peptidesupremacy08
GLP-1 Novice
Nono, sorry, I thought if I go with a more expensive supplier, then issues wouldn't be present.So, pay more for the same issues?
Nono, sorry, I thought if I go with a more expensive supplier, then issues wouldn't be present.So, pay more for the same issues?
Oh, I understand your thinking. Everyone is just reselling. You can buy a "tested" kit with batch numbers and all but how do you know that particular kit isn't filled with several different runs. You can send a vial off for testing but that literally just tests that one bottle. Just figure out what you personally are comfortable with. Paying more is only a guarantee that you will be out money you could have thrown into possibly a few more kits.Nono, sorry, I thought if I go with a more expensive supplier, then issues wouldn't be present.
I see, that makes plenty of sense. I found this group after I paid like 800 for a 10mg kit from a domestic vendor. I'm so upset that it was basically 10x the price, and the risks you noted are basically still there.Oh, I understand your thinking. Everyone is just reselling. You can buy a "tested" kit with batch numbers and all but how do you know that particular kit isn't filled with several different runs. You can send a vial off for testing but that literally just tests that one bottle. Just figure out what you personally are comfortable with. Paying more is only a guarantee that you will be out money you could have thrown into possibly a few more kits.
It's really a personal decision, based on your level of risk aversion. Personally, I think the risk is worth the savings. Others are much more cautious.I see, that makes plenty of sense. I found this group after I paid like 800 for a 10mg kit from a domestic vendor. I'm so upset that it was basically 10x the price, and the risks you noted are basically still there.
On another note, I just joined the STG telegram. I see that group testing is the norm there, is that what's typically recommended here? I was under the impression that group testing means we can test way more vials, but it seems like they only test 1-2 vials anyways, so might as well just test myself? Or not even test at all and just wait for the results to be public?
Are you never worried about the peptides being mixed up? I've heard that can happen, but I'm unsure if it's a significant risk.It's really a personal decision, based on your level of risk aversion. Personally, I think the risk is worth the savings. Others are much more cautious.
Do you think that this is a major problem, or is it more something that personally makes you a little uneasy? Their prices seem really good, and I'm just looking to get Retatrutide, so I want to know if it's worth fretting over. I do plan to get at least one vial tested from my order (I can't really afford to test a whole heap of vials atp).Do you think that this is a major problem, or is it more something that personally makes you a little uneasy? Their prices seem really good, and I'm just looking to get Retatrutide, so I want to know if it's worth fretting over. I do plan to get at least one vial tested from my order (I can't really afford to test a whole heap of vials atp).
Also, do you know if the issue is going to be remediated at any point? Did your rep say anything about that?
Finally, do you know what other vendors don't have this issue--and offer similar prices?
It can and it has, but it's not common. If it did happen, the chances of it killing me are small. I might end up being sick for a few days, and I'm ok with that possibility. I probably take more risk driving my car every day.Are you never worried about the peptides being mixed up? I've heard that can happen, but I'm unsure if it's a significant risk.
Bruh I paid 600 for 60mg from a tele care provider. So mad I didn't take the time to figure out gray before.I see, that makes plenty of sense. I found this group after I paid like 800 for a 10mg kit from a domestic vendor. I'm so upset that it was basically 10x the price, and the risks you noted are basically still there.
On another note, I just joined the STG telegram. I see that group testing is the norm there, is that what's typically recommended here? I was under the impression that group testing means we can test way more vials, but it seems like they only test 1-2 vials anyways, so might as well just test myself? Or not even test at all and just wait for the results to be public?
Tbf to myself I guess, I didn’t even know this existed when I bought that Reta. I’m guessing you didn’t either. It’s a good thing we did find this group at some point though!Bruh I paid 600 for 60mg from a tele care provider. So mad I didn't take the time to figure out gray before.
Tbf to myself I guess, I didn’t even know this existed when I bought that Reta.Bruh I paid 600 for 60mg from a tele care provider. So mad I didn't take the time to figure out gray before.
Thank you for the thoughtful reply!Do you think that this is a major problem, or is it more something that personally makes you a little uneasy? Their prices seem really good, and I'm just looking to get Retatrutide, so I want to know if it's worth fretting over. I do plan to get at least one vial tested from my order (I can't really afford to test a whole heap of vials atp).
Major problem? I guess it depends on how much you trust complete strangers who are trying to get into your wallet/purse. If you care a great deal about what you inject into your body, then it would matter more than if you were a MesoRx goon who is willing to inject anything to look good. I consider it highly unlikely that you will inject an alleged GLP and kill yourself but the risk is not zero. I think you're pretty safe if you're testing one of your viles which would make your personal risk much, much lower than untested use. An additional risk-reduction strategy might include finding other buyers around the same time and teaming up to test multiple vials.
