Time to start stocking up, for real?

What I find amusing is that they only have record of 60 shipments from Sep 2023 to January 2025. I'm going to assume that's major seizures. I've looked through the list that customs publishes and noticed that there weren't that many GLPs on there. I really don't think they are very good at finding GLPs and that we don't need to be panicking.
 
Retazempic said:
Cotton to Bondi: investigate counterfeit drugs from China
Click to expand...
Pam Bondi doesn’t work for, or answer to senators or attorneys general.

“Counterfeit” is legally a very specific word and not the same thing as our UGL and gray market peptides. “Counterfeit” would be labeled as Ozempic or another trademarked word. I invite people to look at Blacks Law Dictionary.

Senators each send dozens of letters like this a month to appease their financiers, special interest groups and constituents. They have a wide array of topics that will be things like “what are doing to prevent the import of microchips into the US” or “the world is ending from cow flatulence”.

Most important, be careful how much you order at one time. The government will just seize something that comes through the mail and it’s an amount for personal use. If they can articulate that the amount is intended for distribution, you are looking at a much higher amount of malice. This witch hunt has been going on for decades with steroids and India pharmaceuticals.
 
Retazempic said:
Cotton to Bondi: investigate counterfeit drugs from China
Click to expand...
Look at the history of the US "cracking down" on drugs ... has it ever worked? Bottom line, there is too much money in the market to stop it. Even for the lower prices we are paying. Worse case scenario is that the government makes the process more annoying and it raises the prices.

Take semaglutide for example, it costs about $5 to create a month supply of the retail version and the majority of that cost is the packaging. That number includes a normal profit margin too. https://www.cnbc.com/2024/03/27/novo-nordisk-ozempic-can-be-made-for-less-than-5-a-month-study.html The cost of the drug itself is less than $1 per month without all the bells and whistles.

OK, let's look at a Chinese vender price ... $65 from MIX ... that is at least a $55 profit. A kit of Tirz 60mg is $180 and a Reta 50mg is $310. They probably all cost about the same to make. If true, then a kit of each would bring a profit of $170 and $300 respectively. Now let's say there is a US based reseller making an order for 1000 kits of 50mg Reta ... a Chinese vender is going to want that stuff to be delivered come hell or high water. That delivery would be a box that measures less than 14 cubic feet. Visualize a box (or multiple boxes together) that is smaller than a refrigerator and weighs less than 50 pounds. Drug dogs aren't trained to smell it. Losing a shipment would cost $1000 but a successful shipment brings in $300,000. Heck even a successful shipment of lowly sema is $55,000 of profit.

So let's say the average single kit is a profit of $100 ... and we are each buying about 2-3 kits per year ... there are over a million of us just in the US. That alone is a 3 billion dollar per year industry. And I am being very conservative with the numbers. Considering that the average income in China is about $17,000 ... yeah, they aren't going to stop the supply. No matter how much a shithead senator cries about it.
 
Last edited:
MsGizmo said:
Look at the history of the US "cracking down" on drugs ... has it ever worked? Bottom line, there is too much money in the market to stop it. Even for the lower prices we are paying. Worse case scenario is that the government makes the process more annoying and it raises the prices.

Take semaglutide for example, it costs about $5 to create a month supply of the retail version and the majority of that cost is the packaging. That number includes a normal profit margin too. https://www.cnbc.com/2024/03/27/novo-nordisk-ozempic-can-be-made-for-less-than-5-a-month-study.html The cost of the drug itself is less than $1 per month without all the bells and whistles.

OK, let's look at a Chinese vender price ... $65 from MIX ... that is at least a $55 profit. A kit of Tirz 60mg is $180 and a Reta 50mg is $310. They probably all cost about the same to make. If true, then a kit of each would bring a profit of $170 and $300 respectively. Now let's say there is a US based reseller making an order for 1000 kits of 50mg Reta ... a Chinese vender is going to want that stuff to be delivered come hell or high water. That delivery would be a box that measures less than 14 cubic feet. Visualize a box (or multiple boxes together) that is smaller than a refrigerator and weighs less than 50 pounds. Drug dogs aren't trained to smell it. Losing a shipment would cost $1000 but a successful shipment brings in $300,000. Heck even a successful shipment of lowly sema is $55,000 of profit.

So let's say the average single kit is a profit of $100 ... and we are each buying about 2-3 kits per year ... there are over a million of us just in the US. That alone is a 3 billion dollar per year industry. And I am being very conservative with the numbers. Considering that the average income in China is about $17,000 ... yeah, they aren't going to stop the supply. No matter how much a shithead senator cries about it.
Click to expand...
You are correct but I hope our government doesn’t turn strings of amino acids into the equivalent of fentanyl! They tried to legislate supplements the same way back in the 80’s but the public cried out and the government backed down. I would say the majority of the fears that the government had regarding supplements have proven to be baseless
 
"January 2020 and October 2023, there were 38 reports of Americans ingesting drugs containing counterfeit active ingredients, with 25 of those reports describing serious health episodes including miscarriage, pancreatitis, and two deaths."

This is all they got? More people were injured and were killed from eating tacos in that time frame. I'm totally guessing but seriously, this is totally bought and paid for...
 
AndyPanda said:
Name one bureaucrat or politician on any side of any aisle that hasn’t been bought and paid for.
Click to expand...
You asked the question in a way that you're guaranteed to get answers you want. Running for any important office requires money whether that be for organizing or advertising. People will donate to that politician. They may be motivated by self-interest. Or they may be motivated because they're inspired by that politician. By labelling all politicians as bought and paid for and applying a standard that no one who is going to win is ever going to be meet, you're discouraging people from taking to steps to decide which politicians are less influenced by money. They're all the same, is your message. I genuinely believe that Mamdani believes most of what he advocates. (I disagree so strongly with Mamdani's politics that I would have voted against him.) A good first place to start is to avoid supporting politicians who seem to use the office to advance their own financial interests.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Trending Topics

Latest Posts

Members Online

Total: 240 (30 Members & 210 Guests)

Forum Statistics

Threads
7,173
Posts
87,605
Members
21,188
Newest
mountaing0rilla

Share This Page!

Top Bottom