SAFETY WARNING! Yura / HYB RETA blue caps (R10)

[Nathanologist]

AFI is legit, they use UV spec though, they can identify knowns and quantities, but UV spec cannot identify unknown

They all use UC-HPLC. If you have a lab that affordable offers tandem MS/MS please share.

 

[nevets]

They all use UC-HPLC. If you have a lab that affordable offers tandem MS/MS please share.

No, AFI uses UV spec, you can read it on their report…

 

[Nathanologist]

It’s like you’re both ignoring HYB’s own acknowledgment that it’s true.

HYB has no other option if they want to survive. Even they have not provided their own COAs on the batch or adequately explained what happened. I’ve read their ape statement and messaged with their reps. They aren’t doing QC, they’re doing damage control. They say they’re testing all their current stock batches with Jano- but that will takes weeks. Cheaper and better for them to acknowledge and refund ASAP whether true or not.

 

[dogmom]

I'm curious what was really in the reta.

 

[Nathanologist]

No, AFI uses UV spec, you can read it on their report…

Even worse. No separation. No purity. No identity. No quantification. No confirmation the compound is even a peptide. The report is 💩even if the lab is ‘legit’ as in they exist in the world.

 

[tendency]

I do, yes. We’ve seen the production videos. 🤷🏽‍

Can you post a link to one of these production videos? I'm curious now. So does Nexaph source the raw peptides, presumably from China, then package them at their own facility?

 

[nevets]

Even worse. No separation. No purity. No identity. No quantification. No confirmation the compound is even a peptide. The report is 💩even if the lab is ‘legit’ as in they exist in the world.

Concentration is based on absorbance in UV spec, and for purposes of confirming peptide prevalence for the use of peptide users is fine. They are able to tell if what is expected is in the vial and the concentration based on known data. I’m not sure why there’s so much hate on UV spec when it’s cheaper and effective for purposes of the general population of peptide users. We know it isn’t reta and that we shouldn’t use it.

 

[IshimaruKenta]

AFI is legit, they use UV spec though, they can identify knowns and quantities, but UV spec cannot identify unknown

Define legit when they don't even have a valid website or a professional email address? They may be a business, but I'd never trust them.

 

[IshimaruKenta]

Darwin Award winners. If the story is true I still hope they recover and learn that Russian Roulette isn’t good for your health. Stories like this will only lead to stricter regulations and better technology to search imported goods.

I had the same thought as this user:
View attachment 10341

Awww, they're talking about my posts. 😍

 

[Lowkey]

There is a test report from AFI. I took a snap of it. The test is dated yesterday. Don’t know if it’s real or not.

That's a 1000% fake COA company.

EDIT- Wording on the COA is wrong, picked a name similar to a real testing company, the company name AFI isn't registered anywhere, the site is only 7 days old.

 

[50ShadesGreyMarket]

Two people out of 6000 kits that were produced? lol I am not too worried. I wonder where the water came from? Was it Hospira? Muahaha!!!

Also, seeing how filthy some folks live and keep their recon space, refusing to observe any level of cleanliness, it’s more likely they injected the vial they store next to the used cat litter. 🤣

 

[IshimaruKenta]

Also, I don't like the idea of someone forcing my hand to use a specific vendor, feels SUS to me. I have a lot of respect for Jano testing... but, Ted Bundy's girlfriend could say the same before she found out he was a SK. You can never really trust anyone.

Weird way to say that. But let's say you get an "bad" batch and test from those labs show the same, you go to the vendor and ask for a refund. But they tell you to kick rocks and provide a Jano test. I think you'd want to go the Janoshik route. They use Jano and unless you're truly worried about saving money, you should too.

 

[nevets]

Define legit when they don't even have a valid website or a professional email address? They may be a business, but I'd never trust them.

Legitimate as in their methods are legit and the spectra provided is a legit UV Spec. All the COAs I’ve seen are accurate portrayals of UV spec methods. I don’t know about the business itself but everything I’ve seen come from them is what I would expect from their method.

Source: trust me bro

 

[IshimaruKenta]

Le

Legitimate as in their methods are legit and the spectra provided is a legit UV Spec. All the COAs I’ve seen are accurate portrayals of UV spec methods. I don’t know about the business itself but everything I’ve seen come from them is what I would expect from their method.

Source: trust me bro

Yeah, I don't trust that. Sorry. Nothing about their "business" screams professional. They've said they've been in business since 2008, but doesn't have a website or even an email address from their own domain. They may be registered as a business in Texas, but I wouldn't trust them to tie my shoes.

 

[nevets]

Yeah, I don't trust that. Sorry. Nothing about their "business" screams professional. They've said they've been in business since 2008, but doesn't have a website or even an email address from their own domain. They may be registered as a business in Texas, but I wouldn't trust them to tie my shoes.

We’re buying peptides from discord and telegram with people to portray themselves as females to inject into our bodies but website and email domain is where you draw the line for a testing company?

 

[IshimaruKenta]

We’re buying peptides from discord and telegram with people to portray themselves as females to inject into our bodies but website and email domain is where you draw the line for a testing company?

100% I do. And why shouldn't I? If you're trying to portray yourself as a professional lab, trying to gain clients, you have a website showing the services you offer, maybe show previous tests, etc, and an email address from said website domain. But if you can't even do that, you're showing yourself as not being professional or serious.

