SAFETY WARNING! Yura / HYB RETA blue caps (R10)

[Nathanologist]

AFI is legit, they use UV spec though, they can identify knowns and quantities, but UV spec cannot identify unknown

They all use UC-HPLC. If you have a lab that affordable offers tandem MS/MS please share.

 

[nevets]

They all use UC-HPLC. If you have a lab that affordable offers tandem MS/MS please share.

No, AFI uses UV spec, you can read it on their report…

 

[Nathanologist]

It’s like you’re both ignoring HYB’s own acknowledgment that it’s true.

HYB has no other option if they want to survive. Even they have not provided their own COAs on the batch or adequately explained what happened. I’ve read their ape statement and messaged with their reps. They aren’t doing QC, they’re doing damage control. They say they’re testing all their current stock batches with Jano- but that will takes weeks. Cheaper and better for them to acknowledge and refund ASAP whether true or not.

 

[dogmom]

I'm curious what was really in the reta.

 

[Nathanologist]

No, AFI uses UV spec, you can read it on their report…

Even worse. No separation. No purity. No identity. No quantification. No confirmation the compound is even a peptide. The report is 💩even if the lab is ‘legit’ as in they exist in the world.

 

[tendency]

I do, yes. We’ve seen the production videos. 🤷🏽‍

Can you post a link to one of these production videos? I'm curious now. So does Nexaph source the raw peptides, presumably from China, then package them at their own facility?

 

[nevets]

Even worse. No separation. No purity. No identity. No quantification. No confirmation the compound is even a peptide. The report is 💩even if the lab is ‘legit’ as in they exist in the world.

Concentration is based on absorbance in UV spec, and for purposes of confirming peptide prevalence for the use of peptide users is fine. They are able to tell if what is expected is in the vial and the concentration based on known data. I’m not sure why there’s so much hate on UV spec when it’s cheaper and effective for purposes of the general population of peptide users. We know it isn’t reta and that we shouldn’t use it.

 

[IshimaruKenta]

AFI is legit, they use UV spec though, they can identify knowns and quantities, but UV spec cannot identify unknown

Define legit when they don't even have a valid website or a professional email address? They may be a business, but I'd never trust them.

 

[IshimaruKenta]

Darwin Award winners. If the story is true I still hope they recover and learn that Russian Roulette isn’t good for your health. Stories like this will only lead to stricter regulations and better technology to search imported goods.

I had the same thought as this user:
View attachment 10341

Awww, they're talking about my posts. 😍

 

[Lowkey]

There is a test report from AFI. I took a snap of it. The test is dated yesterday. Don’t know if it’s real or not.

That's a 1000% fake COA company.

EDIT- Wording on the COA is wrong, picked a name similar to a real testing company, the company name AFI isn't registered anywhere, the site is only 7 days old.

 

[50ShadesGreyMarket]

Two people out of 6000 kits that were produced? lol I am not too worried. I wonder where the water came from? Was it Hospira? Muahaha!!!

Also, seeing how filthy some folks live and keep their recon space, refusing to observe any level of cleanliness, it’s more likely they injected the vial they store next to the used cat litter. 🤣

 

[IshimaruKenta]

Also, I don't like the idea of someone forcing my hand to use a specific vendor, feels SUS to me. I have a lot of respect for Jano testing... but, Ted Bundy's girlfriend could say the same before she found out he was a SK. You can never really trust anyone.

Weird way to say that. But let's say you get an "bad" batch and test from those labs show the same, you go to the vendor and ask for a refund. But they tell you to kick rocks and provide a Jano test. I think you'd want to go the Janoshik route. They use Jano and unless you're truly worried about saving money, you should too.

 

[nevets]

Define legit when they don't even have a valid website or a professional email address? They may be a business, but I'd never trust them.

Legitimate as in their methods are legit and the spectra provided is a legit UV Spec. All the COAs I’ve seen are accurate portrayals of UV spec methods. I don’t know about the business itself but everything I’ve seen come from them is what I would expect from their method.

Source: trust me bro

 

[IshimaruKenta]

Le

Legitimate as in their methods are legit and the spectra provided is a legit UV Spec. All the COAs I’ve seen are accurate portrayals of UV spec methods. I don’t know about the business itself but everything I’ve seen come from them is what I would expect from their method.

Source: trust me bro

Yeah, I don't trust that. Sorry. Nothing about their "business" screams professional. They've said they've been in business since 2008, but doesn't have a website or even an email address from their own domain. They may be registered as a business in Texas, but I wouldn't trust them to tie my shoes.

 

[nevets]

Yeah, I don't trust that. Sorry. Nothing about their "business" screams professional. They've said they've been in business since 2008, but doesn't have a website or even an email address from their own domain. They may be registered as a business in Texas, but I wouldn't trust them to tie my shoes.

We’re buying peptides from discord and telegram with people to portray themselves as females to inject into our bodies but website and email domain is where you draw the line for a testing company?