stickfigure
Registered
This is sparked by a conversation in a different thread.
Are We Becoming Addicted to Incretin Mimetics?
Are we witnessing a new wave of dependency right under our noses with drugs like semaglutide, retatrutide and tirzepatide? Are patients—facing what could be a lifetime treatment—exhibiting drug-seeking behaviors reminiscent of more notorious addictive substances? Are people combing through online forums and discord servers, searching for the cheapest GLP-1 supply, disregarding safety concerns and turning to sketchy, non-FDA-approved no -for-human-use sources?
Is Big Pharma, whether intentionally or not, creating a generation of patients dependent on these drugs, just like when opioids were heralded as miracle treatments but ultimately led to tragic addiction crises? Sure, incretin mimetics might not carry the same level of health risks as opioids, but does the pattern of reliance and desperation look eerily similar?
Do we see parallels in the marketing strategy, painted as “for the greater good,” only to have people scrambling for a lifetime prescription, pinned to the allure of weight loss or glucose control? Could it be that the quest to feel better or lose a few extra pounds is driving some users to risk buying untested products from underground markets, like the urge to feel better forces drug addicts to ignore the risks?
And if so, where does the responsibility lie?
What do you think? Is it time for a deeper conversation about possible long-term dependence on incretin mimetics?
Anticipating the frequently expected answer, "I am not addicted" is something all addicts say. Unless you are seriously prepared to stop using GLP-1s cold turkey and for good, you are addicted, for one reason or another. Let's have a serious conversation here.
Are We Becoming Addicted to Incretin Mimetics?
Are we witnessing a new wave of dependency right under our noses with drugs like semaglutide, retatrutide and tirzepatide? Are patients—facing what could be a lifetime treatment—exhibiting drug-seeking behaviors reminiscent of more notorious addictive substances? Are people combing through online forums and discord servers, searching for the cheapest GLP-1 supply, disregarding safety concerns and turning to sketchy, non-FDA-approved no -for-human-use sources?
Is Big Pharma, whether intentionally or not, creating a generation of patients dependent on these drugs, just like when opioids were heralded as miracle treatments but ultimately led to tragic addiction crises? Sure, incretin mimetics might not carry the same level of health risks as opioids, but does the pattern of reliance and desperation look eerily similar?
Do we see parallels in the marketing strategy, painted as “for the greater good,” only to have people scrambling for a lifetime prescription, pinned to the allure of weight loss or glucose control? Could it be that the quest to feel better or lose a few extra pounds is driving some users to risk buying untested products from underground markets, like the urge to feel better forces drug addicts to ignore the risks?
And if so, where does the responsibility lie?
What do you think? Is it time for a deeper conversation about possible long-term dependence on incretin mimetics?
Anticipating the frequently expected answer, "I am not addicted" is something all addicts say. Unless you are seriously prepared to stop using GLP-1s cold turkey and for good, you are addicted, for one reason or another. Let's have a serious conversation here.
Last edited: