RFK Jr. and GLP-1s

i didn't read this because it was doing something weird "verifying your device" .

in general he'll be good getting rid of bureaucrats that are a drag on progress and having less regulation. we think.
 
his stated views are not consistent so it's hard to say what he will do. from what i can tell the common thread is a general cloud of anti-establishment viewpoints, but whether that means pharma ozempic bad/bootleg ozempic good remains to be seen. we're in for a wild ride with an administration that is all over the map and with no real platform.
 
I'm going to keep this comment politically neutral, but from what I've seen from him personally, my take on RFK Jr and peptides is that he seems to think peptides are a good thing if you're fit and want to get jacked (I'd bet money he's using HGH :ROFLMAO: ), but that he looks at GLPs with disdain, and thinks "clean food", exercise and a clean environment are what overweight people need.
 
Although it’s fun to toy around with hobbyists and joke about research, I really do appreciate the seriousness that comes with rigorous science. The assault on expertise shown here is staggering.
To clarify, by “here” you mean the political appointments that are very obviously driven by fealty vs professional experience and suitability, not “here” as in glp1forum?
 
Who knows if he'll be confirmed or if he does half of what he talks about. Some of his statements make it seem like he's in favor of the non-glp1 peptides, though what he actually means - more government funding of research so we get clinical trials, or just putting them back on the FDA compounding list, or something else entirely - is unclear from everything I've seen.

I know people that grew up on wellwater without added flouride and can say that I am absolutely a believer in flouridating the water supply, though.
 
the good news is that it looks like the senate doesn't have the votes for a recess, so these trump appointments will all be getting grilled by the senate. the problem is, there's just so many terrible appointments (take your pick between gabbard, gaetz, rfk, etc) that it's unlikely we'll be able to stop them all.
 
) that it's unlikely we'll be able to stop them all.
even if they are "stopped" it's 95% he'll find a yes person to do anything. this is how most of corporate America works. independent thinkers do not get very high up in the company. i don't know why people think they've never seen any of this before. we all live it everyday.
 
1000004560.jpg


Seems like the new administration may end up on the same page.

Either way, again, we're literally buying black market drugs from China lmfao who cares what the laws or policies are
 
even if they are "stopped" it's 95% he'll find a yes person to do anything. this is how most of corporate America works. independent thinkers do not get very high up in the company. i don't know why people think they've never seen any of this before. we all live it everyday.
eh, it depends on the role. look at merrick garland. or jerome powell. not all presidential appointments are yes men. trump's situation is a bit unique as well as he doesn't really have a platform or a plan on anything beyond what just sounds good to his supporters at any given moment. these appointments are more about rewarding his friends for supporting him during the campaign which i believe means they'll be operating with little to no direction/directive from trumps administration (but we'll see how that goes i guess).
 
View attachment 3673

Seems like the new administration may end up on the same page.

Either way, again, we're literally buying black market drugs from China lmfao who cares what the laws or policies are
unless they go OTC at dollar tree i'll be sticking to daddy tracy. dealing with the healthcare system is a fricking nightmare, and "affordable" is a very relative word when we have access to $0.50/mg tirzepatide.
 
eh, it depends on the role. look at merrick garland. or jerome powell. not all presidential appointments are yes men. trump's situation is a bit unique as well as he doesn't really have a platform or a plan on anything beyond what just sounds good to his supporters at any given moment. these appointments are more about rewarding his friends for supporting him during the campaign which i believe means they'll be operating with little to no direction/directive from trumps administration (but we'll see how that goes i guess).
i would put a lot of money on jpow's replacement being the yessiest of yes men, moreso than any other appointment. one thing djt does care about is the ability to directly control interest rates so he can juice the economy before elections. i wouldnt be surprised if jared is the next fed chairman.
 
politics aside, i figure he can't really hurt the cause for access to glp1. may not help it either, but probably won't hurt it
 

Trending content

Latest posts

Forum statistics

Threads
1,669
Messages
25,987
Members
3,236
Latest member
No_name_idea
Back
Top