losing their website. When they're around, they consistently produce good quality stuff.

This list is, to a large degree copied from Cocodrie's list.

GYC isn't included because they've recently been silent.

Shanghai Wibson Biotechnology Co., Ltd. (WBS) isn't on my list yet. They are new, often have lower prices than SSA, but they are too new for me to recommend. But many people like them.

If I had produced a list 6 months ago, many of the vendors that would have been on that list would not have made the current list. It is common for good vendors to stop being good vendors.

If you make many purchases of GLP-1 drugs from non-prescription sources, you are quitely likely to be scammed at some point. That is the cost of buying research grade peptides.

If someone disagrees with something I wrote, please comment here publicly so others can read what you believe.

Just want to second the recommendation of SSA for Tirz 40. I just received my first order from them, in THREE days (US STOCK). Probably would have been faster if Vegas mail wasn't so slow. My order arrived in Vegas the 18th, I ordered around 2am 6/17 & received it 6/20. None of that matters if product sucks, first dose is GOOD/GREAT so far! (Dated 2/2025) Last order was from SRY and had to double the dose for effect. Plus it took a while & a lot of shaking for it to disolve when reconstituted (made a post a while back w pics etc). SSA immediately disolved (40mg) after adding the first 1cc vs SRY (30mg). Only did 10mg and that may be too much. Was at 15mg w SRY, 5mg when starting theirs. Increasing dose is expected so didn't know if it was the product or just time. This new SSA confirmed my suspicion as its much more potent at a lower dose, disolves quickly, extremely fast shipping, & at a good price. Just wanted to share my experience. *As warned throughout this forum, many times, my experience might not be yours.*

 

[Calm Logic]

The SSA could be more overfilled than SRY, assuming SRY was not underfilled.

 

[keangkong]

I'm not going to disagree as much as I'm going to ask for an explanation of this overwhelming desire people have to create GLP vendor lists?

I'm genuinely curious.

Because using a recommended vendor list will help folks who might otherwise be scammed or just make bad choices. I think I know enough to make reasonably safe choices and suggestions. Do I know enough to avoid being scammed? Tracy from QSC took my money and then disappeared, so the answer is no. Do I know better than you? No. Plenty of people on this forum likely make better buying choices than I do. Do I think someone should just rely on what I wrote? No. But I'd rather they rely on what I said then rely on the person who dm'd them promising terrific deals.

 

[hexagonal]

The SSA could be more overfilled than SRY, assuming SRY was not underfilled.

SSA seems to overfill by 10% or so pretty regularly. Their last T40 test ended up at 44mg, their 36IU HGH kits tend to be around 40IU, etc. R60 kit I have is like 66mg.

 

[ZippityDooDah]

Because using a recommended vendor list will help folks who might otherwise be scammed or just make bad choices. I think I know enough to make reasonably safe choices and suggestions. Do I know enough to avoid being scammed? Tracy from QSC took my money and then disappeared, so the answer is no. Do I know better than you? No. Plenty of people on this forum likely make better buying choices than I do. Do I think someone should just rely on what I wrote? No. But I'd rather they rely on what I said then rely on the person who dm'd them promising terrific deals.

I totally understand the reason(s) behind the lists, I guess what I'm trying to figure out is what the motivations are behind them; why some people feel so compelled to create & maintain them (and I'm not singling you out by any means, you just happen to be the person I'm talking to at the moment).

Of course I grasp and appreciate the the desire to help people aspect; I created an entire forum based on that premise. It just seems like there is more to it than that which what I'm trying to understand.

It continues to puzzle me why people take it on as a sacred mission. Obviously some are entirely motivated by a desire for financial gain, either to steer people toward one or more 'preferred' sellers because they are in fact one of those sellers or because they receive some other reward or compensation for doing so, or they seek to directly profit from selling the list itself. And again to be perfectly clear, I'm not suggesting for a moment that you are motivated by any of those things, but knowing that is the driving force behind many lists is one of the main reasons I think they are more frequently a disservice to the community than anything else.

 

[Skidude]

Because using a recommended vendor list will help folks who might otherwise be scammed or just make bad choices. I think I know enough to make reasonably safe choices and suggestions. Do I know enough to avoid being scammed? Tracy from QSC took my money and then disappeared, so the answer is no. Do I know better than you? No. Plenty of people on this forum likely make better buying choices than I do. Do I think someone should just rely on what I wrote? No. But I'd rather they rely on what I said then rely on the person who dm'd them promising terrific deals.

Having discovered this forum last September, as a result of a list, and seeing the associated issues over time; I wonder if it really is a good idea to help people source instead of allowing them to run the scavenger hunt that will help them learn something along the way.

I mean if you give, some, people the keys to CVS will they know which drugs not to take together and what to watch out for? I am anti-nanny state and believe people need to make their own choices, but I don't give my grandson keys to the pickup truck. I started him off on the golf cart.

It seems like the philosophy behind the contrasting methods is:
1) put it all out there and let the cards fall where they may.
or
2)make people take steps to learn and maybe it will be better when they find a source.
I would argue risk reduction and true "help" are better provided in the second method.

Don't mistake this for me being condescending, as I too was suggesting places like Nexaph and BFF, at a point not too long ago, and then I saw issues with them, and so many others, and realized that my recommended vendor could have a problem on the next sale.
Do i send some one to SRY the day before they sell cleaning fluids, Nexa the day the cardboard goes out, Tracy the day he heads to the beach?

Personally, I try to tell them how I choose now as opposed to who I choose, including methods on how to mitigate the dangers.

You know.. Teach a man to fish kind of strategy.


Maybe we need a FAQ on how to select a vendor, that includes all the methods we have learned along the way, as opposed to a list that is only as good as yesterday?

 

[Calm Logic]

And any good list with a lot of nuance may still end up on TikTok, in one form or another.