Do You Filter Your Peptides Before Use?

Just wondering why he says he uses ultrapure water instead of sterile water for injection. 🤷‍♂️
Janoshik having a glass of peptides and getting ready to order some of the old Ultrapure.

science fiction 70s GIF by FilmStruck
 
Janoshik wrote: "Sterility generally is not an issue with lyophilizates. There are not too many microbes that can survive either lyophilization or months while lyophilized. Those that can are not quite likely to find their way into the vials." That's from https://chat.peppys.org/t/lab-faq-guide-with-janoshik-analytical/4136. Click on the .pdf document and you can read the whole thing if you belong to Peppys.

Edited: I didn't realize that the quotation used strikeout type. I fixed that.
That is in regards to live microbes, there are other things that can be in there that maybe harmful. Jano has an entire business built on certifying these things are safe. He's not going to say yeah, we find all kinds of shii in there..
 
I'm guessing that's sterile? 🤔

That is in regards to live microbes, there are other things that can be in there that maybe harmful. Jano has an entire business built on certifying these things are safe. He's not going to say yeah, we find all kinds of shii in there..
Janoshik will never certify anything is safe. He doesn't have the ability to test for everything.
 
Ultra pure = no ions, organics, particles (chemically pure)
Sterile = no living organisms (biologically pure)

One is generally for lab work and the other is for injection. They are both essentially sterile, if they’ve been packaged in a sterile sealed vial.
 
Janoshik will never certify anything is safe. He doesn't have the ability to test for everything.
No not literally.. Im just saying most of us use these certs, especially if there are more than one, to tell ourselves this is proof that they are safe, at least to an acceptable degree.
If people didnt place that much faith/weight on his coas, he wouldnt be so wildly successful.
 
50Shades got me to thinking about doing it just as a simple precaution. I ordered a couple of filter kits from P Test and now have ordered more of the doo dads I overpaid Ptest for from Amazon. Cheap peace of -mind even though I may be over-thinking the possibility of contaminants and my ability to filter them out. 🙄🫡
 
Why would he filter before testing? That completely defeats the purpose of purpose of the testing. I have never in my hours of research on janoshik of in my correspondence with the labs heard that stated or implied.
It was asked and answered of Jano 100% that he does filter before testing. It's to protect his equipment.

I assume "sterility" testing which is a separate test and has to be requested and paid for, is not done on the machines that are testing mass and purity.
 
Last edited:
Twenty-eight days is the general guidance. I go up to six-weeks, I've read others do three months and longer. My opinion is that these meds are cheap, so why take chances? You really have to decide what your own risk tolerance is.
Thanks. My reasoning was that I considered getting the 60mg vial (x qty 10) but at the start my dosage would be literally 2mg p/wk. I don’t want to tamper with the mixing process so was planning 6ml BAC with the 60mg raw. On that logic even on a ramp up 4 weeks 2, 4 weeks on 4 the constructed vial would have been used for 8 weeks and I would only have used 24mg so the 1 start point vial of 60mg would still have 36mg. Think the penny pinching is silly.
 
Apparently you are not supposed to filter peptides with GHK in them, does anyone know more about this ?

Adsorption to filter membranes Peptides aren’t simple molecules – they’re amphiphilic, with both hydrophilic and hydrophobic regions, and often carry a surface charge. Depending on the filter type (PES, PVDF, PTFE, nylon, etc.), peptides can bind to the membrane via hydrophobic interactions, hydrogen bonding, or electrostatic attraction. This leads to peptide losses of 5–25 %, especially for small, basic peptides like GHK-Cu, which has multiple positively charged amino groups. Sources: Atha & Ingham, J. Chromatogr. A (1981); Ahern & Klibanov, Science (1985) ⸻ 2. Metal chelate instability (GHK-Cu) GHK-Cu is a copper(II) chelate complex of Gly-His-Lys. When passed through a membrane filter: • Cu²⁺ ions can adsorb to the filter, especially PES or PVDF (both have weakly basic sites). • The chelating equilibrium may shift, causing partial dissociation of the copper complex. Result: loss of active GHK-Cu, visible color change (bluish → colorless), and reduced biological activity. Sources: Pickart & Thaler, J. Inorg. Biochem. (1973); Maquart et al., Biochim. Biophys. Acta (1993) ⸻ 3. pH shift and ionic microenvironment Filter membranes have extractable ions (sulfates, carboxylates, or amines). When solution first contacts the membrane, it can cause a local pH drift of ±0.2–0.4 units — sufficient to denature or partially unfold sensitive peptides such as BPC-157 or TB-500. ⸻ 4. No sterility gain for lyophilized sterile powders Properly manufactured peptide blends (like KLOW) are sterile lyophilisates, meaning: • They were already passed through a 0.22 µm sterile filter before freeze-drying. • The vial was sealed under nitrogen or vacuum in aseptic conditions. If you reconstitute with fresh BAC water, new sterile needle, and wipe both stoppers with alcohol, you’re maintaining sterility equal to lab-grade conditions. Filtering afterward adds no sterility benefit but introduces a new contamination risk. ⸻ 5. Shear stress and conformational impact During syringe filtration, the liquid experiences localized shear forces, especially in small-pore filters. This can subtly distort peptide secondary structures, notably in β-turn-rich sequences such as TB-500. It’s minor but measurable in lab settings. ⸻ Summary table Aspect Effect of filtering Consequence Membrane adsorption 5–25 % peptide loss inaccurate dosing Cu²⁺ dissociation breakdown of GHK-Cu complex loss of efficacy pH / ionic change local denaturation instability Sterility no actual improvement contamination risk Shear stress conformational strain reduced bioactivity ⸻ In short Filtering KLOW offers no biochemical benefit and carries several downsides — you risk losing active peptide, destabilizing GHK-Cu, and even reducing shelf life. If the vial was sterile and vacuum-sealed, the correct approach is simply: → reconstitute aseptically, → store refrigerated, → use new sterile needles each time.

I asked janoshik and they do filter before testing.

Opinions ?
 
Apparently you are not supposed to filter peptides with GHK in them, does anyone know more about this ?
I asked janoshik and they do filter before testing.

Opinions ?
🤔 Hadn't heard of this as even a possibility and if it's true I just ordered some sterile vials for the KLOW I ordered for nothing. lmao 😂
Until I hear a to the contrary position the article you quote seems to be an affirmation TO NOT FILTER KLOW 🫡
 
Top Bottom