This peptide space is self-policed because - shocker - you can't actually call authorities to complain about your peptides.
You must be AT&T customer
I plead the fifth
that National Public Data breach put all of everyone’s everything out there. Have you checked? Cause after that, I kinda dgaf anymore. I take precautions, but gd.
Not really, I'm kind of at the idgaf place too financially.
I like how you followed it up with the most self-unaware post I've read on here lol.
Tell me more, oh knowledgeable one! I'm hanging on your every ignorant word. Please tell me about who I am and what I have claimed.
Why would I need to venture outside of this conversation? This is all pretty straightforward.
I can understand that, it’s personal health info. I’ve told all the peoples about this bc I can’t keep my mouth shut, lol.
Should be fine as long as you don't lick the needle before pinning yourself
Condoms are the only items in the US that are not oversized
I talk pretty openly on qa about my reasons for being on sema (I like my booze a lil too much) and that's not something I particularly want the people in my life knowing about.
Do you have any idea how many mediocre men think they need magnums?
Uh, I have no idea whom you may be talking about...
It's alright man, if they fit us, everyone can leave us to our delusions. We're not harming anyone!
Says the guy who won’t actually read and engage in the conversation. All you’re doing is popping off with various dickish permutations of “i disagree” and then acting like you’ve schooled the forum with your deep wisdom.
Shhhh we're in the drama stage now, logic doesn't matter anymore.
What else should I be doing? The facts aren't really in question, it's your overboard interpretation of them that I'm poking fun of.
"deep wisdom". rich coming from people who seem to think that basic business operation, or markets with bad actors are something super obscure that only someone who had been shooting themselves up with peptides for an extended period would have any insight into. I think some of you are getting a little too high on your own supply.
Your ability to say “I disagree” while contributing nothing substantive, using so many words in so many versions, is impressive.
You say that as if I'm responding to anything other than your own poor interpretation of events. What is there to add? You overreact to a relatively benign business move as if the very first thing you learned about making money was people selling peptides. That's all there is to this.
Responding to the facts as they’ve been presented would be the appropriate way to engage, rather than hollow, snotty indignation. As I’ve said several times already. Obv you don’t have it in you or you’d have done so by now; I’m done here, Merry Christmas.
As some one with a career in infosec, I fully understand the theoretical issues with the breach but they are so far removed from any real risk that this is being blown out proportion. The bigger issue to me would be if he didn't acknowledge it and make take steps to prevent repeats.
I have never gotten an email with my ssn, closest has been an old password that had been exposed in a hack. even that was unsettling even though i understood what they were doing. The full complement of credit card application details in an out-of-nowhere email must be a big ol shock to receive.
Did I miss something? The only thing that was in the email was a list of email addresses. Nothing else.
No no, the convo was off on a tangent and I was following it, responding to @normal's remarks about getting spam with a bunch of personal info in it (https://glp1forum.com/threads/well-fuck-peptide-test.2132/post-33866). This is not in relation to the peptest email blast, which youre right, only had email addresses.
I had a few concerns with it being just a three person show at first, but I think people are just happy that they can test domestically now.
How many people do you think are on the Jano team? It's only a handful of people and he does an order of magnitude more tests.
None jano’s team are salespeople, which id argue shouldn’t be considered. If you subtract the “marketing department” which is basically an affiliate, you’re left with a husband and wife that handle the business operations and all the lab work at trustpointe.
I think you might have mis-parsed my statement and assumed I meant Josh instead of Jano? I was only saying that Jano's lab only has a handful employees (I believe I've seen him talk about a couple people running tests)
Nah, I read them correctly, I just may have over interpreted what you were getting at. Just trying to say that a business with let’s say 5 employees has more in commmon with a business that has 100 employees than it does with a husband and wife shop. The chasm between the two is dramatic and can’t be written off as “just a few more employees” — they’re totally different animals
Not enough people involved. It's distressing that people still read Shakespeare. Think of the poetry that a committee could have come up with.
There are theories that work attributed to Shakespeare wasn't from a single person...
Yes, I found the video on youtube of his wife helping him to be compelling evidence.
Totally agree with that take. There are too many people spewing “here for you” stuff where it’s all about making a few extra dollars. This is why I am mean to everyone.
I like them and they do ok in the couple of head-to-head lab tests that I have seen. It's also nice not to have send your vials across the pond. Turn around time is normally just a few days. I used them a couple of months ago and the process went smooth. There are others in the US that don't have as good of a track record.
I’d send TrustPointe something i don’t expect to be weird, like qsc tirz or similar. I wouldn’t send them something that could be a curveball, like a new or unsteady vendor, because I don’t think they have a track record that gives confidence in weird results. If they come back with something unexpected you’re going to have to wonder if it was the vendor or the lab, where with Jano you can assume the lab result was solid based on a long track record.
