ACE-031 & Myostatin Inhibitors

50ShadesGreyMarket

GLP-1 Enthusiast
Member Since
Aug 17, 2025
Posts
183
Likes Received
320
From
Houston Texas USA
United-States
I haven’t seen any posts related to Myostatin inhibitors on here. I assume most folks who care about muscle hypertrophy are on HMB or something like that. The trials for Trevagrumab and Garetosmab are in Phase 2b which is usually the point where we start seeing lyophilized vials pop up on the black and then grey market.

Anybody know which door we gotta knock on around here? Considering we have sources for oils, I would assume a peptide that blocks Activin A and ActRII would be extremely popular.
 
Both Trevagrumab and Garetosmab are monoclonal antibodies, bit harder to make than peptides. I have not seen any antibody based therapies available from anywhere apart from the pharmaceutical companies. I have seen myostatin - GDF-8 for sale but I am not sure what the market is for a muscle growth inhibitor.
 
Both Trevagrumab and Garetosmab are monoclonal antibodies, bit harder to make than peptides. I have not seen any antibody based therapies available from anywhere apart from the pharmaceutical companies. I have seen myostatin - GDF-8 for sale but I am not sure what the market is for a muscle growth inhibitor.
ACE-031 does the opposite of inhibiting muscle growth, hence why bodybuilders are taking it with GLP’s. It also helps to gain muscle without the side effects of SARMS and various PED’s.

I’m aware Trevagrumab and Garetosmab are pharmaceuticals, they’re probably not going to be released for 2-3 more years at the earliest and mostly likely for muscular dystrophy and related disorders.

I’m positive ACE-031 is available, I just know how expensive it is and was curious if anybody has found a good source that’s reasonably priced.
 
Trevagrumab and Garetosmabneed need to produced in custom, genetically engineered hamster cells, which could be done in China, but whether the cost and complexity is worth it for the grey market is another story. I suspect one of the reasons monoclonal antibodies are much more popular than peptides in research these days is how easy peptides are to make.
The ACE-031 trials did not go very well, it was tested in humans, but was stopped due to safety concerns, As far as I know it has been abandoned as a drug development target since. It had significant off target effects. Unlike a lot of the popular peptides that have never been tested in humans, this one has and was found to be unsafe. Quoting from my writeup of it which I would have copied from somewhere.
"Non–muscle-related adverse events contributed to the decision to discontinue the study The study was stopped after the second dosing regimen due to potential safety concerns of epistaxis and telangiectasias
ACE-031, a soluble ACVR2B receptor designed by Acceleron Pharma for the treatment of DMD, was prematurely terminated due to severe adverse effects including nosebleed, gum bleeding, telangiectasia, and erythema attributed to cross-inhibition of BMP9 and BMP10, ligands involved in endothelial cell function [50]. In addition, a 43% decrease in serum follicle stimulating hormone (FSH), whose synthesis is stimulated by activins, was observed in healthy, postmenopausal women who received a single dose (3 mg/kg) of ACE-031, which caused a near-maximal suppression of activin signaling"
 
Trevagrumab and Garetosmabneed need to produced in custom, genetically engineered hamster cells, which could be done in China, but whether the cost and complexity is worth it for the grey market is another story. I suspect one of the reasons monoclonal antibodies are much more popular than peptides in research these days is how easy peptides are to make.
The ACE-031 trials did not go very well, it was tested in humans, but was stopped due to safety concerns, As far as I know it has been abandoned as a drug development target since. It had significant off target effects. Unlike a lot of the popular peptides that have never been tested in humans, this one has and was found to be unsafe. Quoting from my writeup of it which I would have copied from somewhere.
"Non–muscle-related adverse events contributed to the decision to discontinue the study The study was stopped after the second dosing regimen due to potential safety concerns of epistaxis and telangiectasias
ACE-031, a soluble ACVR2B receptor designed by Acceleron Pharma for the treatment of DMD, was prematurely terminated due to severe adverse effects including nosebleed, gum bleeding, telangiectasia, and erythema attributed to cross-inhibition of BMP9 and BMP10, ligands involved in endothelial cell function [50]. In addition, a 43% decrease in serum follicle stimulating hormone (FSH), whose synthesis is stimulated by activins, was observed in healthy, postmenopausal women who received a single dose (3 mg/kg) of ACE-031, which caused a near-maximal suppression of activin signaling"
Thanks for going into more detail regarding ACE-031. I’m here because I want to learn and you’re the first person who’s actually been able to explain why these haven’t flooded the market. Much appreciated!
 
I haven’t seen any posts related to Myostatin inhibitors on here. I assume most folks who care about muscle hypertrophy are on HMB or something like that. The trials for Trevagrumab and Garetosmab are in Phase 2b which is usually the point where we start seeing lyophilized vials pop up on the black and then grey market.

Anybody know which door we gotta knock on around here? Considering we have sources for oils, I would assume a peptide that blocks Activin A and ActRII would be extremely popular.
Follistatin is the closest I’ve Seen anywhere but if it worked the cats over at MESO would be all over it. I’m skeptical.
 
Follistatin is the closest I’ve Seen anywhere but if it worked the cats over at MESO would be all over it. I’m skeptical.
Ya, I remember reading a comment there from Tracy that Follistatin is garbage. He recommended somthing else. I don't recall what.
 
Top Bottom