I buy them and inject after they've been tested by a professional lab. 🤷‍♂️

 

[Nathanologist]

Concentration is based on absorbance in UV spec, and for purposes of confirming peptide prevalence for the use of peptide users is fine. They are able to tell if what is expected is in the vial and the concentration based on known data. I’m not sure why there’s so much hate on UV spec when it’s cheaper and effective for purposes of the general population of peptide users. We know it isn’t reta and that we shouldn’t use it.

UV/Vis isn’t hated. It’s just the wrong tool. It measures how much “stuff” absorbs light, not whether the right peptide is present or how much of it is intact. You can’t confirm identity, purity, or concentration from a single absorbance curve.

The consumer baseline is HPLC. It shows the actual peptide peak and the impurity profile. The professional standard is HPLC paired with LC-MS/MS, because it confirms the exact mass and fragmentation pattern. That’s how you tell real peptide from look-alike noise.

UV/Vis is cheap, but cheap doesn’t make it useful. It tells you almost nothing about what’s actually in the vial.

 

[Nathanologist]

We’re buying peptides from discord and telegram with people to portray themselves as females to inject into our bodies but website and email domain is where you draw the line for a testing company?

I don’t buy from the vendors you describe. My guy is as honest as can be expected for a careful shady dealer. Vetting a vendor is important, but even then I don’t trust I verify. I don’t buy testing from the least expensive or the most expensive. I buy it from the lab my vendor honors, and double check with the lab that will legitimately do the tests I require regardless of cost, as long as I have the $$.

 

[50ShadesGreyMarket]

I don’t buy from the vendors you describe. My guy is as honest as can be expected for a careful shady dealer. Vetting a vendor is important, but even then I don’t trust I verify. I don’t buy testing from the least expensive or the most expensive. I buy it from the lab my vendor honors, and double check with the lab that will legitimately do the tests I require regardless of cost, as long as I have the $$.

I had heard of SSA loooong before I joined this forum and had them recommended on multiple occasions before I got my licensed drug dealer to prescribe me peptides. I went with them at a good time after reading and verifying from unrelated sources. I’m now watching and waiting for Jeep, they are newer to this forum but I’ve been following the reviews and if/when I purchase from them it will be when I’m willing to take a well-calculated risk. I really wanna buy a large supply of GHK-Cu from them.

 

[IshimaruKenta]

I had heard of SSA loooong before I joined this forum and had them recommended on multiple occasions before I got my licensed drug dealer to prescribe me peptides. I went with them at a good time after reading and verifying from unrelated sources. I’m now watching and waiting for Jeep, they are newer to this forum but I’ve been following the reviews and if/when I purchase from them it will be when I’m willing to take a well-calculated risk. I really wanna buy a large supply of GHK-Cu from them.

All that glitter!

 

[geoguy78]

I'd really like some kind of proof that two people were actually hospitalized. I saw someplace else that the hospitalization "news" was broken on the Swiss. I'm sorry, but I take anything from the Swiss with a grain of salt. A whole lot of crazy and drama there.....

 

[Lowkey]

I'm tired of seeing these fake COA sites. I'm starting to think this whole thing is fake to promote that fake COA provider. And HYB ONLY made an announcement as a precaution because their HGH actually contained no active ingredient. Both reports from "AFI" failed. For the Reta and Mots-c. The tests were conducted a couple days after the site launches, then no one hears about the results until 3 days later. Conveniently after the HGH results were released, which were posted immediately. Followed by the reta story and the AFI reports 4 hours later.

The entire Reta story makes no sense. 1-2mg for months? It's not enough to even build an accumulation to activate it's benefits. The symptoms are that of a bacterial infection that went septic. The claim of these 2 people aren't even 2 people claiming it, but a single person claiming this happened to 2 people. Yet others with the same batch have reported to be fine and working as usual for weeks. This entire story and the AFI tests come from a "manufacturer" who claims to have purchased from HYB to supplement a huge order (Also claiming to be Debbie).

All this comes from various Discord groups including both HYB channels and MESO.

AFI website - analyticalformulations.com DON'T ACTUALLY USE IT FOR TESTING

 

[IshimaruKenta]

I'm tired of seeing these fake COA sites. I'm starting to think this whole thing is fake to promote that fake COA provider. And HYB ONLY made an announcement as a precaution because their HGH actually contained no active ingredient. Both reports from "AFI" failed. For the Reta and Mots-c. The tests were conducted a couple days after the site launches, then no one hears about the results until 3 days later. Conveniently after the HGH results were released, which were posted immediately. Followed by the reta story and the AFI reports 4 hours later.

The entire Reta story makes no sense. 1-2mg for months? It's not enough to even build an accumulation to activate it's benefits. The symptoms are that of a bacterial infection that went septic. The claim of these 2 people aren't even 2 people claiming it, but a single person claiming this happened to 2 people. Yet others with the same batch have reported to be fine and working as usual for weeks. This entire story and the AFI tests come from a "manufacturer" who claims to have purchased from HYB to supplement a huge order (Also claiming to be Debbie).

All this comes from various Discord groups including both HYB channels and MESO.

AFI website - analyticalformulations.com DON'T ACTUALLY USE IT FOR TESTING

Domain:
analyticalformulations.com
Registered On:
2025-11-15

Yeah, that's not shady at all.

 

[geoguy78]

Domain:
analyticalformulations.com
Registered On:
2025-11-15

Yeah, that's not shady at all.

I'm all for USA domestic alternatives to Jano, but there are a few labs that have popped up recently that look a little sus.....

 

[Legdoctor]

Wondering what other peps are affected, i just received tirz 10 from them but slightly different lable ie it has date of manufacture / date of expiry.

Really hesitant to use now, messaged yura yesterday and not a peep