Regular BAC vs BAC + Acetic Acid? Which is better for what?

Mustafa

Registered
Joined
Jul 15, 2024
Messages
2
Reaction score
2
Location
California, USA
I saw that QSC has two BAC water options, a regular one at 7.22 PH and another BAC + Acetic Acid option at 3.3 PH. Which is better for what?

I heard that cagri does better when acidic. Does that mean I should reconstitute my sema with BAC and my cagri with BAC + Acetic Acid?
 

Attachments

  • IMG_6707.jpeg
    IMG_6707.jpeg
    510.9 KB · Views: 6
It all depends on the peptide you’re reconstituting. Sodium bicarbonate is used for peptides too acidic, such as non-buffered Nad+, while acetic acid is used for peptides that need a lower pH (such as the much debated Cagri).
 
Last edited:
Just so you know: I wanted to target a lower pH for reconstituted cagri, so I used Hospira Bacteriostatic 0.9% Sodium Chloride. Specifically, the monograph of "Hospira Bacteriostatic 0.9% Sodium Chloride" reads "Each milliliter (mL) contains sodium chloride 9 mg and 0.9% (9 mg/mL) benzyl alcohol added as a bacteriostatic preservative. May contain hydrochloric acid for pH adjustment . . . . The pH is 5.0." When I reconstituted cagri with the latter, I got a solution with a pH of about 5.0 to 5.25. I tested the refrigerated solution's pH over the course for a few weeks and it was consistent. If I were going back to cagri I would try to use acetic acid to lower this to 4.0.
NOTE: I have no expertise in this and this approach may be ill-considered. But your question seemed to implicate my experience, so, FWIW, there you go.
 
You should use the AA (acetic acid) Bac water for cagri. Cagri likes a pH of around 3.5-4 max. But! At such levels the liquid is very acidic and will sting … so I dont know what needs to be done about that part …
Also make sure you filter your cagri to remove any fibrils formation following your reconstitution.
 

Trending content

Latest posts

Forum statistics

Threads
1,964
Messages
32,611
Members
3,584
Latest member
Cabo999
Back
Top