Wasted $170 and 4 months with a certain vendor on my first experience

msorganized01

GLP-1 Apprentice
Member Since
Oct 20, 2024
Posts
39
Likes Received
48
From
NJ, United States
EDITED TO ADD:
The vendor provided test results of 99.8% and a fill of 12.8mg (10mg was purchased). This vendor has had stellar reviews on all platforms I've utilized for research, and consistently valid test results from others testing their product, so I went ahead and trusted them.
I'm not definitively saying they scammed me; I'm frustrated that I've wasted time and money when others seem to have had good experiences with them and confused as to why.
Believe me, I took over a year to research and even wasted product in the beginning of my journey because I was so nervous to start and procrastinated the first pin so long that I had to toss my first product (this was before I discovered CN vendors). I triple and quadruple checked my math, several different websites to verify the measurements, spent hours reading forums and other platforms to get the most info before starting.



I apologize in advance for the very long post with this has been a complex journey.

i DO want to name the vendor here but I don't want to be blackballed from this forum. I researched long and hard for about a year and a half buying from a CN supplier 3 months ago. I ordered a box of 10mg Tz and I received it within 5 days. I started at the normal dose and have gone all the way up to 10 mg and have experienced zero appetite suppression. If I'm being generous, maybe 20% on certain days here and there. To be fair, I did not test before using due to cost concerns. Which I'm fully expecting to get crap for, but that's ok. In all reality, we are paying for a product and we expect to be able to trust that we are getting what we paid for (in a perfect world, I guess).

What I'm asking is if it's okay to post a vendor name, and if anyone else has experienced this with this particular vendor. I'm willing to consider that maybe I'm doing something wrong but I have watched, read, and otherwise participated in every possible method of research before jumping into this so I don't think it's me.

Also of note is that I have used US suppliers and have lost 20+ lbs. This has been an almost 2-year long road for me and I've probably complicated things along the way by trying to find a better way of doing things or a better price even when something was working for me. However, every other vendor I've used has sent me effective product. This is the first time have felt no different than if I were on nothing, and as a matter of fact, have gained back some of the weight I initially lost.

Seeking guidance and suggestions. Thank you!
 
Last edited:
You won't be blackballed for naming the vendor and stating your experience and your perspective. It would be different if, for example, you're a vendor or reseller trying to smear another due to a vendetta. Your explanation was thorough and careful.

It's helpful for others to know, and to take your narrative along with whatever else is out there in order to make a decision about buying. Besides the vendor name, any batch info for the tirz (e.g. manufacture date and cap/crimp color) would be helpful. There might be known issues.
 
Real quick because I don't have a lot of time...

For legitimate vendor problems and complaints, naming the vendor is fine, even for brand new members as long as it's not in the Introduce Yourself section.

Brand new members (going entirely by post count, not join date) naming vendors in a question, in praise/promotion, and especially linking their website/telegram/whatever is generally not welcome. I'm not going to say what exactly that post count is, because post QUALITY and likes received also plays into it, but assume if you have under 20-something posts that mentioning vendors by name is not going to go well for you.

Members who have been around a while (and again, there's no specific time frame or post count) are pretty much free to name and discuss vendors at will as long as it isn't (or doesn't appear to be) shilling, and is not in the Introduce Yourself section.

Hopefully that clears things up.
 
You won't be blackballed for naming the vendor and stating your experience and your perspective. It would be different if, for example, you're a vendor or reseller trying to smear another due to a vendetta. Your explanation was thorough and careful.

It's helpful for others to know, and to take your narrative along with whatever else is out there in order to make a decision about buying. Besides the vendor name, any batch info for the tirz (e.g. manufacture date and cap/crimp color) would be helpful. There might be known issues.
You won't be blacklisted. However, you may find that people here will often doubt that the vendor is the problem if you haven't had the drug tested. While the newer weight loss drugs work quite well, they don't work for everybody.

I remember being skeptical when people started reporting that ASC had sold them bad peptides because I know ASC, at the time, had an excellent reputation. Then when those folks had it tested and proved that the stuff was garbage, I changed my mind.
 
I took the liberty of running the task number and verification code through the Janoshik site. I then took a screenshot of the resulting COA. It's a vendor-supplied COA with the manufacturer being Nexaph. Does anyone know whether there has been any independent testing of that batch? Since OP discussed his FEELZ test, if you used that batch from Nexaph, what were your FEELZ results? The batch number is TIR1003262025-05. You may also try reaching out to Cain directly.

While a vendor-supplied COA from Janoshik that is genuine (as demonstrated by checking on the Janoshik site) proves that the drug supplied to Janoshik tested well, there is no guarantee other than the honesty of the vendor that you received something similar.

You might want to contact Cain directly and express your concerns. It's possible he'll say something that will address those concerns.

The feature of this site that I appreciate most is that folks do express their opinions about vendors. We are allowed to trash talk vendors. In general, I recommend folks use a vendor that is often discussed.
 

Attachments

  • Nexaph.jpg
    Nexaph.jpg
    36.8 KB · Views: 14
There were two vials tested third party on SNP’s third party TG page. Both tested well. I did not check other groups.
 

Attachments

  • IMG_4653.jpeg
    IMG_4653.jpeg
    247.2 KB · Views: 7
Top Bottom