Their prices seem really good...
No doubt about that! T120 for .27/mg. and R60 for .55/mg. are insanely cheap prices and, believe me, I'm tempted despite already having a freezer full.
Also, do you know if the issue is going to be remediated at any point? Did your rep say anything about that?
I doubt that SSA will change this policy given my conviction that it helps them sell old product that they would otherwise be stuck with if it could be reliably dated. My rep generally tells me whatever they think I want to hear 😕
Finally, do you know what other vendors don't have this issue--and offer similar prices?
When you spend time in this space, you will find that resellers use a number of strategies to reduce a host of risks including bad product, no product or someone running off with your money. Those risk reduction strategies cost money and will result in higher prices for your gear. I'm ok with that.
Careful research, lots or reading and getting to know some kind people who have been around a while will also help you more than anything. I've been really fortunate in that area although it still took considerable effort on my part.
You seem pretty careful and have given this some thought. This puts you miles ahead of many others out there who are uniformed/ill-informed and couldn't care less about safety issues.
They really seem to pick certain orders to just mess with. Before placing an order ask yourself, is this the one that they are going to play around with.So now a update...
after placing a few big orders with them. I can now say I ran into a issue.
so now more than a month. was told " package cleared etc... fedex will deliver"
no movement not even a fedex got shipment, nothing just a tracking with no movement.
patiently waited. communicated asked for any updates... they keep saying it cleared.
still nothing.
2 weeks ago, I was told "if no movement, reissue shipment"
no movement... shipment not sent out.
Message them about it. get the "the package hasn't been returned, we are waiting"
I am confused at this time.
then I get told it was sent out.
last Friday.. no tracking. but was sent with DH.
still no tracking
I ask again, will there be tracking?
you will get tracking today.
today comes and goes.
No tracking, wondering if it was a waste of $$
even offered to pay for the reshipping to be sent out.
so, it doesn't matter how much you buy or pay,
you may still be jerked around, and stringed along.
it's been like pulling teeth to get answers, and this has led me to really think about placing another order.
tip: pay for the faster shipping its worth it
t60 is .29, why bother with t120 unless you resell and need the 10ml bottle?T120 for .27/mg.
I doubt that SSA will change this policy given my conviction that it helps them sell old product that they would otherwise be stuck with if it could be reliably dated. My rep generally tells me whatever they think I want to hear 😕
Many people or couples share large mg. vials. I have a vial of R80 that I'm sharing and that I wouldn't use soon enough alone (.55/mg). Tirz in particular appears to be largely bullet proof, lasts many years lyophilized and many months reconstituted. Thus, at larger doses, it's much cheaper at bigger sizes. I never understood why people would waste money on T5, T10, etc.t60 is .29, why bother with t120 unless you resell and need the 10ml bottle?
Have to find someone that has no stock i guess, when it's back it will be new ( unless they buy inventory from others with overstock and change labels )
Ditto! I’ve pinned two month old reconstituted tirz after a pause and felt it was just as effective as the day I mixed it up.Many people or couples share large mg. vials. I have a vial of R80 that I'm sharing and that I wouldn't use soon enough alone (.55/mg). Tirz in particular appears to be largely bullet proof, lasts many years lyophilized and many months reconstituted. Thus, at larger doses, it's much cheaper at bigger sizes. I never understood why people would waste money on T5, T10, etc.
I’m kinda broke right now...Tbf to myself I guess, I didn’t even know this existed when I bought that Reta.
Thank you for the thoughtful reply!
After I posted this I spent some time digging around looking for the STG telegram and found it. I’ve decided I’ll stick with them and just do the group tests. I’m kinda broke right now, but not being fat is a major priority, and so given how many people seem to use them and not have issues, I figure I can tolerate the risk.
Hopefully I don’t get cancer or something…
The assumption is people who buy the same product from the same vendor at the same time are likely to have the same product. That's the assumption. Sending in a few vials from actual 3rd party recipients minimizes cost when divvied up. $300 for one individual, only $3 for 100 individuals.I was under the impression that group testing means we can test way more vials, but it seems like they only test 1-2 vials anyways, so might as well just test myself? Or not even test at all and just wait for the results to be public?
t60 is .29, why bother with t120 unless you resell and need the 10ml bottle?
Have to find someone that has no stock i guess, when it's back it will be new ( unless they buy inventory from others with overstock and change labels )
That last line is so morbid 🤣The assumption is people who buy the same product from the same vendor at the same time are likely to have the same product. That's the assumption. Sending in a few vials from actual 3rd party recipients minimizes cost when divvied up. $300 for one individual, only $3 for 100 individuals.
The only certain result is the actual vial tested and discarded in the lab. That's the highest confidence you can have in the remaining 9 vials. A notch down in confidence is the scenario above with comfort in numbers. The least trustworthy is a vendors test. Today you can see offerings from vendors linked to tests that are months old. Was business that slow or are they running multiple batches and cheaping out on testing? Most dubious are the vendor's who don't spring for vial photos or mention lid color eliminating that disqualifier.
If you're cheap as you've said elsewhere the cheapest "test" is buying your product from a popular vendor and waiting until the testing done by others trickles in. STG is one of the places to check. The catch here is if someone died from their peptide they won't be reporting it! 😉
The truth is neither of these things really provide that big a meaningful jump in knowledge. If you have 50 people (500 vials) and test 3 of them (0.6%), you basically don't know anything about the batch. You can't really trust the average value in the value, or the purity, as there isn't enough data, especially factoring in the +/- 5-10% accuracy of the tests themselves. I think testing is better than not testing, but statistically it doesn't tell you much. You basically hope those 3 represent the entire batch, but statistically it's a leap of faith from the data, and you mostly have to rely on the vendor doing the right thing.The assumption is people who buy the same product from the same vendor at the same time are likely to have the same product. That's the assumption. Sending in a few vials from actual 3rd party recipients minimizes cost when divvied up. $300 for one individual, only $3 for 100 individuals.
The only certain result is the actual vial tested and discarded in the lab. That's the highest confidence you can have in the remaining 9 vials. A notch down in confidence is the scenario above with comfort in numbers. The least trustworthy is a vendors test. Today you can see offerings from vendors linked to tests that are months old. Was business that slow or are they running multiple batches and cheaping out on testing? Most dubious are the vendor's who don't spring for vial photos or mention lid color eliminating that disqualifier.
If you're cheap as you've said elsewhere the cheapest "test" is buying your product from a popular vendor and waiting until the testing done by others trickles in. STG is one of the places to check. The catch here is if someone died from their peptide they won't be reporting it! 😉
This is why I emphasized the word "assumption". Everyone has their own comfort level. I take comfort in numbers. My partner will inject anything I put in a syringe and swallow any pill I put in his pill box without question. 🤷♂️The truth is neither of these things really provide that big a meaningful jump in knowledge. If you have 50 people (500 vials) and test 3 of them (0.6%), you basically don't know anything about the batch. You can't really trust the average value in the value, or the purity, as there isn't enough data, especially factoring in the +/- 5-10% accuracy of the tests themselves. I think testing is better than not testing, but statistically it doesn't tell you much. You basically hope those 3 represent the entire batch, but statistically it's a leap of faith from the data, and you mostly have to rely on the vendor doing the right thing.
Actually this brings to mind recent orange top T30. It's been offered by at least 6 vendors (XTP, WBS, TFC, ABC, ALM & GYC) and 2 group buys the last two months. All of them had orange top T30. I was in a small group buy that initially was going to use ABC but went with TFC instead. TFC test looked good and our GB test came back good. ABC's initial testing came back as low mg (2mg I think) SEMA!The truth is neither of these things really provide that big a meaningful jump in knowledge. If you have 50 people (500 vials) and test 3 of them (0.6%), you basically don't know anything about the batch. You can't really trust the average value in the value, or the purity, as there isn't enough data, especially factoring in the +/- 5-10% accuracy of the tests themselves. I think testing is better than not testing, but statistically it doesn't tell you much. You basically hope those 3 represent the entire batch, but statistically it's a leap of faith from the data, and you mostly have to rely on the vendor doing the right thing.
Yah that's sort of the point I'm making (and you too I think). With just testing 0.6% of the vials, or whatever small number it is, you can't be confident you get a real snapshot of that everyone has. Like I said, it's better than nothing. But the real value is probably in keeping the vendors honest knowing other people are testing (such that they implement proper process control etc). The numbers themselves don't tell you too much, except of course when you get very lucky and find something completely wrong like that one did (but had another donor submitted a vial, it may not have shown up at all).Actually this brings to mind recent orange top T30. It's been offered by at least 6 vendors (XTP, WBS, TFC, ABC, ALM & GYC) and 2 group buys the last two months. All of them had orange top T30 although. I was in a small group buy that initially was going to use ABC but went with TFC instead. TFC test looked good and our GB test came back good. ABC's initial testing came back as low mg (2mg I think) SEMA!
There's a lot to digest there! 🤔